Breaking: UK Govt’s OWN NUMBERS Expose Their COVID19 Fraud!
The mainstream media claims more than 50,000 Brits have died ‘with‘ COVID19. But official government data proves only 13,844 people were actually infected by the disease in the whole of 2020.
The official hard evidence provided below is inescapable. Ministers had this data all along and lied. It proves the political class are knowingly wrecking the UK economy as well as the livelihoods and health of 65 million citizens.
We are grateful to Patricia P Tursi, Ph.D. Springfield, MO for bringing to our attention these crucial official numbers which have been collected each week of 2020 by Public Health England (PHE).
It shows beyond any reasonable doubt that the pandemic narrative peddled for the last nine months by politicians (in cahoots with the mainstream media) is gross misrepresentation and exaggeration.
We are told by various Government puppets and the MSM propaganda machine of the scary totals every day. This information is on the UK Government website right in plain sight. See here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/notifiable-diseases-weekly-reports-for-2020Notifiable diseases: weekly reports for 2020
Analysis of data for statutory notifications of infectious diseases (NOIDS) in England and Wales in 2020.This will shock you.Click the link above, then open each weekly report to see the Covid weekly infections, not cases, not deaths. It is the law that these statistics must be given to Public Health England.This is the statement on the site: Registered Medical Practitioner in England and Wales have a statutory duty to notify a Proper Officer of the local authority, often the CCDC (Consultant in Communicable Disease Control), of suspected cases of certain infectious diseases.The first Infection was reported in week 10, so we have now had 41 weeks.In black and white these are the true facts.The total number of people that have had a Covid infection in England and Wales is……
13,844.
Now living in Lincolnshire I checked out how many have been infected, the total is 47, I live in an area called South Holland, infections for the area in 41 weeks? FIVE.Now we are being told Peterborough is the epicenter of infections, well Peterborough has had a total of 4 in 41 weeks, in fact, that is the whole of Cambridgeshire, just FOUR.Norfolk and Suffolk have been put in tier 4, but there have had a grand total of ZERO infections between them.Let’s move on to Wales
In 41 weeks a total of ZERO Infections have been reported. I found this strange considering the dictatorship like restrictions they have. So I visited NHS Wales, thinking they must be on their website,NO, nothing.First Minister of Wales Drakeford (photo, right) has taken the Welsh business community to the edge of destruction, over obfuscated figures, driving insane policy decisions masquerading as law, whilst passing on the cost to businesses.We are being lied to, it’s there is Black and White. Check it out for yourselves, find the town city or county you live in and see how many you can find.Decide for yourselves which course of action to take.
—
“In the course of our evidence gathering activities, we have gone through a few thousand papers reporting studies on all aspects of Covid-19 spread. We found that not very many defined a case of Covid, which is a sign of sloppiness when that is what you are looking for. Those that did, reported different definitions and ways of ascertaining what they meant by a ‘case’.”
Some of the above information was provided with the assistance of Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd, CERT Public Health of the Natural and Common Law Tribunal for Public Health and Justice. More information about the important public service they provide is found at: www.peaceinspace.org and exopolitics.blogs.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
Mark Tapley
| #
How can anyone be infected by a supposed pathogen that has not even ben isolated or identified. Much less pass the standard for all pathogens, the Koch’s Postulate. This site has already brought out the fact that what is typically diagnosed as the flu is upon lab testing accurate only 16% of the time. Another factor is that ap. a third of ailments are psychogenic and have no physical cause.
Reply
Jayson Groovara
| #
Awsum – but can somebody do a you tube walk thru on how to find the exact figures on the gov website? Its very tricky to find them. Think of this as a court case. Present your evidence to the jury, step by step.
Reply
Alex cumbers
| #
Daily UK dashboard:
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk
Excess deaths (updated every two weeks):
https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/static-reports/mortality-surveillance/excess-mortality-in-england-latest.html
Reply
Marion
| #
You’ll have to click on each week separately to open them. Covid cases are listed at the end of the Table 2 lists. Very low figures each week.
Reply
Marion
| #
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/notifiable-diseases-weekly-reports-for-2020 It also opens up if you click on my name but obviously no one would know that so I’ve posted it again! 😃
Reply
Jim Kernicky
| #
I’ll add the links below but I tried searching for the CDC’s sitemap so I could get a list of all of their covid-19 articles – their linked Sitemap is a joke. Then I tacked on robots.txt to the end of their domain and that is where I found a link to their autogenerated sitemap.xml file. I estimate that the CDC has 1500 articles on the topic. I bet the doom-and-gloom themed articles are easy to find on their site – and the articles with actual numbers are buried deep and hard to find. Here is a link to the CDC’s robots.txt page and sitemap.xml – they this for your government’s corresponding agency’s site:
CDC robots.txt: https://www.cdc.gov/robots.txt
CDC sitemap.xml: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/sitemap.xml
Reply
Alex cumbers
| #
Get the facts: https://fullfact.org/health/Covid-isolated-virus/
Reply
PPerrin
| #
Alex, that full facts link has no references – it just makes a unsupported claim that there other people have claimed to have isolated the virus. They might just well writen ‘oh yes it has’ and left it at that… clearly you are very easily persuaded.
Try this instead https://youtu.be/LrpKBehJRls
Reply
Alex cumbers
| #
Try reading the fullfact again – plenty of references are there.
Here’s another one: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045880/
Reply
Clare Rainbird
| #
But it has been isolated
Reply
Frances Leader
| #
https://hive.blog/worldnews/@francesleader/vaccines-for-a-virus-which-has-never-been-isolated-this-is-not-science
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
Mark, You are absolutely correct. Exposing the scientific failure to isolate and verify the actual existence of the virus is peeling back another layer of this enormous rotten onion of medical fraud.
Reply
Marilyn Shepherd
| #
I haven’t seen such a massive fraud before
Reply
Blane
| #
Swine Flu. Bird Flu.
Reply
John
| #
The virus has been isolated stop repeating bullshit youve seen on latest conspiracy video you cretins.
Reply
taxedserf
| #
Who isolated the virus, and when did they do so?
Who holds stockpiles of the serum in which the isolated virus and/or pathogen is stored, for the purposes of further examination and/or developing vaccines?
If the virus and/or its pathogen are indeed isolated, why do Freedom of Information Requests worldwide return “data not found” replies?
Reply
Alex cumbers
| #
https://fullfact.org/health/Covid-isolated-virus/
Heather Wilson
| #
If the virus has been isolated and the government are so concerned about conspiracy theorists spreading so called conspiracies, why would they not immediately debunk them, and puplicly say that the virus had been isolated, and provide the evidence accordingly?
Reply
Clare Rainbird
| #
Absolutely in china and Canada
Reply
Alex cumbers
| #
How PCR test identifies the virus:
Reply
taxedserf
| #
This YouTube video does not explain how PCR identifies the virus, it explains how a PCR is supposed to work, including disclosure of the primer required to tell the test what to detect.
In other words, it’s a tautology.
You’d need an isolated and proven sample of sars-cov-2 to make the primer, and/or prove the genome that is allegedly that of sars-cov-2.
To suggest that the video identifies the virus is therefore misinformation.
Reply
Alex cumbers
| #
Are you suggesting that the test does not identify the unique biomarkers of the virus & testing does not work? If so, you should present your evidence & also discuss with Dr Wilson.
Reply
Finn McCool
| #
Which test? Which Manufacturer? How many ‘biomarkers’? How many Ct cycles? What’s the prevalence in the population?
The UK gov has spent £22 billion on ‘testing’ the healthy.
65 million people have been imprisoned because of social policies forced on them based on the result of a spurious test. Lives, careers, businesses have been ruined because of it.
The zombie apocalypse didn’t happen.
Get over it.
Alex cumbers
| #
https://fullfact.org/health/Covid-isolated-virus/
Jo S
| #
Hello Alex, please provide one published article that shows how PCR tests are testing for SARS COV2. The Corman Drosten paper that solidified the WHO PCR protocol is deeply flawed even to those with basic scientific knowledge.
Paul Russell
| #
Fullfact is funded by the bill and Melinda Gates foundation. Anyone with half a brain can see this article is not only biased in favour of the narrative, but fails to explain the fraudulent increase of cycles which leads to false positives.
Reply
Akex
| #
Check it out: https://fullfact.org/about/funding/
Reply
Paul Russell
| #
This dolt in the YouTube video tries to discredit the PCR inventor but mullis has said the PCR cannot differentiate between a previous infection or currently infectious. Also the cycle threshold is being increased to induce false positives. The fuzzy haired beaker fails to mention this. Unfortunately these “scientism” morons think they know science. Pathetic
Reply
judy Ryan
| #
I hav e found the weekly report 10, but I cannot find ‘covid’ of flue.I also can’t find the 13,844 number. I would really like to use this info in a public letter. Can you please send me more specific instructions.
Reply
Mark Huxley
| #
Go to the end of each weekly summary from week 11 onwards. The totals for Covid-19 are presented in Table 2 for each week. Also, on the government website for this information there is a section on related content on the right-hand side – this presents you with an Excel spreadsheet for totals for the last 52 weeks.
Reply
judy Ryan
| #
Covid only appears twice in the whole document and its not in table 2 on my computer
Reply
judy Ryan
| #
here for example is week 16. Can you find iton your computer?
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/880949/NOIDS-weekly-report-week16-2020.pdf
Reply
Alan
| #
Judy, Covid-19 starts on page 14 of the document.
Reply
Robert
| #
Covid-19 deaths started on week 10.
Linden
| #
The government are SO sneaky with this data. On the link Covid is not shown. On PHE’s excel spreadsheet, Covid is the only illness that is hidden – you have to find a tick box (the ONLY one unticked) and tick it before those figures are shown. One must wonder why they are trying to hide these figures so much!
Reply
judy Ryan
| #
i’ve emailed asking them to send the tables in excel format.
Reply
sovereigntea
| #
You need to download the annual figures spreadsheet from here.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/notifiable-diseases-last-52-weeks
When you open the spreadsheet you will see columns for all notifiable disease except Covid. That is because some toad of a civil servant has deliberately tweaked the spreadsheet so that although there the data is not displayed.
In order to circumvent this you need to open the dialog box entitled DS_DISEASE_TEXT. Open this via the little arrow and a list of diseases with ticks by them are the ones displayed. Scroll down to Covid and tick the box ( curiously the only one without a tick fancy that ). Move somewhere else in the sheet and the covid data will appear.
Clearly this effort in obfuscation is contrary to the 7 principles of public office and should be a disciplinary offence.
Reply
sovereigntea
| #
Apologies .. forgot to say that you need to first select the tab at the bottom “Statutory notifiable diseases A to K – number of cases reported for the last 52 weeks” to begin with.
Rebecca
| #
Thank you, I have been wondering how to find the total.
Evie B
| #
Go to page 14 in each weekly report. Numbers of deaths are listed under Covid-19. There are no where near the numbers MSM are pushing out. It’s total propaganda which is why they are focusing on upping the “cases” to support thier sickening agenda.
Reply
Evie B
| #
Update to my last – just realised this is the “case” numbers, not deaths! So how on Earth can they exaggerate these figures to the extent they are doing knowing they do not match what they are publishing on thier own Government website? What is going on with thier data????
Reply
Jane
| #
Covid records start at week 10. Scroll to page 14. Total recorded cases for week and then breakdown of areas.
Reply
judy Ryan
| #
However, my research shows that zero percent of the UK population have died from Covid19.
I used these three sites
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/uk/
https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by-country/
https://www.hackmath.net/en/calculator/percentage
Reply
Carrie Spence
| #
Why does the worldometer day the no one in the UK has recovered?
Reply
sovereigntea
| #
For Z score morbidity totals in Europe see data here. Scroll down for UK graphs.
Note the sliders can be used to adjust timescales.
I’ll wager you can’t spot a deadly pandemic.
Putting it crudely no bodies = no pandemic
https://www.euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps/
Reply
Alex cumbers
| #
Check:
Excess deaths (updated every two weeks):
https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/static-reports/mortality-surveillance/excess-mortality-in-england-latest.html
Reply
taxedserf
| #
The site https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/static-reports/mortality-surveillance/excess-mortality-in-england-latest.html is clearly labelled “experimental”.
Presumably, the hypothesis behind this experiment is “How many suckers fall for this?”
To see a more honest presentation of data – all excess mortality over a rolling average – see https://www.euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps . In the “first wave”, the excess deaths rose in week 12 in 2020 (that’s the third week in March 2020). By amazing co-incidence, this was when the UK started lockdown. Wow. Wasn’t it also when the Secretary of State ordered the NHS to expel all elderly patients into care homes, irrespective of the patients’ treatment plans? And where the care home had the capacity to continue to treatment plan?
In Feb2020, we were told by orthodox news services and government departments that covid19 had an incubation period of 14 days, then 21 days, then 28 days, then 30 days. It took a while for the propagandists to learn their script correctly.
But covid19 would have landed in the UK at roughly the same time as it did in Italy, because the transit routes to/from China were still open. And we can deduce that if indeed covid19 was endemic in China by 30Dec2019 – to the extent that the Chinese Communist Party saw fit to tell the world – then covid19 must have been doing the rounds in China for at least three months earlier. Maths just doesn’t work any other way.
So if covid19 was the causative agent for excess mortality, we’d have seen excess deaths in the UK before Jan2020, long before UK lockdown. But we didn’t.
So presumably, covid19 was off skiing in Jan2020 & Feb2020? Having a winter vacation, perhaps?
Finally, on 25Mar2020, the UK Parliament passed the Coronavirus Act 2020, which made it virtually impossible to hold an inquest into any death where covid19 was remotely suspected So the primary means we would have had to detect and isolate this disease and/or its pathogen was wilfully sabotaged. It’s possibly the only time in the modern era where we deliberately sought ignorance to fight a deadly disease.
Reply
Alex cumbers
| #
Science, not propagandists, takes time to figure out details, especially in the early period in Q1 and we still don’t know many things about it now. I’m sure the experimental statistics are not far off production status, they are unlikely to be massively wrong. We can certainly agree this government’s handling has been terrible, if we’d followed ASIA and worn masks early on, we may have done much better.
Reply
Mr B J Man
| #
Why do people use the five year averages?
Because it hides the bad years of the previous four years.
And ALL the data of ALL the years before that!
But ignoring Spanish Flu, Hong Kong Flu, Asian Flu (both of which had vaccines available), and all the other bad flu years from before your linked Euromomo graph and just looking at that:
https://twitter.com/bogusNewsViews/status/1345883215404396544?s=20
Reply
Simon
| #
There was 22 deaths due to covid in one care home near me.
Reply
Mr B J Man
| #
On average a fifth of residential home residents will die every year.
A third of nursing home patients will die every year on average.
If you test every death and run the PCR virus manufacturing process for enough cycles EVERY one of them will have died “from” (with) COVID1984!
Reply
Toni Moseley
| #
5 in Birmingham 31
Reply
judy Ryan
| #
For Australia the figures are. 909 deaths out of a population of 25,499,884 is also 0.003 %
Reply
judy Ryan
| #
To put it in proportion 25% of Australian die from cardiovascular disease.
Reply
judy Ryan
| #
For Australia the figures are. 909 deaths out of a population of 25,499,884 is also 0.003 %
BY COMPARISON ONE OUT OF EVERY Four PEOPLE DIE OF CARDIO VASCULAR disease in Australia. If the government gave a damn about its people it would mandate exercise instead of a vaccine.
Reply
Frances
| #
Judy Ryan. PM Morrison in Australia, the federal health officer, the various state health officers are all reading from the script provided by the WHO, same as Trudeau in Canada, Boris in UK, Macron in France and surprisingly Angela M. in Germany. I just wonder what incentives they are given to tow the line.
Reply
Terri Jackson
| #
The situation is even worse. The “infections” depend on the cycles used by the labs, the CT values. As Dr Fauchi correctly says any test result above 35 cycles means no infection ! UK and US PCR tests are run at higher values around 40ct or higher. That means ALL results based on the corrupt PCR test are not infections. Almost all positives are false positives, that means such persons do not have Covid-19 and are not infectious and will infect no-one! However the even bigger question is does Covid-19 actually exist at all? I I will comment on that question shortly
Reply
richard
| #
Which one relates to covid?
Reply
richard
| #
Sorry, page 14!!
Reply
tom0mason
| #
Also of note is ‘Guidance for doctors completing medical certificates of cause of death in England and Wales’ ( https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/877302/guidance-for-doctors-completing-medical-certificates-of-cause-of-death-covid-19.pdf ) , where COVID-19 is singled out many times for special treatment, as a notifiable diagnosis of death.
Reply
Robert
| #
Great article John. This has totally exposed the government lies. The proof is there to see on the Public Health England website.
Why is Matt Hancock and Boris Johnson not being held accountable for their blatant lies and destruction of the UK? This evidence should be spread far and wide.
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
Thanks, Robert. All we can do is keep sharing this data far and wide and confront the propagandists in government and the media to fess up to the truth it’s all a scam.
Reply
cathleen anderson
| #
Here is the Proof by Vernon Coleman
“As I reported on my website back in March, on March 19th, the public health bodies in the UK and the Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens decided that the new disease should no longer be classified as a ‘high consequence infectious disease’ (click on the link below to see the proof). The coronavirus was downgraded to flu level.
A couple of days after this decision, the UK Government introduced lockdowns and introduced the most oppressive Bill in British Parliamentary history. The Emergency Bill, which was 358 pages long, turned Britain into a totalitarian state and gave the Government and the police unprecedented powers. Public meetings and elections were banned and there were new powers relating to ‘restrictions on use and disclosure of information’.
There are still people who do not know that the coronavirus was downgraded to `flu’ threat back in March. Please send the link to MPs and newspapers. It proves that everything that has happened since March has been a lie.”
High Consequence Infectious Disease.gov.uk
Reply
s roy
| #
When sharing data when you download it you need to unhide the column for covid. TGhey have hidden it on the spreadsheet. For the full year the actual data is 18152.
Reply
Carrie Spence
| #
Why does the worldometer say that no one in the UK has recovered?
Reply
Lorraine
| #
Worldometer doesn’t say that no-one in the UK has recovered. It says n/a for the number recovered which means that for some reason the current figures are not available.
Reply
Tony
| #
Hi there love the work you are doing it must take many hours of hard work researching, Thank you
I looked up your registered address And there is many Other companies registered there Also ? , I’m sure there is a legitimate reason for this .
I would like to know why you use such an address ? Before I donate
Many Thanks
Tony
Reply
Mr B J Man
| #
Most small companies are like that.
They provide all the legal requirements for setting up a company and the registered address.
Reply
Carol
| #
Just Googling PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL brought up this interesting info. Even the claimed registered address in not correct. I’d be very wary of making any donations…
https://www.desmogblog.com/principia-scientific-international
Reply
Louise
| #
Hi Carol, may I suggest not using google as it is highly censored and anything going against the official narrative will be censored. Duck duck go is far better and will give uncensored results.
Reply
richard
| #
https://principia-scientific.com/desmogblog-criminal-enemies-of-science/
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
Carol, Your source, Desmogblog has long been discredited for being run by a serial liar and convicted criminal. See here: https://principia-scientific.com/desmogblog-criminal-enemies-of-science/
Reply
Andy Rowlands
| #
I write for PSI and I knw the editor quite well. If I thought there was anything untoward I would steer clear. DeSmog is a well-known alarmist publication that attempts to smear anything and anyone who disagrees with them. PSI is trustworthy. DeSmog is not.
Reply
tom0mason
| #
This little video from Dr. Eric Berg in October ask the question about how effective are these lockdowns —
Reply
Advocatus Diaboli
| #
Looking at the Worldometers page for the UK (https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/uk/), in the table “Total Coronavirus Deaths in the United Kingdom,” there were 73,512 “coronavirus deaths” in that country through December 31. However, looking at the Excel spreadsheet for “Notifiable diseases: last 52 weeks” (available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/notifiable-diseases-last-52-weeks), in England and Wales there was a “Grand Total” of 18,152 “cases reported” of COVID-19 for England and Wales in the 52 weeks of 2020.
This would make it seem that there were four times as many “coronavirus deaths” in the UK as people who had the disease. Has anybody from the UK government, health officials, “experts,” or media explained this apparent discrepancy?
Reply
Paul
| #
Hi
Can someone please direct me to a link establishing that there have been no excess deaths ..I keep hearing this but where are tge figures to support it?
Thanks
Paul
Reply
Alex cumbers
| #
https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/static-reports/mortality-surveillance/excess-mortality-in-england-latest.html
Reply
Finn McCool
| #
Hi Alex,
Thanks for that link.
What I like about this report is that it makes a better estimate of ‘normal’ mortality rates than a simple 5 year mean. Of course, there is not a great deal of difference in the overall numbers.
One problem it doesn’t address is excess deaths as a direct result of ‘lockdowns’ or indeed misdiagnosis of death due to a PCR test. One thing I am seeing in Scottish data is that deaths under 75 are following the simple 5 year mean. Once again, it is the over 75 age group which is suffering.
There undoubtedly was a viral epidemic in the Spring. It was exacerbated by the number of care home deaths caused by moving the old and infirm from hospitals to care homes. Care home deaths are on the rise again. It is a national disgrace that £22 billion has been spent on a useless testing regime whilst the vulnerable have been ignored.
The epidemic burnt out in late May.
Reply
Gemma
| #
Excuse my ignorance, but are those documents just PHE data? i.e the rest is provided separately by NHS so that’s where the rest of the figures are.
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
Gemma, The data is all NHS data for England and Wales, excluding data from Scotland and Northern Ireland, which are proportionately smaller.
Reply
Gemma
| #
Thank you
Reply
Gemma
| #
Thank you.
Reply
Alex cumbers
| #
Detailed breakdown of excess deaths (updated every two weeks) showing 67K deaths:
https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/static-reports/mortality-surveillance/excess-mortality-in-england-latest.html
Daily UK dashboard:
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk
How PCR test identifies the virus:
How Covid spreads through the air:
https://english.elpais.com/society/2020-10-28/a-room-a-bar-and-a-class-how-the-coronavirus-is-spread-through-the-air.html
Debunk & determine bad information:
https://www.theguardian.com/science/grrlscientist/2012/mar/22/1
Reply
Al
| #
Hi Alex,
These people will only believe what confirms their own selfish world view or the simplified and easy to understand false narrative that they have been fed by right wing con artists.
It’s a valiant effort but you are wasting your time.
Reply
Tom
| #
I am looking at the columns on the notifiable diseases and I can’t see Covid19 column at all. When I click on the columns I am unable to unhide anything. Nothings seams to be hidden. I can only see week 52.
Reply
Mr B J Man
| #
Most small companies are like that.
They provide all the legal requirements for setting up a company and the registered address.
Reply
Shuruckai
| #
I was planning on using the Notifiable Deseases report as evidence however since reading this report from 2010, https://www.bmj.com/content/340/sbmj.c507
I actually see how easy it is to dispute it. If back in 2010 doctors were failing to report Deseases due to ignorance that were Notifiable then reporting Covid, a new desease belonging to the flu family and therefore not Notifiable could be even less well known as a desease to notify the authorities about, especially as there must be a duplication of effort somewhere?
If someone can confirm that 100% of Covid infections are being notified without error or failure on the doctor’s part then with evidence I’ll be happy to continue using this line of logic.
Reply
Tasha
| #
Fact check my arse 🤣🖕
Reply
Bill
| #
Although I’m sure the number of cases is being exaggerated, e.g. by publishing a figure on the News each day of the number of people who have died with a positive Covid test within the last 28 days (which would include many people who have died of other medical conditions or through accident), one reason for the apparently low number of reported infections in these statistics will be that the bulk of people who have Covid-like symptoms don’t contact a doctor. The Government instruction is that people should ring 111. So doctors would frequently not know about infections and therefore not be able to report them.
Reply
Tara
| #
https://youtu.be/OmBj6MWpCew
Reply
Brian
| #
A couple of questions. 1. If the covid 19 virus has never been isolated how are they able to provide figures for infections? 2. Is ordinary influenza included in the spreadsheet or has it now been renamed as CV-19?
I notice Tara’s link above has already been removed by youtube
Reply