Did you know that over the last 450,000 years there have been four Ice Ages lasting around 100,000 years each?

And five interglacial periods lasting around 12,000 years each?

Look at this graph of temperature data derived from the Vostok ice core from Antarctica.

One of the climate delusion’s greatest frauds was issued by the Center for Biological Diversity which said

“Climate change is drowning and starving polar bears. If greenhouse gas-fueled climate change keeps melting their sea ice habitat, an Arctic apocalypse will wipe them out in a century – and they will disappear from the United States by 2050.”

The climate issue now dominates almost all areas of life. This makes it all the more important that the arguments of the critics of the climate alarm are finally heard seriously.

Unfortunately, this is not the case.

On the contrary, those who do not support the alarmist line will be publicly scolded, possibly obstructing their career and future. An almost perfectly controlled opinion system has been established.

The censorship continues, as a George Soros-linked group has joined forces with the mainstream media to ensure climate skeptics are silenced on YouTube.  The group Avaaz, left-leaning non-profit group, published a report on January 16th on its website that claims YouTube is “profiting by broadcasting misinformation” to millions of people by giving climate denial videos too much prominence.

This is a common question posed by low information useful idiots who swallow the doomsaying media climate narrative. Yes, of course, there are thousands of scientists qualified to the highest levels (some Nobel Prize winners, too!) that are skeptical about man-made global warming.

“We are all born ignorant,” Benjamin Franklin once said, “but one must work very hard to remain stupid.”

Greens are incensed over suggestions that anything but fossil fuels and climate change might be turning green California and Australian ecosystems into black wastelands, incinerating wildlife, destroying homes and killing people.

How many doomsday predictions about the Earth’s climate must fail before they finally get broadly ignored and dismissed out of hand?

Considering the track record of climate predictions that turned out to be false, we are well passed the moment of ridicule.

Climate Change has become a fanatical religion because there is no proof and it rests entirely on belief. This is taking on the traits of the religious dispute which marked the fall of Rome – Pagans v Christianity. Like the Pagans, they immediately attack anyone who dares to disagree with them and they will not tolerate even a discussion.

In my articles in September and October last year I addressed UK electricity generation and the Gridwatch website. There are various fanciful claims in the media about how much of our electricity is produced by the so-called ‘renewables’.

My favorite movie: “They Live”

Because I feel like I am dealing with some sort of clandestine freak aliens pretending to be our scientists, who stare at me and blink:

Here’s a small sample of peer reviewed science journals that conclude that man made CO2 is not a significant source of global climate changes, but rather the sun or other natural factors:

From “Is Global Warming Mainly Due to Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas Emissions?” (Is Global Warming Mainly Due to Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas Emissions?)

It wasn’t so long ago that Sir David Attenborough came across as a calm voice of reason.

His much-admired documentaries touched on environmental issues but were not driven by them; they were not morality plays.

But something seems to have got into Sir David. He has become a Greta of the third age.

It’s the usual story. It’s the beginning of the year and the statistics of the previous year are hurriedly collected to tell the story of the ongoing climate crisis.

First off, we have the oceans which, according to some, are living up to the apocalyptic narrative better than the atmosphere.

If someone suddenly receives so much attention and is the rising star on the world stage, that is usually no coincidence. Also in the case of the Swedish climate and environmental activist Greta Thunberg it seems that a proper planning had preceded this.