Busted: CDC Committed Criminal Fraud Over COVID19 Numbers!

 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stands accused of violating federal law by inflating Coronavirus fatality numbers, according to stunning information obtained by NATIONAL FILE.

CDC illegally inflated the COVID fatality number by at least 1,600 percent as the 2020 presidential election played out, according to a study published by the Public Health Initiative of the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge.

The study, “COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective,” was authored by Henry Ealy, Michael McEvoy, Daniel Chong, John Nowicki , Monica Sava, Sandeep Gupta, David White, James Jordan , Daniel Simon, and Paul Anderson. (READ THE LANDMARK RESEARCH HERE)

The CDC is now legally requiring red-blooded Americans to wear face masks on all public transportation as globalists try to push the concept of “double-masking” on the populace. Since the election, the World Health Organization admits that PCR tests are not totally reliable on the first try and a second test might be needed.

This corresponds with CDC’s quiet admission that it blended viral and antibody test results for its case numbers and that people can test positive on an antibody test if they have antibodies from a family of viruses that cause the common cold.

Hospitals in Florida had so many accuracy complications that Orlando Health had to admit that its 9.4 percent positivity rate got recorded at 98 percent. (READ: The TRUTH About Fauci and Gates And NIH Owning A Stake in the Vaccine).

The watchdog group, All Concerned Citizens, quoted from a statement provided to NATIONAL FILE, referring to the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge study, which said:

“The groundbreaking peer-reviewed research…asserts that the CDC willfully violated multiple federal laws including the Information Quality Act, Paperwork Reduction Act, and Administrative Procedures Act at minimum. (Publishing Journal – Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge / Public Health Policy Initiative) Most notably, the CDC illegally enacted new rules for data collection and reporting exclusively for COVID-19 that resulted in a 1,600% inflation of current COVID-19 fatality totals.”

“The research demonstrates that the CDC failed to apply for mandatory federal oversight and failed to open a mandatory period for public scientific comment in both instances as is required by federal law before enacting new rules for data collection and reporting. The CDC is required to be in full compliance with all federal laws even during emergency situations. The research asserts that CDC willfully compromised the accuracy and integrity of all COVID-19 case and fatality data from the onset of this crisis in order to fraudulently inflate case and fatality data,”

It added:

“On March 24th the CDC published the NVSS COVID-19 Alert No. 2 document instructing medical examiners, coroners and physicians to deemphasize underlying causes of death, also referred to as pre-existing conditions or comorbidities, by recording them in Part II rather than Part I of death certificates as “…the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID-19 being the underlying cause of death more often than not.”

This was a major rule change for death certificate reporting from the CDC’s 2003 Coroners’ Handbook on Death Registration and Fetal Death Reporting and Physicians’ Handbook on Medical Certification of Death, which have instructed death reporting professionals nationwide to report underlying conditions in Part I for the previous 17 years.

This single change resulted in a significant inflation of COVID-19 fatalities by instructing that COVID-19 be listed in Part I of death certificates as a definitive cause of death regardless of confirmatory evidence, rather than listed in Part II as a contributor to death in the presence of pre-existing conditions, as would have been done using the 2003 guidelines.

The research draws attention to this key distinction as it has led to a significant inflation in COVID fatality totals. By the researcher’s estimates, COVID-19 recorded fatalities are inflated nationwide by as much as 1600% above what they would be had the CDC used the 2003 handbooks,” stated All Concerned Citizens.

“Then on April 14th, the CDC adopted additional rules exclusive for COVID-19 in violation of federal law by outsourcing data collection rule development to the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE), a non-profit entity, again without applying for oversight and opening opportunity for public scientific review.

On April 5th the CSTE published a position paper Standardized surveillance case definition and national notification for 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) listing 5 CDC employees as subject matter experts. This key document created new rules for counting probable cases as actual cases without definitive proof of infection (section VII.A1 – pages 4 & 5), new rules for contact tracing allowing contact tracers to practice medicine without a license (section VII.A3 – page 5), and yet refused to define new rules for ensuring that the same person could not be counted multiple times as a new case (section VII.B – page 7),” stated All Concerned Citizens.

“By enacting these new rules exclusively for COVID-19 in violation of federal law, the research alleges that the CDC significantly inflated data that has been used by elected officials and public health officials, in conjunction with unproven projection models from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), to justify extended closures for schools, places of worship, entertainment, and small businesses leading to unprecedented emotional and economic hardships nationwide. A formal petition has been sent to the Department of Justice as well as all US Attorneys seeking an immediate grand jury investigation into these allegations,” All Concerned Citizens stated.

So…do you still trust the globalist oligarchs?

More at nationalfile.com

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.

Trackback from your site.

Comments (2)

  • Avatar

    Charles Higley

    |

    “Since the election, the World Health Organization admits that PCR tests are not totally reliable on the first try and a second test might be needed.”

    Wait, if the first test might be wrong, so might be the second test. This is stupid. The test is so bad, over 95% bad, that you would need 100 tests to be sure. Wow.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Crabon bigfoot

    |

    https://cf5e727d-d02d-4d71-89ff-9fe2d3ad957f.filesusr.com/ugd/adf864_c39029cd980642e48797cdb2ef965972.pdf
    COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal
    Law: A Historical Retrospective
    Henry Ealy , y, Michael McEvoy zx, Daniel Chong , John Nowicki , Monica Sava {, Sandeep Gupta
    k, David White , James Jordan , Daniel Simon yy, Paul Anderson zz
    Abstract
    According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on August 23, 2020,
    “For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions
    or causes in addition to COVID-19 , on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or
    causes per death.”[1] For a nation tormented by restrictive public health policies mandated for
    healthy individuals and small businesses, this is the most important statistical revelation of
    this crisis. This revelation significantly impacts the published fatalities count due to COVID-19.
    More importantly, it exposes major problems with the process by which the CDC was able
    to generate inaccurate data during a crisis. The CDC has advocated for social isolation,
    social distancing, and personal protective equipment use as primary mitigation strategies in
    response to the COVID-19 crisis, while simultaneously refusing to acknowledge the promise
    of inexpensive pharmaceutical and natural treatments. These mitigation strategies were
    promoted largely in response to projection model fatality forecasts that have proven to be
    substantially inaccurate. Further investigation into the legality of the methods used to create
    these strategies raised additional concerns and questions. Why would the CDC decide
    against using a system of data collection & reporting they authored, and which has been
    in use nationwide for 17 years without incident, in favor of an untested & unproven system
    exclusively for COVID-19 without discussion and peer-review? Did the CDC’s decision to
    abandon a known and proven effective system also breach several federal laws that ensure
    data accuracy and integrity? Did the CDC knowingly alter rules for reporting cause of death in
    the presence of comorbidity exclusively for COVID-19? If so, why?
    continued on next page
    Keywords
    COVID-19 , SARS-COV-2 , comorbidity, fatality, impact, regulation
    Energetic Health Institute
    yContact [email protected]
    zMetabolic Healing Institute
    xTrueReport Nutrigenomics Research Institute
    {University of Maryland
    kAustralian College of Nutritional & Environmental
    Medicine, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners.
    Lotus Institute of Holistic Health
    Climate Change Truth
    yyBeacon of Hope
    zzAnderson Medical Group
    1

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via