COVID-19—Evidence of a Fake Pandemic

Written by escapeempire.travel.blog on April 6, 2021. Posted in Current News

DEATH CERTIFICATE FRAUD. This story starts with Minnesota state senator and family doctor Scott Jensen.

On April 3rd, 2020, Dr. Jensen received an email from the Minnesota Department of Health. This email stated that it was okay to diagnose a death as COVID-19 even if he wasn’t sure or hadn’t done any testing to confirm a diagnosis. The email went on to say that if COVID was thought to be a contributing condition, the death could be listed as a COVID-caused death.

On March 24th, the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS), under the direction of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and National Institute of Health (NIH), instructed physicians, medical examiners, and coroners to utilize a new classification methodology for COVID-19 cases in the bulletin National Vital Statistics System COVID-19 Alert No. 2, March 24, 2020.

Key quotes from this document:

“the rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID-19 being the underlying cause more often than not.“

“If the death certificate reports terms such as “probable COVID-19” or “likely COVID-19,” these terms would be assigned the new ICD code. It Is not likely that [National Center for Health Statistics] NCHS will follow up on these cases.“

“COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.”

“If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II.”

What this is saying is that a death certifier can assume a COVID-19 death without any sort of verification and that death certificates will not be audited for accuracy.

Dr. Jensen followed a link in the email to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to read the 7 page, Guidance for Certifying Deaths Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID–19).

This document instructed death certifiers to:

Record COVID-19 as the cause of death listed in Part I of the death certificate, even in assumed cases. It also instructed that COVID-19 be recorded as the primary cause of death even if the decedent had other chronic comorbidities. All comorbidities for COVID-19 would now be listed in Part II, rather than in Part I as they had been since 2003 for all other causes of death. For a critical examination of this document, see: If COVID Fatalities Were 90.2% Lower, How Would You Feel About Schools Reopening?

The instructions de-emphasized comorbities and made COVID-19 the default cause of death. These special instructions exclusive to COVID-19 skewed death certificate results, effectively reclassifying many deaths from a variety of causes, now classified as COVID-19 deaths.

From here Dr. Jensen was involved in a series of radio, television and internet interviews where the new guidelines for filling out death certificates specific to COVID-19 were discussed. (Source) For this exposure of the CDC, Dr. Scott Jensen was targeted by the medical establishment. (Source)

Financial Incentives to Falsify Hospital Admissions

“Anytime healthcare intersects with dollars, it gets awkward. Right now, Medicare has determined that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital you’ll get paid $13,000 dollars. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator, you get $39,000… Nobody can tell me after 35 years in the world of medicine that sometimes those kinds of things have an impact on what we do.” — Dr. Scott Jensen (Source)

Oddly, the use of ventilators can result in trauma to the lungs and may be responsible for causing deaths, as attested to by Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell, an ICU doctor from New York. Indeed, studies from Germany and Philadelphia point to mechanical ventilation as a significant risk factor for death among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. It seems strange to financially incentivize a medical procedure that may actually increase the likelihood of death.

“The CARES Act [financial] distributions were done on different formulas. The first distributions were based on previous formulas used in 2019 and 2018. The high impact distribution was based on, if you as a hospital could reach 161 admissions with COVID-19, then you received–in addition to what you’ve already been paid–$77,000 per admission. Which for many of these hospitals would be 25-30 million dollars. Then there was another high impact distribution a little later on, whereby if you could reach 100 COVID-19 admissions then you could receive $50,000 per admission.” — Dr. Scott Jensen (Source)

The claim of financial incentives for falsified death certificates was confirmed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director Robert Redfield in a July 31, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing. (Source 1) (Source 2)

As a result of these perverse incentives and the new rules for death certificates: gunshot fatalities, poisoning or a motorcycle crash might be counted as COVID-19 deaths.

Because of such blatant and widespread falsification, memes like this have been circulating:

Dr. Scott Jensen’s claims caught the attention of Dr. Henry Ealy. Dr. Ealy’s COVID Research Team team of doctors, scientists, and lawyers had been researching COVID-19 data. They confirmed Dr. Scott Jensen’s claims regarding the reclassification of deaths in this must read peer-reviewed paper: COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective

Some key points from the paper:

All federal agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), are lawfully required to comply with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) and the Information Quality Act (IQA). Data being collected, analyzed, and published by any federal agency is required to meet the highest standards for accuracy, quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity as defined by the PRA, IQA, as well as additional guidelines issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

The key to initiating legal regulatory oversight of all proposed changes to data collection, publication, and analysis is the Federal Register. Each Federal agency is required to submit a formal change proposal to the Federal Register before enacting their proposed changes. By submitting a change proposal to the Federal Register, federal agencies open the minimum 60-day public comment and peer-review process. Additionally, it is the “change proposal submission” to the Federal Register that alerts the OMB that legal oversight of the process has been initiated. Federal agencies that make changes to how they collect, publish, and analyze data without alerting the Federal Register and OMB, as a result, are in violation of federal law.

The CDC published guidelines on March 24, 2020 that substantially altered how cause of death is recorded exclusively for COVID-19. This change was enacted apparently without public opportunity for comment or peer-review. As a result, a capricious alteration to data collection has compromised the accuracy, quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of their published data, leading to a significant increase in COVID-19 fatalities (statistically speaking). This decision by the CDC may have subverted the legal oversight of the OMB as Congressionally authorized by the PRA & IQA as well…

Emphasizing that COVID-19 be specifically placed in Part I of the death certificate while any comorbidities be listed in Part II is genuinely concerning. Changing reporting rules exclusively for COVID-19 cause of death reporting without notifying the Federal Register, OMB, OIRA, or the public, and therefore potentially breaching the PRA & IQA, is even more concerning.

It’s worth noting that Part I of a death certificate is the immediate cause of death listed in sequential order from the official cause on line item (a) to the underlying causes that contributed to death in descending order of importance on line item (d), while Part II is/are the significant conditions NOT relating to the underlying cause(s) in Part I. Comorbid conditions have been listed on Part I of death certificates as causes of death per the CDC Handbook since 2003 to ensure accurate reporting can be developed. Comorbidities are seldom placed in Part II. Part II is typically the section where coroners and medical examiners can list recent infections as underlying, initiating factors.

Prior to the CDC’s March 24th decision, any comorbidities would have been listed in Part I rather than Part II and initiating factors such as infections including the SARS-COV-2 virus, would have been listed on the last line in Part I or more commonly in Part II.

This quote implies that 94% of people classified as “COVID deaths” had an average of nearly 4 comorbidities–meaning they were very sick and dying from multiple causes. That makes 94% of deaths attributed to COVID-19, from the outset, highly questionable.

“Why would the CDC decide against using a system of data collection & reporting they authored, and which has been in use nationwide for 17 years without incident, in favor of an untested & unproven system exclusively for COVID-19 without discussion and peer-review? Did the CDC’s decision to abandon a known and proven effective system also breach several federal laws that ensure data accuracy and integrity? Did the CDC knowingly alter rules for reporting cause of death in the presence of comorbidity exclusively for COVID-19? If so, why?”

“If the fatality data being presented by the CDC is illegally inflated, then all public health policies based upon them would be immediately null and void.”

(Source: COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective)

This paper from Dr. Henry Ealy’s team has been used as key evidence in numerous lawsuits in the US. It has also served as the basis for the Beckman Vs. HHS federal case against the Human Health Services and CDC. You can see the press release here.

One would think that a federal case charging the Human Health Services and the CDC with death certificate fraud would be a bombshell of a news story. But a cursory search of the web reveals a total blackout in the mainstream media. My sense is that this is not an accident.

To get a sense of what all this means. The correction of death counts is anticipated to be significant but may be a large as the graphic below:

Graph Source: COVID-19: Restoring Public Trust During A Global Health Crisis

Without even getting into the PCR testing fraud (the “test” used to confirm COVID cases, a topic that is a whole other can of worms), the chart shows that the death rates from COVID may have been exaggerated greater than 16(x) times the actual amount, just based on death certificate fraud alone.

To put this in perspective: we have an actual amount of possible COVID deaths, probably a small fraction of the ~300,000 claimed, possibly as low as ~18,785 deaths. And examining the problems with the PCR testing fraud (see the next blog post), even this remaining number is questionable.

Each year more than 480,000 people in the US die from cigarettes (Source). Look at that number compared to the alleged COVID deaths. If our priority was to save lives, we could save a lot more people by banning the manufacture and sale of cigarettes, without all of the collateral damage of destroying people’s lives with lockdowns. But we should be aware by now that the COVID nonsense (masking, social distancing, lockdowns, etc.) has nothing to do with health. These measures are used for social control and economic warfare against the lower and middle class (more on that in a future blog post).

Each year in the USA, 659,041 people die from heart disease and 599,601 die from cancer (Source). But we don’t shut the country/world down for that. And why is the government doing nothing to address real epidemics like Autism Spectrum Disorder? Why is there not monumental international coordination to stop 5G in space? Why do we not put an end to real existential threats to life on Earth, such as dangerous forms of artificial electromagnetic radiation emitted by cell phones, WiFi, cell towers, “Smart” meters, etc. ? Why don’t regulatory authorities ban neonicotinoids and glyphosate (Round-Up), which undoubtedly is more dangerous than COVID?

Read the rest here: escapeempire.travel.blog

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.