The recent seismic activity in the state of California has taken a strange turn.  According to the Los Angeles Times, there have been more than 80,000 earthquakes in the state since July 4th, and most of those quakes were aftershocks of the two very large events that hit the Ridgecrest area early in the month.

A massive hole has formed in the upper atmosphere of the Sun, and our planet will align with that hole later this week.

Once the alignment happens, Earth will be bombarded by a “solar storm”, and nobody is quite sure yet how bad it will be.

Tony Heller has a new video debunking the latest propaganda from the journal Nature. In it, they claim that we haven’t experienced warming in the past 2,000 years like today’s ‘climate change.’

Scientists writing in Nature say, “they have found there is no evidence for “globally coherent warm and cold periods” over the past 2,000 years prior to industrialization.”

Yet another major research study, five if you’re counting, has concluded that accelerated melting at the base of Greenland’s glacial ice sheet is from anomalously high geothermal heat.

In this video I explain that the accepted debate between the deniers and the alarmists can be debunked by pointing out that the entire paradigm within which the debate is framed is founded on something so ridiculous and easy to refute that it ends up debunking both the main-stream skeptics and the climate alarmists together at the same time!

May I ask you a question? If I lay a pile of dry sticks in preparation for a bonfire in my garden, and a bolt of lightning strikes those dry sticks, are the dry sticks responsible for the fire, or the bolt of lightning?  Clearly the agent is the lightning. Do we all agree?

Credit: Smith609 / Wikimedia Commons

A fossilized trilobite, an ancient type of arthropod: This specimen, from the Burgess Shale, preserves “soft parts” – the antennae and legs is from the Cambrian period when life exploded.

The quest to discover what drove one of the most important evolutionary events in the history of life on Earth has taken a new, fascinating twist.

If you follow the subject of global warming alarm, you will have read many times that there is a “consensus” of “97% of climate scientists” on — well, on something.

I’ve actually never been able to find a precise statement of the proposition on which the 97% supposedly agree. But suppose you can find the statement.

In a recent turn towards the disturbing, a number of jurisdictions including Rhode Island have enacted laws that exclude working papers correspondence and other work product from freedom of information act requests.

International Journal of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resources publishes a new paper showing a significant and growing relationship between mid-ocean seismic activity and global temperatures (extended through 2018).

On July 25, the Heartland Institute will hold its 13th International Conference on Climate Change, at the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C. Heartland has already published at least three, 1,000-page, peer-reviewed volumes on so-called “Climate Change,” under the moniker Climate Change Reconsidered II.

In the last quarter of the 20^th century, James Hansen, former head of the NASA Goodard Institute of Space Studies, utilized false data to promote the nascent global warming movement. The objective being to reduce the use of ‘fossil fuels.’

Camille Veyres presents a one-hour video on the carbon cycle and physics of the atmosphere which debunks the lies told by government academics about CO2 and man-made global warming.

Among the junk science, Veyres also exposes the lie that “The CO2 from “fossil fuels” accumulates in the atmosphere.”

In the olden days, science and politics were independent disciplines. That, however, has changed.

Today’s politicians micromanage science, particularly in heavily politicized countries such as Norway, ostensibly to ensure that science agrees with current policies.