Catching a Cold Might Prevent a Severe Case of COVID-19
Common Cold Antibodies Protect Against COVID-19
A new study investigated whether preexisting antibodies from common cold viruses offered protection against COVID-19. Researchers analyzed blood samples from 94 unvaccinated hospitalized patients with varying severity of respiratory failure; 74 had tested positive for COVID-19, while 20 didn’t have the infection.
They measured levels of antibodies from prior common cold coronavirus infections. The same analysis was done for non-COVID-19 patients as controls.
There was a positive correlation between common cold antibody levels and COVID-19-specific antibodies. Higher common cold antibody levels in the control patients suggested a potentially protective effect against COVID-19 severity.
‘Original Antigenic Sin’
The concept of “original antigenic sin” (OAS) was first coined in the 1960s. It refers to how initial flu exposures shape immunity against later, related strains, sometimes trapping the immune system in a way that leaves it unable to adapt to new variants of a virus. This can leave people more vulnerable to a given virus.
Since then, research has shown these original imprints can influence susceptibility to other infections.
This phenomenon may also apply to COVID-19 and common colds, Dr. Thomas Gut, an internal medicine doctor with the Post-COVID Recovery Center at Staten Island University Hospital, told The Epoch Times.
“It’s been up for debate for quite some time whether preexisting colds … offer a protective effect for being exposed to COVID or whether it somehow makes it higher-risk when they’re exposed to COVID,” he said.
These latest findings suggest that any prior corona-type virus—the common cold or the virus that causes COVID-19—is unlikely to heighten susceptibility, Dr. Gut said.
Did Childhood Colds Help Africa Evade COVID-19’s Worst?
There’s an intense debate around whether endemic common colds impact susceptibility to severe COVID-19 outcomes, according to a review of the study. However, some speculate that childhood cold exposure partly explains Africa’s milder pandemic impact through cross-protection.
Of the 250 participants, more than 83 percent had prior exposure to common cold coronaviruses. The study found that their infection-fighting white blood cells cross-reacted to the virus that causes COVID-19.
This suggests that people who were previously exposed to these genetically related coronaviruses have immune responses that are protective against future SARS-CoV-2 infections, Bobby Brooke Herrera, assistant professor of global health at Rutgers Global Health Institute and lead author of the study, said in a statement. He noted the study’s unique baseline data from early in the pandemic, before vaccination started.
Now that most people have existing COVID-19 antibodies, either from vaccination or infection, it’s difficult to find an unexposed population for comparison, underscoring the value of early pandemic data.
Early Exposures Shape Kids’ Viral Defenses: Study
A 2023 study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences analyzed pre-pandemic blood samples from children and adults, along with samples from COVID-19 recoverees.
The research found that children as young as 2 had already developed immunity to several viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. However, these protective cells decreased with age.
“These reactions are especially strong early in life and grow much weaker as we get older,” Annika Karlsson, study corresponding author and research group leader at the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, said in a statement.
This may explain why children tend to get milder COVID-19 cases than adults.
Source: Epoch Times
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
VOWG
| #
The flu, the common cold, “covid’, has anyone seen the correlation? All the same.
Reply
Tom
| #
These bozos have it all backwards. You do not catch a cold or flu. These things in all their variations are detoxing methods implored by the body. It’s basically the same for all of us and the degree of severity depends on the state of your bodily systems. There you go, scientists and doctors, you are now un-baffled.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
hi tom,
A day or two ago I asked you a question and you seem to not have answered. Because I am old and forget, I do not remember what the question was. I will try to find it and repeat it here because you seem to know everything.
Have a good day
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
I couldn’t find it and maybe you didn’t read this previous comment because someone had may a series of the same comments so none of the previous comments were listed a very long time.
Reply
nils-ola Holtze
| #
The virus theory is very suspect. But dismissing it with another dubious theory that the common cold is a detox has to be proven. Where is the evidence for the detoxification theory?
Reply
mehere
| #
Considering that it was rebranded flu to start with, is it surprising? Untested and unjabbed. 8:32. <:o)
Reply