Two British psychology professors have put forth a shocking proposal in a Newsweek opinion piece published on Tuesday.
Jared Piazza and Neil McLatchie, psychology professors at Lancaster University, have proposed that ordinary people embrace cannibalism in order to provide an alternative to meat consumption that they see as environmentally destructive.
Or, ‘why we will all end up on three bowls of rice a day.’
We British used to joke about Mr Ying Tong living on one bowl of rice a day, but as we start to experience greater demand for global resources from the developing nations, we might all end up with the same on our plates.
Climate scientists who support human-caused global warming, for example Ben Santer and Michael Mann, authored a peer reviewed paper which acknowledges that their climate models are wrong, although their admission is buried in weasel words and technical jargon:
Technocracy was originally defined as “the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population…” (The Technocrat Magazine, 1938)
After climate researcher Dr Michael Mann’s stunning defeat in his libel court battle versus skeptic, Dr Tim Ball, we look back on how culpable his employers, Penn State University, could be in the ‘cover up crime’ to hide his fraudulent data.
Some fresh new scientific papers are confirming that renewable energies, particularly wind and solar power, are not delivering what was promised – not by a long shot.
They likely will become far more of a burden than a benefit.
Graham Hancock discusses the evidence for a cataclysmic event 12,800 years ago which, he says, many academics would rather you didn’t know about. This short video is an introduction to a fascinating new theory of mass extinction due to a comet impact that ended the last ice age.
In this video I expose, with first-hand evidence, that the peer-review method of modern science is no guarantor of truth, and that peer-review now actively perpetuates and sustains the greatest intellectual and scientific fraud in history.
The increase in fires burning in Brazil set off a storm of international outrage last week. Celebrities, environmentalists, and political leaders blame Brazilian president, Jair Bolsonaro, for destroying the world’s largest rainforest, the Amazon, which they say is the “lungs of the world.”
Efforts to stampede the USA and world into forsaking fossil fuels and modern farming continue apace.
UN and other scientists recently sent out news releases claiming July 2019 was the “hottest month ever recorded on Earth” – nearly about 1.2 degrees C (2.2 degrees F) “above pre-industrial levels.”
We know there is simply no basis for climate alarm.
All “scientific” predictions have failed, life has survived happily with much higher CO2 in the past, the medieval warming period a thousand years ago was much warmer than today.
The small temperature variations of the 20th century are easily explained by natural causes, and the IPCC reports confirm that there is no increase in extreme weather events and no economic harm from CO2.
Update Aug. 26, 2019: This article has been updated with new information from NASA that’s been posted at Science 2.0. You can read it here.
Short summary: We have had wildfires for many years now in the Amazon, even in the tropical rainforest – mainly started by humans for forest clearing and ranching.
Scientists suddenly have a whole lot more data on one of the strangest and most recent mysteries in the cosmos, so-called fast radio bursts. First discovered in 2007, these fleeting blasts of radio waves originate thousands, millions or even billions of light-years from Earth.
In this video you’re going to learn about the greatest fraud which has ever, and which could ever, occur in science. The audacity of the fraud is matched only by its simplicity.
No one needs to be a climate scientist or even to have a college degree to download the CO2 data from the Mauna Loa lab and analyze it and form an obvious conclusion.