In this video I discuss the fallacious reasoning which people sometimes resort to when confronted with the fact that the only theoretical foundation for the climate alarmist greenhouse effect comes from flat earth theory.

Retired Principal Scientific Officer (PSO) for the British Government exposes “discrepancies” in NASA’s Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN) which serve to make recent temperatures seem warmer.

The “mistakes” point to possible fraud intended to give scientific credence to tax raising UK and US climate policies.

In Japan, like many other places around the world, the media like to tell audiences how sea surface temperatures around Japan are rising due to man-made global warming.

But, as is often the case, the data and facts tell the opposite story.

Abstract: In this essay we review how easy it is to make a wrong assumption (have a wrong idea) with possible serious consequences that hinders positive progress.  And from time to time we consider comments to Part 1 made by Michael Clarke and JLK.

Pertinent work that is worthwhile for wider consideration that are buried and lost in the overwhelming, pervasive AGW propaganda from governments, media and academia are summarized below:

It’s amazing that self-proclaimed environmental activists can point fingers from their city dwellings and accuse farmers of destroying the environment.

Recently, a great fuss was made of the fact that farmers in Brazil were burning off their fields in preparation for the growing season.

Some early Tesla models are spontaneously malfunctioning and could cost owners more than $1,800 to repair.

The issue stems from a worn-out flash memory chip embedded in the Multi-Media Controller board that activates the control screen and executes most functions.

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) agrees human CO₂ is only 5 percent and natural CO₂ is 95 percent of the CO₂ inflow into the atmosphere. The ratio of human to natural CO₂ in the atmosphere must equal the ratio of the inflows.

Mainstream climate science claims CO2 molecules “slow down the rate of heat loss from the surface” as a blanket does.

And yet the rate at which a CO2 molecule retains or slows down heat loss is, at most, a negligible 0.0001 of a second.

I just had a very long conversation with an academic colleague here at work, one who I’ve actually anonymously quoted before in my videos and on some posts. He is of the climate alarmist persuasion.

General Paul E. Vallely (Major General, USA, Ret.) was interviewed by show host Mike Filip on AmeriCanuck Internet Radio of Canada, October 14, 2019.

In a wide-ranging interview Filip and Vallely talked about Q-Anon, Antifa, the Deep State, politics, and the biggest threats facing the US.

Before we spend tens of trillions of dollars on green new mis-dealings that collapse our economy and decimate our reliable energy infrastructure to save the planet from climatological Armageddon, let’s first consider some unsettling scientific questions regarding any “settled science” basis for hysteria.

If 20th century warming was indeed exceptional, then previous warming episodes and all natural
variations must have been smaller. Interestingly, in the first IPCC report of 1990, we saw this graphic (above)  of global temperature since about the year 1000.

A world-renowned expert in animal bone identification has lost her position at the University of Victoria (UVic) for, she believes, telling school kids politically incorrect facts about polar bears.

Politicians and climate alarmists are running what amounts to a promises auction about getting the world to net-zero carbon dioxide emissions in 10 to 30 years.

It’s easy to bid as you will never be held accountable, you look virtuous and bids cost nothing, at least for the time being.

Last Halloween, the Washington Post ran a dramatic headline: Startling new research finds large buildup of heat in the oceans, suggesting a faster rate of global warming.