California Doctor Treated over 1700 COVID Patients with ZERO Deaths
While the media continues pushing hype around the coronavirus, actual medical experts say we already have the tools we need to combat the virus. One America’s Pearson Sharp spoke with Brian Tyson, a doctor in Southern California who has successfully treated over 1,700 patients with the drug hydroxychloroquine.
https://youtu.be/PE3QfTnIazU
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
About the author: John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI). John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
tom0mason
| #
The drug hydroxychloroquine (with zinc, and vitamins D & C) appears from this evidence and many other doctors evidence, to be an excellent prophylaxis and treatment against the COVID virus! Why aren’t the UKs NHS doctors allowed to prescribe it to the most venerable and anyone else who asks for is. It would appear that the UK government is NOT interested in keeping the population health by allowing doctors to do their job. The government seems to want alarm, and looks as if they wish to bureaucratically impose ineffective but onerous restriction on the populous until some form of vaccination can be mandated.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Meanwhile on the sorry tale of the UK’s error riddled PCR testing regime there is —
Dr Clare Craig FRCPath — She is a Pathologist, lover of data, digital pathology and AI, sceptical but optimistic and tweets @ https://twitter.com/ClareCraigPath/status/1314792738789953539
And resent tweets say —
and
Also she notes —
With a link to the Reuters piece.
So ‘cases’ may still be rising in the UK — logically case should eventually reach 100% of the population! — but a proper scientific assessment of the current PCR tests, or the efficacy of lockout/lockdown HAS NOT BEEN DONE.
PCR positive test CAN NOT indicate infection as it’s NOT a diagnostic tool.
Reply
tom0mason
| #
Oops …
“Why aren’t the UKs NHS doctors allowed to prescribe it to the most venerable and anyone else who asks for is.
The ‘venerable’ should be ‘vulnerable’, and ‘ask for it’ (not ‘ask for is’)
So it should read something like this (hopefully I’ve not dyslexicated it again!).
Why aren’t the UKs NHS doctors allowed to prescribe it to the most vulnerable, and anyone else who asks for it .
Reply
Dean Michael Jackson
| #
Since there is no COVID-19, of course no one will be murdered by misdiagnosis.
This fake ‘pantasy’ was first attempted in 1918,[1] where the culprit was the toxic administration of aspirin (whose Bayer patent had lapsed in 1917) not a flu. Naturally those physicians who didn’t treat their patients with aspirin or vaccines had a near 100% recovery rate:
“In a plant of 8,000 workers we had only one death. The patients were not drugged to death. Gelsemium was practically the only remedy used. We used no aspirin and no vaccines.” – Frank Wieland, M.D., Chicago.
“I attended over one hundred cases without any fatalities…I never gave aspirin…” – G. H. Wright, M.D., Forest Glen, Md.
“I had 300 cases and one death; one good homeopathic had 275 cases and no deaths. I am a health officer of my city. One old school man had 294 cases and reported 15 deaths. Aspirin and Iodized lime were the remedies used by the old school.” – H. H. Crum, M.D., Ithaca, NY.
“I treated 455 cases of influenza and 20 cases of pneumonia with no deaths. Remedies: Gelsemium, Bryonia, Epis, etc.” – T. G. Barnhill, M.D, Findlay, Ohio.
“Murphy, of Lansing, Michigan, treated 325 cases of influenza in a camp where the mortality rate had been 20%, while the mortality rate under his homeopathic treatment was less than 3%.” – W. H. Wilson, M.D., Chicabo.
“In the month of October 1918 I treated, in round numbers, 200 cases of influenza without a death.” – W. R. Andrews, M.D., Mannington, W. Va.
“Dr. M. I. Boger of Portsmouth, N. H. treated 331 cases with two deaths. Dr. G. G. Bascom of Lake Wilson, Minn., 300 cases with no deaths.” – E. C. Price, M.D., Baltimore.
“In the Public Heath service in New Mexico among the Mexican population chiefly Veratrum viride, Gelsemium, and Bryonia were introduced and excellent results followed their use in influenza. No cases died under homeopathic medication.” – C. E. Fisher, M.D., Chicago.
“My low death rate at Camp Lee was due entirely to the fact that I avoided the use of Aspirin absolutely. I was complimented by the chief medical officer as having the lowest death rate in the hospital. After the medical chief had noted the effect of Aspirin on the blood and the results which I was having in using Homeopathy he discouraged the use of Aspirin and the death rate came down very rapidly after that ruling.” – Carleton A. Harkness, M.D., Chicago.
https://www.ecampnd.com/homeopathy/A_Chorus_of_Fifty_in_Harmony.pdf
At my blog, bead the articles…
‘House of Cards: The Collapse of the ‘Collapse’ of the USSR’
‘Playing Hide And Seek In Yugoslavia’
Then read the article, ‘The Marxist Co-Option Of History And The Use Of The Scissors Strategy To Manipulate History Towards The Goal Of Marxist Liberation’
Solution
The West will form new political parties where candidates are vetted for Marxist ideology/blackmail, the use of the polygraph to be an important tool for such vetting. Then the West can finally liberate the globe of vanguard Communism.
My blog…
https://djdnotice.blogspot.com/2018/09/d-notice-articles-article-55-7418.html
[1] But called off because Marxists couldn’t gain ground in the United States nor Europe as they had in Russia with the assistance of the World War I Allies:
The World War I Allies conspired to not immediately send a naval expedition to Petrograd to easily topple Lenin & Bolshevik’s November 7, 1917 coup, thereby promptly returning Russia to the war, Russia’s involvement in the war being a critical variable for the Allies’ victory strategy against the Central Powers, proving (a) that the Allies knew they were going to win the war; (b) that the war was set up to (i) weaken the West’s influence in the world; (ii) weaken the West’s people’s confidence in their institutions and what those institutions stood for; and (c) one objective of the war was to settle into power the first above board Marxist state, with more to follow. In fact, there already was an anti-Marxist force in Russia at the time that if ordered would have conquered all of Bolshevik Russia during this period when the Bolsheviks were very weak. The unit was the 60,000 strong Czechoslovak Legion (soon to be 100,000 strong) but instead of sending the legion 700 miles north to Petrograd, the Allies sent it on a 6,000 mile odyssey across Russia to Vladivostok for evacuation to Europe(!), once again proving the Allies knew they were going to win the war…that the war was a Marxist operation.
Even more telling is neutral Denmark’s laying mines off its coastal waters in international waterways in August, 1914 [thereby violating the 1857 treaty opening the Danish Straits to all shipping, where, “No ship of any kind may, under any pretext whatsoever, be subjected to detention or obstruction at the passage of the Sound or the Belts”] at the prompting of Germany (Germany too lays mines in the Danish Straits) and Great Britain does nothing! Not a word from the Allies (and the usual deafening silence from the Marxist co-opted press), in fact, even though access to the Baltic Sea is critical for the Allies to roll up Germany quickly by (a) closing the Baltic Sea to all German surface/subsurface vessels; (b) denying German access to trade with Sweden; (c) bringing the Royal Navy and the Imperial Russian Navy together; (d) forcing Germany to relocate critically needed infantry divisions and heavy armaments away from the Western Front for the new Baltic Front; (e) allowing British and Russian troop landings across the Baltic coasts, preventing German forces from moving eastwards towards Russia; thereby (f) knocking Germany out of the war before one shot is fired.
Reply