Call For Govt Action On ‘Dangers’ Of 5G

Written by Sean Carney on August 1, 2022. Posted in Current News

Did you know? There is a scandal. And it is very well explained in the video described with accessible information anyone can understand, showing how the government has u-turned on human rights and health since 2000, a year which heralded 2G and 3G wireless communications, but also promised science-based policies designed to protect the public from wireless radiation.

Precaution was the agreed policy, public health the rallying call, but now, in 2022, wireless networks are part of combatting “climate change”, and precautionary principle is sidelined. Clever marketing and shrewd lobbying has swayed the UK government. There is still no evidence we are safe being exposed to wireless radiation, including 4G and 5G.

The good news is, we can change this, but only if we act together and acknowledge the scandal, promote this video’s message, and pursue a solution, holding the government to account for protectionism, mismanaging public health and reimagining legislation to favour an unimpeded roll out of wireless 5G that hasn’t been proven safe for humans, wildlife, or the environment.

The government already faces legal action, but we need to put more pressure on them. Share this video to that end and send the message loud and clear that you want your human rights and health protected.

Right now, the UK government faces legal action over the 5G roll out? Since legal action was launched, the government has aimed to protect the roll out, and further the Internet of Things pertaining to all things digital. 5G is being forced upon people, for industry profits, power and state surveillance, through lobbying, legislation and policy.

Without any comprehensive risk assessment, of biological and environmental, or energy consumption impacts, 5G continues to be rolled and is branded as a benefit to all. There is no evidence it is safe, and in light of that, the precautionary principle should have been invoked, globally.

Since 2017 5G was slowly emerging, and protest and resistance to it was growing, especially in 2019, but the catalyst for 5G’s infrastructure roll out would be the “pandemic/post-pandemic” years of 2020-22, while society was locked down at home and movement was restricted for all but “essential” journeys.

The issue of the 5G roll out and its health implications collided with the Pandemic hysteria. Lockdowns were leveraged to justify advancement of the roll out globally, as people were isolated and sought increased connection and sustained employment by interfacing online in unprecedented numbers and frequency.

5G’s new spectrum and speed was played as the “future proof” solution and was also played as part of “Building Back Better” in the UK, as part of Net Zero and necessary to “economic recovery”. For a technology that hasn’t been proven safe, the public relations effort to convince citizens it is and that they must want it has been extraordinary. But do the public want it?

Did you know that the majority don’t want 5G? Or that humans and organic life, like bees and bacteria, are sensitive to radio frequency radiation? 20 years ago the UK government warned citizens to take precautions because radio frequency (wireless) devices, they said, could cause cancer. The Stewart Report made it clear precaution was needed in relation to exposure, and the W.H.O. would publish similar conclusions.

Today, the government backs industry claims that denser wireless 5G networks are necessary to combat “climate change” (even though a 5G wireless “clean-energy” world requires rare metals and burgeoning Deep Sea Mining and other projects that won’t tackle e-waste but only increase it). Evidently, these are desperate times for the wireless industry, which can be strongly implicated in widespread pollution from mining to exacerbating anthropogenic RFR emissions.

Are we protected? The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), which isn’t independent, as likes to claim, is favoured by industry with its thermal guidelines. The organisation’s exposure guidelines are used (in the US, Australia, UK, Europe and Canada) to protect people from thermal harm from the microwave frequencies.

Whether they protect everyone debatable. Such guidelines are useful to industry because they ignore the science pertaining to biological harm from radio frequency radiation. The guidelines also don’t take into account RFR exposure on the environment and ecosystems. They fall very short of any reliable risk assessment, or thorough science.

Clarity on the health, environmental and energy consumption issues surrounding 5G must prevail. This video is a very good starting point to inform yourself and do further research.

References:

rfinfo.co.uk/no-more-lies/

See more here: vimeo.com

Header image: The Telegraph

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.