Breaking: U.S. Dept. of Defense Data Shatters Official COVID Narrative!
AI-powered DoD data analysis program named “Project Salus” shatters official vaccine narrative, shows A.D.E. accelerating in the fully vaccinated with each passing week.
The alarming findings show that the vast majority of covid hospitalizations are occurring among fully-vaccinated individuals and that outcomes among the fully vaccinated are growing worse with each passing week. This appears to fit the pattern of so-called Antibody Dependent Enhancement, where the treatment intervention (mRNA vaccines) is worsening health outcomes and leading to excess hospitalizations and deaths.
These data, presented here, shatter the official Biden / Fauci narrative that falsely claims America is experiencing, “a pandemic of the unvaccinated.” The data show that the pandemic actually appears to be accelerated by covid-19 vaccines, while unvaccinated individuals are having far better outcomes than the vaccinated.
Furthermore, according to these data (shown below), the single best strategy for avoid post-vaccine infections and hospitalizations is natural immunity derived from a previous covid infection.
The full analysis is entitled, “Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines against the Delta variant among 5.6M Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older” and is dated Sep. 28, 2021. The presentation of these data consists of 17 slides, which are available at the Humetric website in slide form, also posted on Natural News servers in this PDF versionwhich is more convenient for viewing and printing.
From the JAIC Project Salus document:
In this 80 percent vaccinated 65+ population, an estimated 60 percent of COVID-19 hospitalizations occurred in fully vaccinated individuals in the week ending August 7th.
By August 21st, 71 percent of covid-19 “cases” were occurring among fully vaccinated individuals:
In this 80 percent vaccinated 65+ population, an estimated 71 percent of COVID-19 cases occurred in fully vaccinated individuals.
These data reveal that as the Delta variant approached a 97% infection rate, “cases” and hospitalizations among fully vaccinated individuals showed striking increases with each passing week.
Key findings of the DoD / JAIC / Project Salus / Humetrix analysis
Throughout the slides, “VE” refers to vaccine effectiveness. “Breakthrough” means a failed vaccine, where a fully vaccinated person is diagnosed with covid. Many of those people require hospitalization and ICU treatments (see the slides below).
Some of the key findings of the Project Salus analysis include:
- The effectiveness of mRNA vaccines is confirmed to wane over time.
- With each passing week, those vaccinated with mRNA vaccines show an increasedrisk of vaccine failure / covid infections requiring hospitalization. From the analysis: “Odds ratio increasing to 2.5 at 6 months post vaccination.”
- Natural immunity works: A prior covid infection greatly reduces the odds of a vaccinated person needing hospitalization from a subsequent infection.
Vaccine failure dramatically worsens within 5-6 months after being vaccinated
One slide from the analysis reveals that so-called “breakthrough” infections — vaccine failures — increase with time, showing a near doubling of breakthrough infections among those vaccinated 5-6 months ago vs. those vaccinated only 3-4 months ago.
These data end at August 21st, 2021 but the trend does not appear to be flattening. As more data are added to this analysis each week, it seems almost certain that breakthrough infections rates will continue to rise over time in vaccinated individuals. We do not yet know what will happen in 9 months after vaccination, but these data show cause for serious concern.
The following chart reveals that both Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are showing the same pattern of worsening “breakthrough” infection rates over time. Notice the upward trend of all the bars in this chart, meaning both mRNA vaccines are producing the same increase in infections among the fully vaccinated:
Once the Delta variant took hold, 71 percent of COVID-19 “breakthrough” cases occurred among the fully vaccinated
As the following chart shows, 71 percent of COVID-19 “cases” were breakthrough cases (vaccine failures) once the Delta variant reached 90 percent spread across those infected.
Understand that the authors of this document state that those who are jabbed are not considered “vaccinated” until two weeks after they received the injections, which means that infections, hospitalizations and deaths which occurred from 0 – 14 days are ignored in this data set.
In reality, that means the percentage of “fully vaccinated” people responsible for breakthrough infections, hospitalizations and deaths is substantially higher than what is shown in these data. If they are claiming a 71 percent rate, it may in reality be more like 80 percent or even 90 percent, but we don’t know for sure because they are hiding all negative health outcomes for the first two weeks after the vaccines are administered (by claiming those people are “unvaccinated,” which is a deliberate deception being used to try to hide the harmful effects of vaccines).
Ethnic groups hit hardest: Native Americans, Hispanics and Blacks
Finally, a horrifying slide in the data set reveals that one of the highest risk factors for being hospitalized after being vaccinated is simply being of Native American descent. According to the data in this slide, Native Americans face around 50 percent higher odds of being hospitalized after being vaccinated, compared to other ethnic groups such as Whites.
Hispanics face a slightly lower risk which appears to be around 40 percent higher odds. Blacks face around 25 percent higher odds.
Why is this the case? The gain-of-function properties which were engineered into the SARS-CoV-2 biological weapon — via Fauci, Daszak and the NIH — target ACE2 receptors which exist in higher densities in targeted organ systems of many minority groups such as Native Americans, Hispanics and Blacks.
This has led many observers to conclude that the covid spike protein — which is generated in the bodies of those who take mRNA vaccines — is a race-specific bioweapon designed to achieve depopulation of minority groups.
Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam, has engaged in many efforts to bring this to the attention of his followers, for example. These data provided by the DoD / JAIC / Project Salus document shown here appear to support the plausibility of such theories.
Other factors that greatly increase a person’s odds of being hospitalized after receiving vaccinations include kidney failure (ESRD), morbid obesity, chronic liver disease or receiving chemotherapy.
Natural immunity offers documented protect against future hospitalization
Finally, the data presented in this document shows that natural immunity — listed as “prior covid-19” substantially decreases the risk of hospitalization after receiving covid-19 vaccines. (See slide above.)
What this means is that the best way to ensure the safest outcome of a covid vaccine is to experience a covid infection before getting vaccinated. This dramatically reduces your risk of negative health outcomes.
Then again, if someone has already had covid, why would they need a vaccine in the first place? If anything, these data show that anyone choosing to receive covid-19 vaccines is making the wrong choice if they desire to avoid infections, hospitalizations or deaths.
Natural immunity, once again, is revealed as the most effective status that reduces negative outcomes.
Conclusion
In conclusion, these data from the DoD / JAIC absolutely shatter the false narrative of Biden, Fauci, Walensky and other “authorities” who are still attempting to gaslight the American people into thinking that hospitals are filled with unvaccinated people. In reality, the vast majority of hospitalizations and deaths are occurring among those who were fully vaccinated, according to the 5.6 million people studied in this particular data set (Medicare).
Importantly, post-vaccine health outcomes are worsening over time, meaning that the vaccines appear to be gradually damaging the immune system over subsequent months, making vaccinated individuals far more vulnerable to subsequent infections.
This is the very definition of ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement), about which many analysts such as Dr. Sherri Tenpenny have warned. Now, it appears that ADE is no longer merely a theory but rather a confirmed phenomenon reflected in official Medicare data.
Attorney Thomas Renz told Natural News today that these data should immediately result in not just the FDA’s revocation of mRNA vaccine EUA and approval status, but that the FDA, Fauci and Big Pharma’s top executives should be sued under RICO Act violations for racketeering and organized crime.
See more here: cracknewz.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Alan
| #
If 60% of hospitalisations are in the 80% vaccinated group then 40% are in the 20% not vaccinated group, so there is a higher rate of hospitalisation in the unvaccinated group. PSI continues to promote articles with basic errors in the assessment. The key issue to be examined must be the reasons for hospitalisations. The unvaccinated group are there because they are suffering from Covid. The vaccinated group might be hospitalised because of problems related to the vaccine. We also have no idea about existing conditions of either group.
Where is the evidence to support the claim that a prior infection reduces risk of hospitalisation with a second infection?
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi ASlan,
Statistics is not my thing because it seems that the selection of criteria is done to get the desired outcome. However, if they will count anyone who has had the vaccine for less than 2 weeks as unvaccinated it seems to me that when measuring the vaccinated hospitalized they should be a consideration of how long ago they were vaccinated. If the immunity from the vaccination lasts for 6 months then the current hospitalization rate should be compared to the vaccinated percentage 6 months ago, not the current vaccination percentage.
Herb
Reply
very old white guy
| #
You seem to have difficulty reading Alan.
Reply
Robert Kernodle
| #
Alan said, “If 60% of hospitalisations are in the 80% vaccinated group then 40% are in the 20% not vaccinated group, so there is a higher rate of hospitalisation in the unvaccinated group. ”
In what world is 40% greater than 60%?
Rate IS the percentage. … 60 is greater than 40, right? — 60 is associated with the vaccinated group. 40 would be associated with the unvaccinated group.
If my understanding of the numbers are correct, then this would mean that the TOTAL population being considered in that report was 7,000,000. … 80% of that would be the 5,600,000 vaccinated. … 20% of that would be 1,400,000 unvaccinated.
Now 60% of 5,600,000 = 3,360,000 fully vaccinated, hospitalized, and
40% of 1,400,000 = 560,000 UNvaccinated hospitalized,
out of the TOTAL population of 7,000,000.
If I have screwed up here somewhere, then try to forgive me, offer a correction, and moderator please delete my screw up. Otherwise, I’m not seeing the logic of Alan’s claim.
Reply
Robert Kernodle
| #
Okay, I totally blew the math in my earlier comment, due to a lazy reading of the document.
I still stand by my position that Alan is even farther off then I am. Alan was flat-out wrong, whereas I was flat-out confused and willing to correct.
I went back and did a less lazy reading of the document, and, now, as near as I can figure, the study is reporting 55K TOTAL … COVID-19 hospitalizations from the group.
60% of 55K total COVID hospitalizations = 33K COVID-19-vaccinated breakthrough hospitalizations.
40% of 55K total COVID hospitalizations = 22K COVID-19-unvaccinated hospitalizations.
This clearly indicates that the COVID-19 vaccinated-breakthroughs are the majority of COVID-19 hospitalizations.
If I’m still confused, somebody help me.
Reply
denis dombas
| #
it looks to me that Alan is either uninformed yet about the “agenda” or simply troll!
Reply
John V
| #
Alan says “ so there is a higher rate of hospitalisation in the unvaccinated group.”
Take 1000 people.
80% “vaccinated” (actually got the jab, whatever it is, basically, the people that volunteered to be part of the clinical trial)
Equals 800 people had the jab
60% hospitalizations of that group = 480 people
20% in the control group (did not get the jab)
Equals 200 people
40% hospitalizations of that group = 80 people
So, jabbed people have accounted for 6x the amount of hospitalizations compared to the non-jabbed.
Math is not your strong point.
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi John,
Math is not my strong point but I think you have it wrong.
It is not that 60% of the vaccinated or 40% of the unvaccinated are being hospitalized. That would be millions of patients. Of the hospitalized patients 60% are vaccinated and 40% are unvaccinated. If both groups were getting ill at the same rate you’d expect 80% of them to be vaccinated and 20% to be unvaccinated.
The problem is that the unvaccinated have always been unvaccinated while the vaccinated group includes people who got the shot 2 weeks ago and people who got the shot a year ago, so the percentage of vaccinated has continuously grown but the length of exposure for the two groups is not the same.The proper way to do the test is to have two groups given either a placebo or a vaccine at the same time.Then as time passes you can compare how many in the two groups get the disease. This was how theist was supposed to be run, but the pharmaceutical companies destroyed the test when after a short time before ADE and other effects occurred when they vaccinated the placebo group. I expect as time passes and the rate of vaccinations decreases we will see the hospitalization being almost exclusively the vaccinated. The vaccination will give short lived protection while the unvaccinated who get the disease will have longterm protection.
Herb
Reply
Squidly
| #
Absolutely agree with you Herb
Reply
Tom O
| #
Your reasoning is fine, Herb, with the exception that a person getting “jabbed” should not be getting sick from the “disease” his jab was supposed to protect him from, in under a year at least. The “variants” aren’t going to wander that far in that period of time the the immune system wouldn’t recognize them. From a realistic point of view, then, there should be NO vaccinated people being hospitalized for the disease..
Remember, this “jab” has only been around for 9 months or so. From Dec,. 2019 on, when so many people were coming down with “the disease,” millions and millions should have gotten immunity from being sick. The “jab” obviously either negates the immunity gained from being sick, as well as being ineffective against the disease if people are now being hospitalized with it.
Your comment that the unvaccinated have always been unvaccintaed also doesn’t hold up when you look at the fact that “the jabbed” aren’t considered vaccinated until 2 weeks after their final shot. You do need to know, then, the percentage of those being called unvaccinated are, in fact, people with 1 shot already , as well as those that have had 2 shots but are under 14 days after the second one was administered. But under no circumstance should it matter how long ago someone got their jabs – they were sold as being permanently effective, not as something you were going to need every 24 weeks or less.
Reply
Robert Kernodle
| #
Oops, I think I screwed up my detailed math previously, using the very assumption that you say is not the case here.
Reply
Tom
| #
If there is a covid thing, it is contained within the mRNA poison injections. Doctors are finding strange beings and objects in these injection potions when put under the microscope. The pictures of that 3 legged thing is spooky…and it’s alive!.
Reply
Doug Johnson
| #
Mobile graphene travellers
Reply
A Reasonable Man
| #
One thing is clear, the efficacy of the “COVID shot” is no where near what they claimed it to be. I am seeing more and more articles even in MSM that discuss this, although usually in a round about sort of way to dodge censorship or backlash from mindless herd members. Some people in gov’t and media may be wising up. Think what will happen if it becomes clear that: 1) Shots are not effective and 2) they may hurt you and your children and 3) they lied ,propagandized and covered up adverse reactions. There will be no place to hide and no security force capable of protecting the officials and heads of state that forced these injections on so many innocent trusting citizens. Talk about an angry mob with torches and pitch forks!
Reply
Tom O
| #
One other thing I find disturbing about this article is the implication that the “jab” is being presented almost as if it was a racial weapon. Here again we are faced with “whitey” hates everyone else so he creates a disease or spike that wipes out the non-whites. It is a fact that diet has a lot to do with how people get sick. It is a fact that coronaviruses are less effective against people with higher levels of vitamin D in their system. Why do we have to imply that this may be racially motivated when there are so many other factors that should be considered first? Isn’t there enough “race hate” already?
Reply
BCPoppy
| #
Salus (Latin: salus, “safety”, “salvation”, “welfare”) was a Roman goddess. She was the goddess of safety and well-being (welfare, health and prosperity) of both the individual and the STATE. Well, well. Sneaky bâtards, aren’t they? Even their secret program is deceptively named.
It could be presumed that the DOD, among others, wishes to limit/extinguish the lives of the people, for the well-being of the State. Wouldn’t be the first time, eh?
Reply
Josh
| #
Evidence of waning immunity is not evidence of ADE. More utter shite from Natural News.
Reply
aaron
| #
hey josh
denial will not make it so
have a good day
Reply
dg
| #
No, the rampant increase of hospitalization and death after waning immunity, is the evidence of ADE, where those hospitalizations and deaths were not there in the data prior to vaccination. Perhaps reading graphs isn’t your strong suit.
Reply
dg54321
| #
Looks like Humetrix’s website is gone. The Powerpoint was deleted before that, as I went to try to cite it in a debate a week or so ago, and got a 404 error then. They are purging this inconvenient data to avoid the truth getting out.
Whatever you do, save this data and disseminate it wherever possible. Likely they will try to shut down your web server next if you get this info out to too many people and it’s cited in discussions…..these people are pure evil.
Reply
OhBother
| #
Let’s recall, for many years the CDC influenza like illnesses (ILI) data included all pathigens ie bacteria, viral, molds, etc then the magic PCR test put ILI 2020 data to zilch. Recall all the speculation by xperts to why FLU disappeared. This report is pure garbage, aka more smoke n mirrors.
Reply