Authorities Still Insist Covid ‘Vaccines’ Are Safe And Effective

We have been repeatedly told that the modified-mRNA COVID “vaccine” products are safe and effective.

Those two words have been drummed into our heads via official government communications, marketing, and “Mockingbird” corporate media surrogates.

These marketing/propaganda efforts are consistent with the field of psychology known as neurolinguistic programming- essentially hypnotism.

Both words are fraudulent in the case of the COVID modified-mRNA “vaccine” products.

The lack of safety has been described and demonstrated at length, most notoriously in the case of myocarditis, as has the repeated and concerted efforts of Government officials from within the USG and across the world to withhold and suppress information, data, and discussion of the lack of safety of these products.

But what about the claim that these products are “effective”?

Like safety, effectiveness is a broad term which can mean many different things. In theory, one could define a vaccine as being effective if it elicits an innate or adaptive immune response, without making any claims about the potential benefits of that immune response.

One could then design and perform clinical trials to demonstrate that an immune response was generated in the majority of research volunteers after receiving the product. Technically, one could then obtain FDA marketing authorization (licensure) for such a product based on that claim.

But who would care? Only the most corrupt financially incentivized physicians would prescribe such a product. It would be unlikely that insurers would reimburse for such a product- because there would be no clear linkage between the administered product and a beneficial health outcome.

I am allergic – ergo my body makes an immune response – to a certain type of hay (fescue). Does that make fescue hay a vaccine? You get the point. Effectiveness is entirely context dependent.

And the context for claiming effectiveness is defined by the labeled “Indication” for the product, which in turn is derived from the design of the clinical trials performed to support licensure for that indication.

What is a given product effective for?

Entirely context dependent, and in the case of real world pharmaceutical product development, the answer to this question drives the entire product development plan. For the big boys like Novartis, even this question is secondary to the fundamental questions of unmet market need and size.

If there is a billion dollar (annual) global health market that has not been addressed, Novartis will invest in product development to meet that need – regardless of whether or not it has a specific product candidate. Less than a billion?

Novartis is generally uninterested in investing. And typically that investment will be driven by some sort of mock up of an “indication” which the marketing people determine is sufficiently robust to support penetration into that market.

That is the normal course of affairs

But in the case of the COVIDcrisis, it is now clear that the US Government, working in cooperation with the CCP/PLA and other State and non-State actors (specifically including EcoHealth Alliance), created their own market, cooperated with its subcontractors (Pfizer and Moderna) to create and sell a product to address the unmet medical need to other countries across the world, and then aggressively controlled that market to create a monopoly through censorship and propaganda methods.

Only allowing market entry of their engineered and endorsed product – the COVID gene therapy-based “vaccines”.

Both the US HHS (FDA and CDC) and the US DoD, together with WHO and the Gates Foundation, have been at the center of this monopolistic, illegal and immoral racketeering. This global crime against humanity.

These agencies and NGO were actively supported in this crime by the Five Eyes Intelligence alliance and a wide range of “Mockingbird media” partners who profited enormously from their collusion.

That is the inconvenient truth which underlies all this sorry tale

And that is a gross perversion of my industry (clinical research) and the broader pharmaceutical industry.

In general, Pharma is indeed corrupt in so many ways, but like the US Government not all who labor in that industry are corrupt, and there are many ethical companies committed to actually improving human health.

See more here substack.com

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (2)

  • Avatar

    Tom

    |

    All authorities constantly lie and use propaganda because so many trust them and this is the very reason you should NEVER trust any of them.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Kevin Doyle

    |

    Robert W Malone MD, MS,

    I was brought up as an idealist, perhaps, similar to you. A world where we believed most people were ethical and wanted the best for others. Especially, doctors and people who created medicines to help cure illness.
    Unfortunately, I grew up.
    Then, I realized pharma companies, such as Pfizer, had millions and billions of reasons (pronounced $$$) to be unethical. Covid injection reimbursement is $80 per idiot from U.S. Government.
    Maybe, tell a little white-lie? Maybe, tell a bigger lie? Then, tell huge lies in exchange for a summer house in the Hampton’s; a ski house in Aspen; and islands in the Caribbean.
    Who knew one could sell their Soul so easily? We all thought that was the stuff of Fairy Tales…

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via