Claims Of Runaway Greenland Ice Melt Overblown
We have carefully read the definition of a “tipping point” as conveyed by the Potsdam Institute (PIK):
“It’s like a pencil that you push further and further over the edge of a table with your finger. First nothing happens – then it falls.” That’s what the PIK website says
Nothing can bring the pencil back to the table except a failure of gravity, which is not conceivable.
Then PIK lists various “elements” that are supposed to exhibit such behavior. To the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS), one finds:
There are indications that the tipping point, which leads to an almost complete loss of ice in the long term (about 10,000 years), could probably be reached at a global warming of just under 1.5°C (possible from 0.8°C global warming, at the latest at 3°C).“
Now there’s a paper on the subject that has appeared in “Nature“, which paints a different picture. It finds that even after a possibly “critical warming threshold” has been crossed, “the pencil does not fall down”:
We find several stable intermediate ice-sheet configurations … that return to the present-day state if the climate returns to present-day conditions.”
In addition, models often determine the warming in Greenland (the root of the evil) using the mean global warming rate and then apply an “Arctic amplification” factor to each warming to determine the temperature swing in Greenland.
The paper states:
Recently, it has been shown that the Arctic warms four times faster than the global average and thus substantially exceeds previous estimates and projections from climate models.
Arctic amplification of this magnitude would reduce the safe space for the GrIS substantially. However, surface temperatures around Greenland might not increase that severely in the future.”
Observations since 2000 now show that during this period, the warming of the Arctic is far from uniform:
The warming trends (in °C / year) since 2000 in the Arctic region. The figure was generated with the KNMI Climate Explorer.
The “Arctic amplification” in the Arctic strikes in large parts of its European part, but in Greenland, of all places, the observed trends are much lower, especially in the area in the south and center of the island, which is particularly vulnerable to “thawing”.
A constant factor, therefore, according to observations, is a further overestimation of the danger of the occurrence of “galloping ice melt” in Greenland.
The “Last Generation – before the tipping points” has perhaps been misled, not only with the characteristics of tipping points (the “falling pencil”) but also with the real dangers of the tipping elements.
See more here climatechangedispatch
Header image: NASA
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
VOWG
| #
Sure will be great when Greenland is green again.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi VOWG,
What I am waiting for is when a paper is published in Nature which explains (identifies) all the natural factors invoked when one day’s average temperature is several degrees greater, or lesser, then that of the day before, or after–hence the variability of NATURAL WEATHER.
Have a good day
Reply