I just had a very long conversation with an academic colleague here at work, one who I’ve actually anonymously quoted before in my videos and on some posts. He is of the climate alarmist persuasion.

General Paul E. Vallely (Major General, USA, Ret.) was interviewed by show host Mike Filip on AmeriCanuck Internet Radio of Canada, October 14, 2019.

In a wide-ranging interview Filip and Vallely talked about Q-Anon, Antifa, the Deep State, politics, and the biggest threats facing the US.

Before we spend tens of trillions of dollars on green new mis-dealings that collapse our economy and decimate our reliable energy infrastructure to save the planet from climatological Armageddon, let’s first consider some unsettling scientific questions regarding any “settled science” basis for hysteria.

If 20th century warming was indeed exceptional, then previous warming episodes and all natural
variations must have been smaller. Interestingly, in the first IPCC report of 1990, we saw this graphic (above)  of global temperature since about the year 1000.

A world-renowned expert in animal bone identification has lost her position at the University of Victoria (UVic) for, she believes, telling school kids politically incorrect facts about polar bears.

Politicians and climate alarmists are running what amounts to a promises auction about getting the world to net-zero carbon dioxide emissions in 10 to 30 years.

It’s easy to bid as you will never be held accountable, you look virtuous and bids cost nothing, at least for the time being.

Last Halloween, the Washington Post ran a dramatic headline: Startling new research finds large buildup of heat in the oceans, suggesting a faster rate of global warming.

I often say that we have found ourselves ruled by psychopaths because we have a system wherein (A) those who are willing to do anything to anyone are rewarded with immense wealth, and (B) immense wealth translates directly to immense political power.

Everyone please read and widely share this most excellent exposition of the debunk of climate science and climate alarmism, produced by a reader and commentator.

In the matter of a few months, Greta Thunberg went from a lone girl protesting in front of the Swedish parliament to an international phenomenon. Although mass media is making it seem as if this meteoric rise to prominence happened organically, this is simply not true.

Carbon dioxide emissions are making the Earth greener and more fertile, a United Nations (UN) climate scientist has said.

Modern science has produced some miraculous advances in several fields. None of the ideas proposed or “invented” have ever seen any device that actually could produce energy out of nothing.

Of course, that idea, commonly referred to as a “Perpetual Motion machine” (PMM) and also known as a “Perpetuum mobile,” cannot exist.  The idea has been around for a thousand years or longer by now but all attempts to build one have failed.

Canadian space scientist, Joseph E Postma, explains the false science of the greenhouse gas theory in a friendly Youtube debate. Postma’s influential peer-reviewed paper, ‘The Model Atmosphere Greenhouse Effect’ (Principia Scientific, 2011) is addressed in detail.

The term “dark age” came into popular usage among intellectuals during the 18th century, but the term itself was actually coined by Petrarch.

He was an early Italian Renaissance scholar in the 14th century. It was originally used to describe a certain period of time, but eventually became synonymous with the period between the fall of the Roman Empire and the Renaissance.

Introduction:  Traditional anthropogenic theory of currently observed global warming states that release of carbon dioxide into atmosphere (partially as a result of utilization of fossil fuels) leads to an increase in atmospheric temperature because the molecules of CO₂ (and other greenhouse gases) absorb the infrared radiation from the Earth’s surface.

The US Health and Human Services (HHS) department has been sued and exposed for failing in their duty to conduct the proper scientific research required to demonstrate vaccine safety.

The Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), supported by 55 organizations, representing over 5 million people took the matter to the courts and won.