Climate Alarmism Leading To More Mental Trauma, Not The Weather
A recent news post at the Harvard School of Public Health “Understanding the mental health consequences of chronic climate change,” claims that ‘climate change’, which researchers dub “chronic,” is leading to negative mental health consequences for people around the world
Researchers claim that long-term, gradual changes to the environment are also traumatic. This is false.
While natural disasters can traumatize those who survive them, individual weather events cannot be causally linked to ‘climate change’.
Since environmental changes have always occurred throughout human history, Harvard’s new hypothesis is worthless or empty.
In reality, and especially in the Western world, it is frantic and alarmist media coverage that leads to self-reporting of ‘climate-related anxiety.
In answer to a question about gaps in what is known about how ‘climate change’ impacts mental health, researcher and assistant professor of social and behavioral sciences at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Christy Denckla said that we “already know a lot about the mental health effects of climate-related disasters like hurricanes and wildfires.”
Indeed, Climate Realism has on several occasions here, here, and here, for instance, refuted claims that suggest ‘climate change’, through the impact of natural disasters, is causing anxiety and other mental health problems.
The reality in those cases is that suffering through an extreme weather event during which lives and property may be lost definitely can be traumatic, no one would blame that trauma on ‘climate change’ had the media not told them the weather event was caused by it.
In one particularly egregious example, several news outlets back in 2023 reported on a study that analyzed individuals who survived the 2018 wildfire in Paradise, California, and found widespread diagnoses of PTSD, anxiety, and depression.
The researchers blamed those mental health problems on ‘climate change’. However ‘climate change’ did not cause the fire in Paradise, poor maintenance of power lines did.
Nor has the modest warming of the past century or so caused any statistically significant change in the number or severity of wildfires on Earth.
Data from NASA suggests that the amount of land lost to wildfires each year has declined substantially.
The same goes for hurricanes – there is no statistically significant trend in the number or severity of tropical cyclones and hurricanes.
This new research Harvard is reporting on further expands upon these previously debunked claims into even more nebulous territory.
In addition to blaming mental health issues on particular weather events, Denckla explains that “the most urgent research priority is to understand the mechanisms through which slower-moving aspects of climate change such as temperature variability, ecosystem shifts, and changes in precipitation affect mental health.”
She goes on to say that the effects of ‘climate change’ disproportionately impact particular populations, like “adolescents and children, indigenous communities, displaced migrants, economically marginalized groups, and nations and regions on the ‘frontline of the climate crisis’, such as Africa and countries most vulnerable to climate extremes.”
Indeed, the poor and people in the Third World are more impacted by natural disasters, in large part because they do not have storm-resilient infrastructure as wealthier parts of the world and have less access to good medical care, and the food abundance delivered by modern agricultural systems built on ‘fossil fuels’.
Meteorological drought, for example, in a small sub-Saharan tribal community without water storage and transport will produce more severe misery and harm than a similar drought for the people of a developed city like Phoenix, Arizona.
Denckla seems to suggest that modern warming is a novel situation that uniquely impacts human mental health, however, history demonstrates that human civilizations have always suffered from natural disasters and slowly changing ecosystems and landscapes.
Nature is never in stasis.
What is certain, however, is that ‘climate change’ alarmism is the overwhelming narrative ‘consensus’ pushed by mainstream media and activists.
Climate Realism responds to disinformation every day from the media, and despite occasionally acknowledging that the “catastrophe” angle taken on climate-related issues is going too far, they continue to double down.
It would be surprising if the constant battering by false and inflammatory climate news did not negatively impact the mental health of media-besotted adults and children, alike.
The ratcheting up of hysterical coverage, misleadingly linking damage from natural disasters to ‘climate change’, while harping on the fact no major climate policies are being passed, is leading to depression and anxiety about the future.
It would serve the mental health of the general public better if Harvard devoted some resources to an alternative study about how fearmongering by the media leads to mental health issues.
Better still if its scholars began following and promoting the data that shows that no ‘climate crisis’ is in the offing.
See more here climatechangedispatch
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Tom
| #
I have lived over 70 years in virtually the same area and I wish we could get a few good thunder storms like we used to have growing up. The last 6-7 summers have produced the wimpiest storms with little thunder and lightening. Scared of the weather? Fake global warming? Bring it on you climate freaks.
Reply