This is a common question posed by low information useful idiots who swallow the doomsaying media climate narrative. Yes, of course, there are thousands of scientists qualified to the highest levels (some Nobel Prize winners, too!) that are skeptical about man-made global warming.

“We are all born ignorant,” Benjamin Franklin once said, “but one must work very hard to remain stupid.”

Greens are incensed over suggestions that anything but fossil fuels and climate change might be turning green California and Australian ecosystems into black wastelands, incinerating wildlife, destroying homes and killing people.

How many doomsday predictions about the Earth’s climate must fail before they finally get broadly ignored and dismissed out of hand?

Considering the track record of climate predictions that turned out to be false, we are well passed the moment of ridicule.

Climate Change has become a fanatical religion because there is no proof and it rests entirely on belief. This is taking on the traits of the religious dispute which marked the fall of Rome – Pagans v Christianity. Like the Pagans, they immediately attack anyone who dares to disagree with them and they will not tolerate even a discussion.

In my articles in September and October last year I addressed UK electricity generation and the Gridwatch website. There are various fanciful claims in the media about how much of our electricity is produced by the so-called ‘renewables’.

My favorite movie: “They Live”

Because I feel like I am dealing with some sort of clandestine freak aliens pretending to be our scientists, who stare at me and blink:

Here’s a small sample of peer reviewed science journals that conclude that man made CO2 is not a significant source of global climate changes, but rather the sun or other natural factors:

From “Is Global Warming Mainly Due to Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas Emissions?” (Is Global Warming Mainly Due to Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas Emissions?)

It wasn’t so long ago that Sir David Attenborough came across as a calm voice of reason.

His much-admired documentaries touched on environmental issues but were not driven by them; they were not morality plays.

But something seems to have got into Sir David. He has become a Greta of the third age.

It’s the usual story. It’s the beginning of the year and the statistics of the previous year are hurriedly collected to tell the story of the ongoing climate crisis.

First off, we have the oceans which, according to some, are living up to the apocalyptic narrative better than the atmosphere.

If someone suddenly receives so much attention and is the rising star on the world stage, that is usually no coincidence. Also in the case of the Swedish climate and environmental activist Greta Thunberg it seems that a proper planning had preceded this.

If you want to be entertained as well as educated on what ‘Slayer’ science is all about when it comes to debunking the greenhouse gas theory, then check out the work of Stephen Wells. A Brit now living in Australia, Wells has emerged into the spotlight with a marvelous new book and lively video debate with a top lukewarmer professor.

There has never been a time in modern human history when our planet has been changing as rapidly as it is changing right now.  The sun is behaving very strangely, freakishly cold weather is breaking out all over the world, ocean temperatures continue to rise, volcanoes all over the globe are shooting ash miles into the air,

The ice in Antarctica, how is it doing? Is it melting, is it growing? In the following, we present the latest literature on the subject. There is a lot to report.

Let’s start with the temperature development because along with snowfall, this is the most important control factor for Antarctic inland ice.

We live in a time where every extreme weather or climate-related event is immediately associated with human-caused climate change.

Such associations are often not really about the science of climate, but rather a symbol used to exhort in the political battle over climate change.

Last week, Nature published a damning refutation of a significant body of climate change research. The title of that article is self-explanatory: Ocean acidification does not impair the behavior of coral reef fishes.

The authors studied more than 900 fish from six different species over a period of three years, attempting to verify earlier findings by a team of researchers at Australia’s James Cook University.