So this is it: the 50^th anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing. In 2016, a survey showed that 52 percent of the British public thought that Apollo missions were faked. Skepticism is highest among those who were too young to see it live on TV: 73 percent of aged 25-34 believe we didn’t land on the moon, compared to 38 percent of those aged 55 or more. These numbers seem to be rising every year.

Some members of the United States House are concerned the Pentagon may have unleashed disease-infected ticks that caused the spread of Lyme disease.

The answer to the question—What determines the minimum possible daily air temperature?—is not likely the daily solar radiation.  For most of us have experienced that once the sun sets, the air temperature, which we commonly measure, begins to decrease.

The title of this article is from its description of a new physics that is a fundamental break from past theories. It is the next step in the progress of physics from Aristotle, to Galileo, to Newton, to Einstein.

We are already in the first stages of a deep solar minimum series: Solar Cycle 25.

Even NASA, at the forefront of carbon dioxide (CO2) hysteria, has solar forecasts showing us going over the cliff and into the cold.

Suicide is the 10th leading cause of death in America. While deaths from seven out of those 10 causes are decreasing, the rate at which people take their own lives has risen dramatically over the past two decades.

Sand deposits near the Gobi Desert in China may seem a strange place to look for evidence that cosmic rays can control how clouds are formed and the impact they have on Earth’s climate.

Today’s silly climate-change story concerns the weather in London, which is going to resemble that of Barcelona by 2050.

It’s in the Guardian, so you will probably want to discount its factual accuracy anyway, but if by some mischance they have got it right, well it sounds great, I’m sure you’ll agree.

New study exposes statistical incompetence in public investment projects; research is being contaminated by subjective bias. Too much research work does not meet basic standards of validity and reliability.

Posted July 10, 2019 by Elsevier in papers.ssrn.com is ‘On De-Bunking ‘Fake News’ in the Post-Truth Era: How to Reduce Statistical Error in Research‘ which addresses the crisis of modern scientific research for ‘garbage in, garbage’ data misuse.

250,000 years ago, the polar ice caps expanded widely and deeply. They didn’t start melting back until 26,500 to 10,000 years ago.

There are those who do the usual human thing, boasting or accusing others of racial and ethnic inferiority, or of privilege or superiority. Are they missing the most important, glorious and beautiful points?

In this video I give another empirical demonstration, using a magnifying glass, that basic climate theory and its resulting political weather alarmism is fundamentally flawed at its basis and that the entire field of climate science is basically pseudoscience that even children can refute.

The book, ‘Climate Change Reconsidered II: Fossil Fuels’ is available online for free, in PDF format, at ClimateChangeReconsidered.org. This publication consists of a large book (768 pages) including a 23 page Summary for Policymakers which is also presented as a separate booklet.

A new scientific study could bust wide open deeply flawed fundamental assumptions underlying controversial climate legislation and initiatives such as the Green New Deal, namely, the degree to which ‘climate change’ is driven by natural phenomena vs. man-made issues measured as carbon footprint.

Today I’m at the funeral of my dear friend Christopher Booker.

Were he alive — and I still can’t quite believe he is not — I know exactly what we’d have been talking about this morning: the risible section of last night’s Newsnight which the BBC had cobbled together in a sad, desperate, and unconvincing attempt to debunk the Climategate scandal.