Colchicine Reduces Mortality in Acute Covid cases by 32%
During the early years of the pandemic the real front line was comprised of independent clinics and urgent care centers as major university hospitals offered no ambulatory protocols or programs to keep patients out of the hospital
Operation Warp Speed was too slow in the development of therapeutics with the exception of intravenous monoclonal antibodies, and later Paxlovid and Mulnupiravir as fairly unimpressive oral additions to the McCullough Protocol.
Most of the interest amongst physicians on the front line was the use of widely available generic medications. We had many small unfunded studies and occasional randomized trials, but not to the size needed to be conclusive.
Such a trial for acute COVID-19 for a drug would need to have >20,000 patients and a primary endpoint of adjudicated COVID-19 hospitalization and death. Thus with only small trials the only tool left is meta-analysis, a method of combining studies to evaluate the pooled effect size.
When there are many meta-analyses, they again need to be summarized. Gosling et al state:
Umbrella reviews (sometimes called ‘overview of systematic reviews’, ‘overview’, ‘review of reviews’, etc) are a new type of meta-evidence synthesis that has emerged in recent years to provide a bird’s eye summary on a wide body of evidence on a determinate topic.5 6
Overall, umbrella reviews provide a single document that synthesizes an extensive body of information that could not be generated within a single publication for feasibility reasons and that direct readers to the current best evidence.
Danjuma et al performed an umbrella review of the meta-analyses summarizing the oral colchicine trials in acute COVID-19. Colchicine has been in the McCullough Protocol since 2020. The authors main findings were:
We included eighteen meta-analyses (n = 199,932 participants) in this umbrella review. Colchicine exposure was associated with an overall reduction of about 32 percent in the risk of mortality (odds ratio 0.68, confidence interval [CI] 0.58-0.78; I2 = 94 percent, p = 0.001).
Further examination of pooled estimates of mortality outcomes by the quality effects model (corrected for the methodological quality and risk of bias of the constituent reviews) reported similar point estimates (OR 0.73; CI 0.59 to 0.91; I2 = 94 percent).
This is great news for those who were prescribed and took colchicine during the acute phase particularly early in the pandemic.
The drug reduces inflammation in the chest and is commonly used now for myopericarditis, long-COVID, and other vaccine injury syndromes.
Colchicine has a well-characterized safety profile.
See more here substack.com
Header image: Pharmacy Direct GB
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
VOWG
| #
So, it is good for the flu.
Reply
Wisenox
| #
Colchicine is a microtubilin targeting agent and a drug delivery system.
Colchicine has numerous drug interactions, crosses breast milk and dissociates the pregnancy ‘wet-weight’ and cGMP responses that induce uterine wall morphological changes.
In male fertility studies, participants who took antihelminths, antifungals and colchines were excluded because they wanted ‘healthy’ subjects.
Seems like they promote an awful lot of drug delivery systems lately. These are drugs with certain areas on their molecules that allow for the attachment of another agent. The delivery systems work, because certain drugs target certain areas in the body.
This means that it is important to know what areas the drug delivery systems target.
Recent insider-promoter drug delivery systems include weight loss pills, antifungals, and antihelminth drugs.
Think ozempic, natamycin and Ivermectin.
They do love their DDS agents, but they don’t like telling you what they are for.
Fake covid was asymptomatic, so the vaccine should be as well. If it is not, then taking medicines to alleviate side effects masks the real problems causing them underneath. The subconscious is fooled into associating the effects with phony covid instead of the shot.
Covid is fake, so if you have side effects, what is really causing them?
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Anything can “treat” any illness that does not exist, like COVID-19; one does not need publications or experts to support such claims.
https://bioanalyticx.com/covid-19-a-textbook-case-of-incompetency-and-ignorance/
Reply
herb
| #
MASSIVE FRAUD: Evidence shows that covid data is 100% false
EXPOSING GLOBAL COVID FRAUD
It is hard to believe that such a global deception could occur, yet the evidence is all here. Thousands of medical doctors, nurses, and patients around the world testify of completely false covid registrations. Funeral directors confirm countless false death certificates.
Check the evidence for yourself…
https://stopworldcontrol.com/fraud/
Reply