Climate Alarmists Now Attack Growing Your Own Food
Allotment produce, much prized by proud food-growing citizens the world over, has six times the ‘carbon’ footprint of conventional agriculture, according to a recent paper published by Nature
“Steps must be taken to ensure that urban agriculture supports, and does not undermine, urban decarbonisation efforts,” demand the authors.
What have these people been smoking? Surely not some of the puff circulating at the recent Psychedelic Climate Week in New York.
Highlights included a discussion on funding ketamine-assisted therapy and a panel on ‘Balancing Investing and Impact with Climate and Psychedelic Capital’.
The lead authors of the Nature paper are academics working out of the School for Environment and Sustainability at the University of Michigan. They suggest using urban farms as sites for “education, leisure and community building”.
Perhaps the locals could sit cross-legged and listen to early Pink Floyd music. Maybe clap the setting sun to some Atom Heart Mother.
Excuse your correspondent if he cannot take this paper seriously. It is a classic example of ‘greens’ picking on a human activity – almost any will do – and complaining that it causes the devil-gas carbon dioxide to be released.
At the recent New York climate happening, according to the Guardian, revellers were told that using hallucinogens can spark “consciousness shifts” to inspire ‘climate-friendly behaviour’.
What climate friendly behaviour, one might ask, given that almost anything humans do to improve their lot of Earth is demonised by an increasingly weird millenarian ‘green’ cult.
The authors of the Nature paper seem to have a particular down on home composting. Poorly-managed composting is said to exacerbate the release of ‘greenhouse gases’. “The carbon footprint of compost grows tenfold when methane-generated anaerobic conditions persist in compost piles,” it says.
This is particularly common during small-scale composting, apparently. With a seeming complete ignorance of how small allotments farming functions, the authors suggest that “cities can offset this risk by centralising compost operations for professional management”.
Wherever these cultists look, there are gases being released that are contributing to their invented existential climate crisis. The high application rates of compost in urban agriculture can also lead to nitrous oxide, we’re told.
Needless to say, “strategic management of application scheduling and fertiliser combinations may be required to minimise emissions”.
For allotment holders, few pleasures in life compare with a break from arduous work and a hot cup of tea in the shed. Surrounded by the tools of the trade, it is the labourer’s equivalent of passing around a few liveners at National Climate Week, with the added attraction that it doesn’t turn you into a self-important dope.
But such pleasure will come to an end if the climate cops have their way. Infrastructure, we’re told, is the largest driver of ‘carbon’ emissions at what are termed “low-tech” urban agricultural sites.
As well as sheds, this includes beds (for vegetables, not a crash pad for ketamine heads) and compost facilities. A raised bed built and used for five years will have approximately four times the environmental impact as one used for 20.
Other infrastructure supplies are said to include fertiliser, gasoline and weed block textile.
Plants need water, but only the ‘right’ sort of water can help ‘save the planet’.
In their site samples, the researchers found that most allotment-holders use potable municipal water sources or groundwater wells. Big no, no, of course, since such irrigation emits ‘GHG’s from pumping, water treatment and distribution.
“Cities should support low-carbon (and drought-conscious) irrigation for urban agriculture via subsidies for rainwater catchment infrastructure, or through established guidelines for greywater use,” it is suggested.
Presumably, the subsidies will come from the magic bread tree and the infrastructure will be of the special type that does not produce ‘GHG’s.
This crackpot climate paper is just the latest sign that the ‘green’ movement is riven with disagreements as its climate crisis grift starts to fall apart in the face of reality.
There are no realistic back-ups for intermittent wind and solar, while ‘carbon capture’ is a colossal and potentially dangerous waste of money.
Without hydrocarbon use, humankind is doomed. Billions will die and society will be returned to the dark ages.
Hydrocarbons are ubiquitous in modern society, and so almost everything that humans do to survive and thrive can be demonised.
Eventually, you end up with Sir David Attenborough making the appalling observation that it was “barmy” for the United Nations to send bags of flour to famine-stricken Ethiopia.
Or to read earlier this year the tweet from the UN contributing author and UCL professor Bill McGuire that the only “realistic way” to avoid catastrophic climate breakdown is to cull the human population with a high fatality pandemic.
Many ‘green’ extremists seem to take the view that anything humans do, including growing their own veg, is causing existential harm to the planet.
What they really hate, some may conclude, are humans themselves.
See more here dailysceptic.org
Header image: allotment-garden.org
Editor’s note: that last line reminds me of what should be a well-known quote from the Club of Rome some years ago: “The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself”.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Allan Shelton
| #
Great. Six times the carbon footprint means more CO2 plant food.
Will the AGW morons ever smarten up???
Reply
Chris*
| #
There I was thinking they would have a problem with the tiny brick paths and the tiny tin sheds. It all sounds like jealousy.
Reply
whats next canada
| #
1 Year ago approximately CBC news radio does an article.
Roughly: We really shouldn’t be growing our own food. The soils are contaminated by various pollutants including metals from ? . The rainwater is of course contaminated by those very same pollutants. All these pollutants will be pick up by the your hard grown crop which you and your loving and of course very innocent family consume.
What is happening here, why is CBC setting this up. Why are other media groups trying to turn us away from our own food control.
Concurrently Bill Gates is buying vast( I mean vast) quantities of land in the United States agriculture land that is, the new black gold.
Here is the scam,,,, MR. G will start a veggie company lets see maybe yumyum joyjoy veggie company,,, something along those lines.
I can hear it now,,,, For the very cleanest least polluted veggies- buy Yum Yum Joy Joy available online and at the finest retailers.
How can this work,,, its actually simple from a marketing point of view. The corporate farm(Mr.G) has the technology to clean the soil removing the evil pollutants the cost of cleaning of course is fractions of pennies per carrot.
Why is CBC and other media companies setting up the new narrative, they were told to.
P.S. 6 times the carbon footprint that’s foolish.
Reply
Mike J
| #
Instead of blue screen of death we’ll get the green fields of death
Reply
DouweH
| #
Nature is no longer a reputable or go to mag it used to be. Like most things that were good for you it to has been hijacked by the GREENies and GREEDY rich and co-habit this rock we all live on
Reply
VOWG
| #
Idiots who think CO2 is a problem are the problem. Their level of stupid to not be allowed out.
Reply