British industry paying highest electricity prices in the world

British companies are paying the highest electricity prices of anywhere in the developed world, official data has shown

The cost of power for industrial businesses has jumped 124 percent in just five years, according to the Government’s figures, catapulting the UK to the top of international league tables.

It is now about 50 percent more expensive than in Germany and France, and four times as expensive as in the US.

The figures will fuel concerns about the future of UK industry amid warnings that high energy prices are crippling domestic manufacturers.

They underline the challenge facing Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, who wants industrial businesses to switch away from gas to electricity-powered processes.

Frank Aaskov, the director of energy at lobby group UK Steel, said:

“High industrial electricity prices have for too long damaged the competitiveness of UK steelmaking, and many in the wider manufacturing sector will be feeling the same pressure our steel companies do.

The Government should tackle steep electricity costs and make the UK a fruitful place to invest, while enabling growth and improving competitiveness.”

The electricity price paid by UK industrial users per kilowatt hour rose to 25.85 pence in 2023, the data shows. That compares to 10.43 pence as recently as five years earlier and 8.89 pence a decade ago.

It also far outstripped European rivals and allies such as the US and Canada. The equivalent price was 17.84 pence in France, 17.71 pence in Germany and 6.48 pence in the US.

Across all the 31 member countries of the International Energy Agency, which collates the data, the median price was 17.70 pence per kilowatt hour, with Britain’s price higher than any other country.

It comes after paper and packaging giant DS Smith told The Telegraph that high power prices risked becoming a barrier to investment, while steel producers – including Tata, the owner of Port Talbot – have warned ministers they “must deliver” more competitive prices.

Yet many manufacturers are being encouraged to ditch industrial processes that use ‘fossil fuels’ such as natural gas and switch over to electricity, as part of efforts to reach ‘net zero’ ‘carbon’ emissions.

For example, Tata is in the process of closing its last blast furnace and transitioning to an electric arc furnace.

Despite this, a report by UK Steel this month described the electricity price as “a barrier to growth, competitiveness and profitability”.

Successive governments have attempted to bring down Britain’s power costs, with the Conservatives most recently introducing the “supercharger” discount for energy-intensive businesses such as steel producers and glass makers.

The supercharger strips out the majority of network costs and ‘green’ levies. However, even after this huge discount UK Steel said power remained roughly twice as expensive as in Germany.

It blamed the disparity on the UK’s electricity generation mix being “more dependent on gas”, with high natural gas prices pushing up UK power prices.

The UK generated 33.7 percent of its power using gas in 2023, compared to 17.1 percent in Germany and just 5.9 percent in nuclear-dominated France.

In the UK, wind was in second, generating 28.7 percent. But the wholesale price of electricity is set by the most expensive method needed to meet demand.

Because ‘renewables’ such as wind and solar currently do not meet this demand on their own, it almost always tracks the price of gas.

For example, on late last Thursday afternoon (the day the source article was written – Ed), gas was still being burned to generate 20 percent of Britain’s power, while 35.6 percent and 10.7 percent were generated by wind and solar respectively.

(Notice the use of the word ‘still’, as if this is a bad thing – Ed)

Against this backdrop, the Government has previously considered trying to decouple gas from the electricity price so that companies could instead pay a lower rate linked to ‘renewables’.

(This maintains the fiction that ‘renewables’ are cheaper than so-called ‘fossil fuels’ – Ed)

But in a consultation published in March on reforms to the electricity market, the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said it had dropped the proposal.

It said this was “on the basis that they would not deliver benefits for consumers and fail in our assessment against our criteria of deliverability and investor confidence”.

A Government spokesman said:

“We are already bringing energy costs for UK industries closer in line with other major economies through the British Industry Supercharger.

This fully exempts eligible firms from certain costs linked to renewable energy policies, particularly those exposed to the high cost of electricity.

Our mission is for clean power by 2030 because clean, homegrown energy is the best way to protect billpayers and boost Britain’s energy independence, with improving infrastructure at the heart of this mission.”

See more here yahoo.com

Header image: The Conversation

Editor’s note: that government spokesman is living in cloud cuckoo land if he actually believes that guff. This ‘mission’ for 2030 will do exactly the opposite of what he claims. It will push electricity prices ever higher and reduce, not increase, the UK’s energy security.

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (1)

  • Avatar

    Howdy

    |

    From the Telegraph link.

    “Welsh-made steel from Port Talbot could be used to build giant floating offshore wind turbines as part of a £500m government support package being finalised with ministers.”
    Will the installation be for Tata’s use only?

    “The Government has made clear that some of the money for such an investment could potentially be provided by taxpayers through a £2.5bn green steel fund.”
    The Labour taxes are insidious. The end result being power prices will increase further to compensate.

    On Tuesday, the Department for Business and Trade said:
    “Decarbonisation does not mean deindustrialisation”
    Living in a dream world, and it’s allready well advanced.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via