Caltech project to create energy from beaming sunlight

Eight years ago another billionaire ploughed millions into space to harvest solar power and beam it back down to Earth

Billionaire Donald Bren was behind a quiet $100m donation in 2013 that established Caltech’s Space-based Solar Power Project (SSPP) in an attempt to harness solar power from outer space, the California private research university revealed this week.

The real estate magnate was inspired by a 2011 article in Popular Science (perhaps this one?). He also knew a thing or two concerning power distribution problems from his experience master planning cities like Irvine, California.

Bren subsequently approached Caltech to discuss his ideas. Caltech said he has no stake in the tech and won’t make any money from it. The donation is being disclosed now, eight years later, as SSPP wants to highlight upcoming project milestones.

In early 2023, the org is launching technology demonstrating prototypes that collect and convert sunlight to electrical energy, transferring the energy wirelessly using RF and a deployable 6x6ft ultralight structure that integrates the power.

By integrating the solar power and RF conversion into one element, SSPP says the spacecraft avoids a power distribution network, mitigating localised failure and making the structure scalable.

The SSPP website describes the benefit of using solar power harnessed in outer space, which essentially boils down to a lack of shade and night-time hours that we Earthlings are forced to endure:

Collecting solar power in space and transmitting the energy wirelessly to Earth through microwaves enables terrestrial power availability unaffected by weather or time of day. Solar power could be continuously available anywhere on earth.

Previous prototypes were launched in 2017. In May, a prototype with 1.5kg/m2 areal density collected solar power and transmitted it to Caltech. Seven months later, photovoltaics and power transfer circuitry were added to the even lighter design (1 kg/m2 areal density) and beam steering was incorporated.

The idea of space solar panel tech has been around a while but its measurable potential is continually improving. In 1941, science-fiction writer Isaac Asimov described space stations transmitting solar energy via microwave beams in his short story Reason. In the early 1970s, Peter Glaser got a patent for a design to transmit power from satellite to ground using microwaves.

In the late ’70s, NASA explored the concept with the US Department of Energy and revisited it in 1999 through the Space Solar Power Exploratory Research and Technology program (SERT). A year prior, in 1998, Japan’s space agency (JAXA) began developing a space solar power system. That programme still runs today.

More recently, the US Naval Research Laboratory conducted its first test of solar power generation in a satellite in May 2020 to gauge process efficiency. The research laboratory’s PRAM-FX harvests and converts solar energy using a 12-inch square tile surface.

Should the Bren-funded SSPP continue to succeed with its technology demonstrations and tests, it may be another six years before the world sees it applied for usable applications from what is hopefully affordable, renewable clean energy.

See more here: theregister.com

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (10)

  • Avatar

    Herb Rose

    |

    So Caltech is willing to accept money to find a way to increase the amount of solar energy striking the Earth. I bet they would also be willing to accept money from another brainless billionaire (Bill?) to find a way to decreases the amount of solar energy striking the Earth.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Joseph Olson

    |

    “Green Prince of Darkness Exposed” at principia-scientific.org
    Photovoltaic cells are a crude, one time, one way, molecule erosion process that never returns a fraction of the energy required for manufacturing. Beaming microwaves back to Earth will create a GIANT, NO FLY, KILL ZONE. This is green kool-aid madness to the max.

    “Planet of the Humans” documentary by Michael Moore on unsustainable Green agenda

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Howdy

      |

      “Must watch” video, Joseph.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    sir_isO

    |

    So, death rays?

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Howdy

      |

      That’s a definite possibility osiris.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Howdy

    |

    “what is hopefully affordable, renewable clean energy.”
    I wouldn’t say it was instilling confidence.

    Presumably, there will need to be redundant arrays of these transmitters to each receiving area, which itself will need redundancy, otherwise you need backup, and we understand where the only feasible backup comes from allready. That means even greater monetary costs than just putting the idea itself into practice. Heaven knows what that will be. The hope of being affordable is squarely based on one’s means and in practice, is redundant.

    I must admit, I see something of a pipe dream going on at this stage, but in the line of ideas put forward to create clean “renewable” energy, nowhere near the worst. Time will tell.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Herb Rose

    |

    In order to avoid night the collector must be orbiting the sun, not the Earth. Its distance must be kept constant so its microwave can be focused on targets as the Earth rotates under it at a distance where it is not affected by Earth’s gravity. (further away than the moon). It must have multiple receiving stations to receive the power and because of the distance from Earth, the output must be in the form of a laser to prevent the power being spread over a large area.
    The whole concept belongs in science fiction and is nonsense, just like those who think we should put a satellite in stationary orbit and attaching hoist to lift other objects into orbit.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      howdy

      |

      “just like those who think we should put a satellite in stationary orbit and attaching hoist to lift other objects into orbit.”
      Not heard that one Herb. Had I not been aware of all the craziness going on I would have said that claim defies belief. However, I can say I’m not surprised.
      The fact over-use of technology is causing a devolution of common sense, and notwithstanding the sheer amount of propulsion required to maintain position under load, plus fuel reserves and solar energy needed to do that, I wouldn’t place It in the realms of impossibility that it materializes.

      I reckon there is one organization that might attempt it.

      Reply

    • Avatar

      sir_isO

      |

      Or it’s a cover for actual death rays.

      Reply

      • Avatar

        sir_isO

        |

        You know, considering they’re kinda pushing ufo stuff, EMF things…

        Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via