Coronavirus: A Perspective from Britain Part 4

Written by Andy Rowlands on April 14, 2020. Posted in Current News

Evidence of possible statistical malfeasance in official reporting of the COVID19 numbers is beginning to emerge. Andy Rowlands offers his latest report on the shenanigans in Britain, below.

This article has some more information I have become aware of in the last two weeks, and some disturbing developments in the ‘official’ figures for the spread of the Covid19 virus.

I check Worldometer each day, and found at the start of this week, the only country with the mild / severe cases showing is China, where cases are falling.

Every country with rising numbers has had those charts removed, so now we cannot see how many cases are mild and how many are serious / critical in each country.

I also now find the UK numbers for critical cases shot up from 163 on April 4^th, to 1559 on the 5^th, while recoveries remained unchanged for over two weeks at 135 until April 11^th, when it was finally changed to 344. If these UK figures are accurate, this suggests a 90{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} mortality rate in Britain whether you have a mild case or not. Do readers find this credible?

You can check it out yourself here:-

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

It seems to me this is a deliberate attempt to mislead the public how ‘serious’ this virus is. I cannot think of any other reason why those charts would be removed, other than to frighten and / or mislead the public.

I was made aware of this website a few days ago. The Office for National Statistics [1]

It has some interesting information and I have lifted the following quotes from it –

‘A total of 138,913 deaths were registered in England and Wales between 28 December 2019 and 20 March 2020 (year to date), and of these, 108 involved COVID-19 (0.1{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}); including deaths that occurred up to 20 March but were registered up to 25 March, the number involving COVID-19 was 210.’ (Emphasis added)

‘Because of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, our regular weekly deaths release now provides a separate breakdown of the numbers of deaths involving COVID-19. That is, where COVID-19 or suspected COVID-19 was mentioned anywhere on the death certificate, including in combination with other health conditions. If a death mentions COVID-19, it will not always be the main cause of death, it will sometimes be a contributary factor.’ (Emphasis added)

‘These figures are different from the daily surveillance figures on COVID-19 deaths published by Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) on the GOV.UK website, for the UK as a whole. Figures in this report are derived from the formal process of death registration and may include cases where the doctor completing the death certificate diagnosed possible cases of COVID-19, for example, where this was based on relevant symptoms but no test for the virus was conducted. Our figures also include any deaths that occur outside hospital. In contrast to the GOV.UK figures, we include only deaths registered in England and Wales, which is the Office for National Statistics’ legal remit.’ (Emphasis added)

‘A death can be registered with both Covid-19 and Influenza or Pneumonia mentioned on the death certificate, therefore a death may be counted in both categories.’ (Emphasis added)

This means deaths are probably being counted multiple times, giving rise to misleading numbers, and some deaths attributed to the virus are assumptions.

The video below confirms much of what I wrote above. In it, Montana physician Dr. Annie Bukacek discusses how COVID 19 death certificates are being altered to change the cause of death to Covid-related deaths, thus making the virus appear much more virulent than it is.

I was also shown this chart a few days ago, produced by the US National Center for Health Statistics. It shows the number of deaths in the US from pneumonia and influenza from 2013 to the present.

As you can see, the number of pneumonia & flu deaths have dropped dramatically this year in the US. This doesn’t mean there have suddenly been far fewer cases, it means deaths formerly attributed to pneumonia and flu are now being attributed to the Covid virus.

For some reason, last week the other, perhaps more accurate website; covidly.com, reduced the number of recoveries in the UK from 205 to 192, then later in the day, put it up to 209. As of the time of writing; April 11^th, covidly is showing 588 UK recoveries. I am still of the opinion the UK recovery figure is being kept artificially low so that the general public, who probably don’t know how to read the charts properly, will be frightened into staying indoors.

If you click on the graph icons on the right-hand side of the covidly site, you can see graphs for each country, but there is still nothing to show the number of mild vs serious cases. Covidly can be seen here:-

https://covidly.com/?fbclid=IwAR0Iw_WLniK5SGyCZbTBQXHxb1VDnlMEA4K5w3AWADkPdLRwhSaPw52gF3o

An Off-Guardian post on April 5^th revealed some concerning information. I include some quotes from the article:

‘Bizarre guidelines from health authorities around the world are potentially including thousands of deceased patients who were never even tested.

Essentially, Italy’s death registration process does not differentiate between those who simply have the virus in their body, and those who are actually killed by it. Given the amount of fear and panic Italy’s comparatively alarming numbers caused around the world, you would think other nations would be eager to avoid these same mistakes. (Emphasis added)

Surely all the other countries of the world are employing rigorous standards for delineating who has, and has not, fallen victim to the pandemic, right? Wrong.

In fact, rather than learning from Italy’s example, other countries are not only repeating these mistakes but going even further. In Germany, for example, though overall deaths and case-fatality ratio are far lower than Italy’s, their public health agency is still engaging in similar practice.

On March 20th the President of Germany’s Robert Koch Institute confirmed that Germany counts any deceased person who was infected with coronavirus as a Covid19 death, whether or not it actually caused death. (Emphasis added)

In the United States, a briefing note from the CDC’s National Vital Statistics Service read as follows: It is important to emphasise that Coronavirus Disease 19, or Covid-19, should be reported for all decedents where the disease caused or is presumed to have caused or contributed to death.’ (Emphasis added)

Presumed?

‘Are careful records being kept to separate “Covid-19” from “presumed Covid-19”? Are the media making sure they respect the distinction in their reporting? Absolutely not.

Government agencies all across the UK are doing the same thing. Northern Ireland’s HSC Public Health Agency is releasing weekly surveillance bulletins on the pandemic, in those reports they define a ‘Covid19 death’ as: individuals who have died within 28 days of first positive result, whether or not COVID-19 was the cause of death. (Emphasis added)

NHS England’s Office of National Statistics… are now including “provisional figures” which will be “included in the dataset in subsequent weeks”. This leaves them wide open to – either accidentally or deliberately – reporting the same deaths twice… (Emphasis added)

The official NHS guidance for doctors filling out death certificates is just as vague:

“If before death the patient had symptoms typical of COVID19 infection, but the test result has not been received, it would be satisfactory to give ‘COVID-19’ as the cause of death, and then share the test result when it becomes available…”

The government is telling doctors it is OK to list “Covid-19” as a cause of death when there is literally no evidence the deceased was infected. That means there are potentially huge numbers of “Covid19 deaths” that were never even tested for the disease. (Emphasis added)

By enacting this legislation the UK government has not only made false reporting of Covid19 deaths more likely, they actively removed the safeguards designed to correct it. Recording accurate fatality numbers in this situation is borderline impossible. This is, at best, totally irresponsible and at worst incredibly sinister. (Emphasis added)

At a time when good, reliable information is key to saving lives and preventing mass-panic, global governments are pursuing policies which make it near-impossible to collect that data, whilst stoking public fear. Due to these policies, the simple fact is we have no reliable way of knowing how many people have died from this coronavirus. We have no hard data at all. And governments and international organisations are going out of their way to keep it that way. It’s time we started asking why.’ (Emphasis added)

The article can be seen here:-

https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/05/covid19-death-figures-a-substantial-over-estimate/?fbclid=IwAR2QPFUCpZxYZconWk2XoKEy6llpxvJyZk-MJZkCa361SY-fC9Zq6jHTPPw

In 1972, shortly before his death, Saul Alinsky published his book Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals. In it is the page shown below, detailing eight ways of how best to subjugate and control a population, highlighted in yellow –

Does any of this ring a bell in the current situation?

On April 7^th, The Independent newspaper reported increasing numbers of mental health incidents are being reported to police during the lockdown, and Sergeant Simon Kempton of the Police Federation, said “…there are very early indications of an increase in suicide attempts and suicides…”

The article reported Chief Superintendent​ Paul Griffiths, president of the Police Superintendents’ Association, saying “If we continue the isolation strategies in place there is a risk that mental health issues will increase over the next weeks and months.”

The article can be seen here:-

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-suicide-rates-uk-mental-health-support-a9451086.html

Yesterday, the Financial Times reported there are already three million people in the UK going hungry because of the lockdown, and that is after just three weeks. The article can be seen here:-

https://www.ft.com/content/e5061be6-2978-4c0b-aa68-f372a2526826?accessToken=–sanitized–&sharetype=gift{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}3Ftoken{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}3D–sanitized–&fbclid=IwAR1UtZRCycuBji0iZ4BSiyZhDwbi6JQdLX_4LDa-8Kv_lwWtJLKpepAbu9E

It seems to me this whole thing is a deliberate misinformation campaign in the UK, designed to frighten the public, and make them afraid to leave their homes for any reason, as the ‘official’ figures suggest virtually everyone who catches it in the UK is dying, yet across the entire rest of the world, as of the time of writing, just 103,000 have died.

It should be remembered that all the ‘official’ figures are only for people admitted to hospital and who were tested to see if they have the virus.

But then again, maybe the whole idea is to try and restrict the public’s movements & contact with others, and shut down industry and economies in the West, and weaken the population. Extinction Rebellion are advocating keeping the current restrictions in place permanently. In a couple of months, those behind this have achieved exactly what the globalists and eco-fascists had failed to do with their climate scam in 20 years.

[1] https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.

Trackback from your site.