Britain’s Mass Blackout Drives Push For Nuclear Power
It’s amazing how quickly millions of minds left freezing or boiling in the dark focus on the importance of having power as and when it’s needed.
Wind and solar obsessed South Australians set the benchmark for blackouts and mass load shedding.
Now the UK and had its first taste of the kind of grid chaos inevitably delivered when you pin your hopes on the weather. The idea that a modern economy can power itself on sunshine and breezes is nonsense. Not so with ever-reliable nuclear power.
There are around 450 nuclear reactors operating in 30 countries around the world, 15 countries are currently building another 60 reactors and their combined output accounts for over 11% of global electricity production – compared with total global output from wind which, to the nearest decimal point, is zero. And all without so much as a hiccup.
Having worked out that wind power will never work, British MPs are pointing to a power generation solution which has always worked, and which always will – 24/7, whatever the weather.
Tories plan mini-nuclear reactors for the North in major change to energy policy
Mirror
Ben Glaze
12 August 2019
A series of mini-nuclear reactors could be built across the North in a major power scheme.
Plants could generate energy in Yorkshire, Cumbria, Lancashire and Cheshire under a project spearheaded by Rolls-Royce for “small modular reactors”.
The Government is pumping in £18million so the firm can develop the design of the reactors.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson is expected to formally announce the plan in September and the first plant could be up and running within the next 15 years.
“These new mini nuclear reactors would be concentrated across the North — and plans are in motion to place them in the Sheffield city region, Cumbria, Lancashire and Cheshire,” a Government source told the Times.
“Nuclear is clean and a way of reducing the UK’s carbon footprint on a large scale.”
The reactors would trigger a jobs bonanza, with 40,000 posts expected to be created.
Each power station could generate enough energy to fuel 750,000 homes, according to estimates by the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
Northern Powerhouse Partnership director Henri Murison said: “There is market ready technology available globally which can be put together with the UK supply chain, with us having what is needed to build them here in the Northern Powerhouse alongside investing in a large factory which this support will help us to achieve.
“Work undertaken by the Nuclear Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre has shown what can be achieved; ensuring that we build up our capabilities and all the resulting economic benefits of the jobs being here in making them.
“Our upcoming energy industrial strategy for the Northern Powerhouse will focus heavily on SMRs, fulfilling the promise of when George Osborne back in 2015 committed the funds to establish the UK as a leader in what was then an emerging area globally.”
Supporters say nuclear power is clean, efficient and renewable.
But critics believe it is too expensive, takes too long to clean up and the risks involved are too great.
Rolls-Royce’s website says: “At every point in the development of our UK SMR solution, we have sought to take a modular approach to drive down the cost of electricity to as low as practically possible, whilst at the same time building in multiple layers of fault prevention and protection to make sure the technology is safe in all modes of operation.”
Sheffield City Region mayor Dan Jarvis said: “The Sheffield City Region is superbly placed to support the development of small modular reactors technology.
“We can play a leading role in meeting the challenges of climate change while helping to keep the lights on.”
French firm EDF is building a £20billion nuke plant at Hinkley Point in Somerset.
The Treasury struck a deal with the company that means the UK will pay £92.50 per megawatt-hour, roughly twice the current market rate.
EDF wants to build another station at Sizewell in Suffolk, which could cost £16billion.
The need for new power sources in Britain has provoked huge rows over the direction of policy in the UK.
Environmental campaigners want a greater focus on renewables such as solar, wind and tidal.
Last Friday, nearly a million people were hit by a major power cut across large areas of England and Wales, affecting homes and transport networks during the evening rush hour.
The National Grid blamed problems with two power generators as blackouts were reported across the Midlands, the South East, South West and North East of England, and Wales.
Industry experts said a gas-fired power station at Little Barford, Beds, failed first followed two minutes later by the Hornsea offshore wind farm disconnecting from the grid.
Mirror
Trackback from your site.
Andy Rowlands
| #
I hope this comes off, I’ve been an advocate for nuclear power for a long time, it’s the safest industry in the world.
Reply
Wally
| #
Q: So, what did you use before candles?
A: Electricity
Reply
Chris Marcil
| #
Nuke power is not clean. And has the capacity to be very bad for a very long time. The more of these plants built the greater the chances of another catastrophe. There are already modular plants, they run off of coal or gas. Nuke requires its output to be contained for very long periods of time, very expensive. Not so with traditional sources. One day a different source will be needed but we need new tech to figure out what will work. The weather dependent sources are terrible, but I don’t think that nuke would be the way to go either.
Reply
Matt
| #
“The Treasury struck a deal with the company that means the UK will pay £92.50 per megawatt-hour, roughly twice the current market rate.”
REALLY!!!
It would be interesting to see the cost per megawatt-hour for coal, natural gas, geothermal, hydro, and existing nuclear generators, etc.
How is research into fusion coming along? Fusion research could be a good recipient of climate alarmism taxes.
Reply
David
| #
Clean Nuclear energy has been possible since the 1950 but the establishment wanted unrainium and plutoniun for bombs. Thorium reactors non poluting can built off site and transported and then 25 years later changed for a new one AND cant go critical because it requires and energy beam to cause the reactions plus nuclear waste can be burnt and safely disposed of in a Thorium reactor and thats NOT the best bit Thorium is one of the must common elements on earth it lays on the surface and it doesnt need expensive purification! If you want cheaps SAFE claen Energy then Thorium!
Reply