CDC Reports 28x More Fully Vaxxed Than Unvaxxed Hospitalized With COVID
A new CDC study (inadvertently?) finds 28 times more fully vaccinated patients (5,213) were hospitalized with COVID from June to September than the unvaccinated with prior infection (189) in nine U.S. states.
The CDC was apparently hoping this study would demonstrate the superiority of vaccination relative to natural immunity from a prior infection so they could compel more Americans to get vaccinated. It may have backfired.
Out of 201,269 people hospitalized with “COVID-19-like illness” from January to September (2021) in 9 states, just 1,020 (0.5 percent) of the hospitalizations occurred in unvaccinated people previously infected with COVID. This is a remarkably small number considering the CDC has estimated 120.2 million Americans (36.8% of the US population) had already been infected with COVID by late May.
Out of these 1,020 unvaccinated COVID patients landing in the hospital from January to September, 89 (8.7 percent) had tested positive for COVID a second time. The CDC interpreted this to mean natural immunity was less protective against re-infection with symptomatic COVID than vaccination because the percentage of infected fully vaccinated people in the hospital was 5.1 percent, or 1.7 times less.
But the rather hidden internals of the paper reveal a remarkable statistic: there were 27.6 times more (5,213 vs. 189) fully vaccinated than unvaccinated patients with COVID who needed to be hospitalized from June to September.
Considering the prevalence of infection in the U.S. (probably 40-45 percent of the U.S. population had been infected by June to September if prevalence was 37 percent by late May), there is little likelihood there were 28 times more people vaccinated than already infected.
This would appear to contradict the very vaccination-reduces-hospitalization conclusion the CDC had intended to emphasize in the first place.
UK: 90 percent of new infections and 89 percent of deaths over 70 are in the fully vaccinated
During weeks 38 to 41 (October), 2021, the UK Health Security Agency reports there were 117,882 of 130,904 (90 percent) new COVID cases identified in people aged 40 to 49 years old and fully vaccinated.
And the fully vaccinated were 2.2 times more likely to be infected with COVID (1,731.3 vs. 772.9 new cases per 100,000) than the unvaccinated in the 40-49 age group. Also, the fully vaccinated were about 2 times more likely to be infected in age groups 50-59, 60-69, and 70-79. It was only in the under 30 age groups that the unvaccinated had higher infection rates than the vaccinated.
The latest report for weeks 39 to 42 indicates 2,333 of 2,621 (89 percent) COVID deaths were in the fully vaccinated. Again, that’s nearly 9 of every 10 deaths.
This death percentage is slightly lower than the percentage of 70+ fully vaccinated (more than 90 percent), and thus the UKHSA has emphasized that the unvaccinated are more at risk with regard to probabilities. But this is little consolation in defending vaccine effectiveness when 89 percent of those dying are fully vaccinated.
Image Source: UK Health Security Agency
Three studies find vaccine effectiveness vanishes to zero percent after 5-7 months
In a study on vaccine effectiveness in hundreds of thousands of Qatar residents we learn that protection against infection peaks at 72.1 percent 4 to 5 weeks after the second dose, and then it rapidly declines to 0 percent (i.e., no more protection than the unvaccinated) within 140 days, or 20 weeks and later.
Image Source: Chemaitelly et al., 2021
Another study analyzed 11,889 infections in Israel and found infectiousness protection among the fully vaccinated “vanished” to the point there was no distinguishing the vaccinated from the unvaccinated within 180 days.
“[T]he viral load effectiveness declines with time post vaccination, significantly decreasing already after 3 months and effectively vanishing after about six months.”
Image Source: Levine-Tiefenbrun et al., 2021
A nation-wide study of Sweden’s mass vaccination campaign determined that vaccine effectiveness fell from 92 percent to 47 percent within 121-180 days after the second shot, and then “from day 211 and onwards no effectiveness could be detected.”
Image Source: Nordström et al., 2021
A disturbing study of 582 vaccine recipients (health care workers) found 48.4 percent were infected with COVID within 4 weeks after their first shot, and 25.3 percent were infected with COVID within 3 months after their second shot.
It’s as if these vaccines offer no protection at all.
Image Source: Ujjainiya et al., 2021
Natural immunity from a prior infection is better than vaccines
In contrast to the rapidly-waning protection offered by COVID’s “leaky” vaccines, a collection of 96 studies (as of 1 November) and counting compiled by an epidemiologist and 5 other MDs affirm a prior COVID infection (i.e., natural immunity) offers more and longer-lasting protection than vaccines do.
For example, according to a compendium of 54 studies involving over 12 million people, those who have already been infected with COVID are re-infected at a rate of only 0.2 percent (1 in 500) in the next 8 months after infection.
Image Source: Chivese et al., 2021
See more here: notrickszone.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Kent
| #
Has anyone found definitive proof of the reason(s) behind the global vaccine push? I have heard or read about everything from the “Great Reset” (“Build Back Better” and other socialist ideological mantra) to simply increasing the wealth of the pharmaceutical industry via the Medical Industrial Complex. It must fall somewhere within that spectrum–the government leaders are getting way too much of a rush out of their iron fists. I am just trying to make sense of it all.
Reply
R Lus
| #
https://www.unite4truth.com/post/thierry-baudet-exposes-the-rockefeller-foundation-in-parliament-pandemic-report-prediction-in-2010
Its for control of the monetary system and one world government to force everyone to have operate under a surveillance system with vaccine monitoring as the pretense for monitoring with no access to greater society or financial transactions without digital passports. And, ‘population control’, the polite name for mass genocide.
Reply
Richard Barr
| #
Where is the proof?why? You sound like a Trump supporter. All bluster and not a scintilla of proof for wild accusations
Reply
Unite 4Truth
| #
They are not hospitalized with Covid- they are hospitalized with a illness or condition attributed to Covid-19 through unscientific attribution standards based on a positive test test result expert panel peer review has deemed useless for detection of Sars CoV2. Covid-19 has been established as a disease of attribution to other cause. This is MSM talking point
https://www.oraclefilms.com/kevincorbett
Reply
ЯΞ√ΩLUT↑☼N
| #
Exactly. With the useless PCR test that can’t distinguish between live and dead virus RNA and also the fact that the CDC’s own report of July 2020 stating it had only fragments of non-isolated RNA of the original Bullshit-19 means that this “PCR test gold standard” is well and truly nonsensical. If they don’t have a full isolated sample of the original, then how are they even recognising “variants”? It’s all bullshit and I bet this whole thing is a hijacked and rebranded seasonal flu to sell quackxines every 6 months as booster for the term of everyone’s natural lives, all the while tracing their movements and punishing them through passports and social credits like China.
Reply
Tom O
| #
I honestly can’t see how you can call the PCR test “useless.” It has worked to perfection. The intent of the way this test was used was to scare the world’s population into submission, and it has been incredibly successful in accomplishing that.
It was intended to be used to allow governments to cut off services and privileges, and it has been incredibly successful in doing that as well.
This test was by far the most successful test ever devised for what it was intended – to turn the world population into slaves. It was designed to give a positive result for virtually any respiratory problem that would fit the symptom chart, and it was outstanding at that.
NO. This was not a “failed test” for intended use.
Reply
very old white guy
| #
I times past it would be called the flu, now it is whatever someone says it is.
Reply
Richard Noakes
| #
Mark McGowan Hospitals in Australia are being overrun. Not from Covid. And no one can explain why.
Alex Berenson 2 hr ago
544
So said Mark McGowan, the premier of Western Australia – which has almost 3 million people – in an interview with Sky News Australia on Sun., Oct. 31.
Here’s his exact quotation:
Our hospitals are under enormous pressure. This is the same in [the rest of Australia]. This has been something no one has ever seen before, the growth in demand in our hospitals, why it is is hard, hard to know… There is huge numbers of people coming through the door, so we’re doing everything we can to try to manage it.
To be clear, Covid is not causing the hospital crisis in Western Australia. The state has incredibly strict border restrictions, even by Australian standards, and almost no cases.
But – like the rest of Australia – it has very high vaccination rates.
It’s past time to start asking what is going on.
You can see McGowan’s comments for yourself here:
twitter.com/justsee/status/1456215828345475081
RichardHYPERLINK “https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/the-hospitals-in-australia-are-being/comment/3496564” 3 min ago
Easy answer: Fully Vaccinated will develop Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome by Christmas
By The Exposé on October 27, 2021
The last 7 Public Health England / UK Health Security Agency ‘Vaccine Surveillance’ report figures on Covid-19 cases show that double vaccinated 40-79 year-olds have now lost lost 50% of their immune system capability and are consistently losing a further 5% every week (between 3.9% and 8.8%).
Projections therefore suggest that 40-79 year-olds will have zero Covid / Viral defence at best, or a form of vaccine mediated acquired immunodeficiency syndrome at worst, by Christmas and all double vaccinated people over 30 will have completely lost that part of their immune system which deals with Covid-19 within the next 13 weeks.
By a concerned reader
The 7 Public Health England (PHE) / UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) tables below from their excellent Vaccine Surveillance reports of all fully genome sequenced Delta variant cases, separated by 6 weeks, clearly show the progressive damage that the vaccines are doing to the immune response of the double vaccinated. PHE / UKHSA have done so much great work and are continuing to paint an extremely clear picture.
Weekly Decline in Double Vaccinated Immune System Performance compared to Unvaccinated People
Vaccine effectiveness is measured using Pfizer’s vaccine effectiveness formula –
(Unvaccinated case rate – Vaccinated case rate / the Larger of Unvaxxed or Vaxxed case rate)
We are using the normalised absolute ratio of vaxxed to unvaxxed case numbers to determine vaccine efficiency just as Pfizer itself does.
A Vaccine effictiveness of +50% means that double vaccinated people are 50% more protected from Covid than unvaccinated people. It means that the Delta case rate in the vaccinated is half the Delta case rate in the unvaccinated.
A Vaccine effectiveness of -50% means that unvaccinated people are 50% more protected from Covid than double vaccinated people. It means that the Delta case rate in the vaccinated is double the Delta case rate in the unvaccinated.
A Vaccine effectiveness of 0% means that doubly vaccinated people are 0% more protected from Covid than unvaccinated people. It means that the Delta case rate in the vaxxed equals the Delta case rate in the unvaxxed. It means the vaccines have lost all their effectiveness.
Everybody over 30 will have lost 100% of their entire immune capability (certainly for Covid and most likely for viruses and certain cancers – following the evidence from Cole Diagnostics in Idaho and Dr Nathan Thompson and Dr Ralph Baric) within 13 weeks.
Double vaccinated 30-49 year olds will have lost it by Christmas. These people will then have no immune defence to Covid at all.
Unless a cure is found quickly they may well die (as occurred at the start of the AIDS epidemic).
“In individuals aged greater than 30, the rate of positive COVID-19 test is higher in vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated”. – PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report for week 41.
“There is the potential for ADE, but the bigger problem is probably Th2 immunopathology,” says Ralph Baric, an epidemiologist and expert in coronaviruses—named for the crown-shaped spike they use to enter human cells—at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
In previous studies of SARS, aged mice were found to have particularly high risks of life-threatening Th2 immunopathology in which a faulty T cell response triggers allergic inflammation, and poorly functional antibodies that form immune complexes, activating the complement system and potentially damaging the airways.”.
The falling efficacy of the vaccines does not asymptotically approach zero (which would mean that vaccines merely lose effectiveness over time). It goes straight through zero and then goes dangerously negative (which means the vaccines become toxic to the immune system). Then it becomes increasingly negative in a linear manner week on week. If this continues then the vaccines will completely destroy the part of your immune system which deals with Covid by the end of January.
This may well result in more cases of Shingles, HPV, Herpes, Epstein Barr, Endometriosis and other viral infections – https://www.nbc12.com/2021/10/15/reports-shingles-outbreaks-not-directly-linked-covid-19-vaccine/
HARRISONBURG, Va. (WHSV) – There have been case studies showing people are experiencing recurrences or outbreaks of shingles after getting the COVID-19 vaccine. Local doctors say that is rare and not necessarily caused by the vaccine.
“I’ve seen a lot of shingles recently, but I haven’t seen it associated with the vaccine personally. That’s my personal experience,” Dr. Jennifer Derby, a family physician with Sentara RMH, said. (2021October15)
The vaccine booster shots have to be the same as the vaccines themselves, because it takes forever to do clinical trials and get approval for something different. So if you take a booster shot, these figures show that you are giving yourself an even faster progressive form of AIDS (after an initial few months of effectiveness). The risk benefit analysis for these vaccines has now become a risk detriment analysis for everyone over 30.
Table 2. COVID-19 Cases by Vaccination Status
The immune system boost or degradation column, which is the vaccine efficiency/inefficiency column, column10, is calculated from Pfizer’s vaccine efficiency formula of
U-V/U for U>V
U-V/V for V>U
which formula they used to claim 95% vaccine efficiency against Wuhan alpha.
Cases reported by specimen date between week 32 and week 35 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1016465/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_36.pdf
Cases reported by specimen date between week 33 and week 36 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1018416/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_37_v2.pdf
Cases reported by specimen date between week 34 and week 37 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1019992/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_38.pdf
Cases reported by specimen date between week 35 and week 38 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1022238/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_39.pdf
Cases reported by specimen date between week 36 and week 39 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1023849/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_40.pdf
Cases reported by specimen date between week 37 and week 40 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1025358/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-41.pdf
Cases reported by specimen date between week 38 and week 41 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1027511/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-42.pdf
If the case numbers of the vaccinated simply converged and met up with the case numbers of the unvaccinated then the vaccine would have merely lost its effectiveness and the tables would all be green and the vaccine efficiency would be ZERO.
But that did not happen. The vaccinated case numbers are now twice the unvaccinated case numbers per 100k people, and the tables have all gone red.
That means the vaccine have not merely lost their efficiency. They have not merely stopped working. They are still very much working. But they are working against your immune system rather than for it. They are suppressing your immune response. They are damaging your immune system. They are causing it to become worse than if you had not taken the vaccine. They are toxic to your immune system. They are not merely ineffective. They are negatively effective.
The inescapable immunological conclusion from this data is that the case rate being higher in the vaccinated means that the immune system is lower in the vaccinated.
This suggests that the vaccines are damaging the immune response, which in turn suggests that the vaccines are damaging the immune system, therefore making the immune system deficient.
This suggests that the vaccines are giving people vaccine mediated immune deficiency, which therefore suggests the vaccines are giving people a form of AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome).
What is so remarkable is the speed and the consistency of the immunological degradation.
Choosing your Formula
The Immune System boost/degradation column is a measure of the boost or damage to your immune system – see report
The Vaccine Efficacy % for double vaccinated column shows how much more or less resistant to Covid the double vaccinated are than the unvaccinated – see report
So if you are 40 years old and double vaccinated then your immune response is now degraded by 55.4%. This means that unvaccinated 40 year olds are 55.4% less likely to catch Covid than the doubly vaccinated. Whilst double vaccinated 40 year olds are 124% more likely to catch Covid than the unvaccinated.
You can look at it either way. It just depends whether your chosen parameter is the doubly vaccinated or the unvaccinated. But whichever one you choose, the outlook this winter for those who have been fully vaccinated with the experimental Covid-19 injections looks terrible.
The Expose
Me: Then think of all of those kids 5 years old and up about to be vaccinated?
Reply
Richard Noakes
| #
In case you missed it “The vaccine booster shots have to be the same as the vaccines themselves, because it takes forever to do clinical trials and get approval for something different. So if you take a booster shot, these figures show that you are giving yourself an even faster progressive form of AIDS (after an initial few months of effectiveness). The risk benefit analysis for these vaccines has now become a risk detriment analysis for everyone over 30.
“So if you take a booster shot, these figures show that you are giving yourself an even faster progressive form of AIDS (after an initial few months of effectiveness”
Reply
Richard Noakes
| #
Might be an idea for anyone in Australia to send this to Mark McGowan for his information, especially if he has been vaccinated
Reply
Tom
| #
Just more lying garbage from the skunks at the CDC. The truth is that most of the hospitalized are suffering major damage from the mRNA injections, not wimpy, fake covid.
Reply
very old white guy
| #
How do we know that small number were previously infected when there is no accurate test for “covid”?
Reply
Alan
| #
This article reproduces Table 2 of the UK Health Security Agency covid surveillance report for week 42 showing the cases and the infection rates. The infection rates are higher in the vaccinated group and a check on other weeks shows that the infection rate for the vaccinated has been increasing with time.
I have the reports to week 40 and I was prompted to look at the weeks following. The rather inconvenient fact of higher infection rates among the vaccinated has obviously been noted by the Agency, so they have done the obvious and removed the infection rates from Table 2 from week 43. This government will do anything to coverup the truth.
Reply