Anyone defending the Bill Gates/WHO global vaccine program needs to explain this study: Mogensen et al 2017.
Prior to 2017, neither HHS nor WHO ever performed the kind of vaccinated/unvaccinated (or placebo) study necessary to ascertain if the DTP vaccine actually yields beneficial health outcomes.
Mainstream media in the U.S. and internationally is falsely claiming that US President Donald Trump recommended injecting bleach as a treatment for coronavirus. The lie was broadcast on American news channels, the UK’s BBC and elsewhere.
Families of cancer patients whose loved ones are not able to receive treatment in hospitals because of the coronavirus pandemic have slammed videos which show nurses dancing as “disrespectful.”
At the top of Google News searches for “climate change” yesterday, the UK Guardian published an article titled, “Will Florida be lost forever to the climate crisis?”
The article claims, “If scientists are right, the lower third of the state will be underwater by the end of the century.”
The coronavirus scandal, with billionaire oligarch “pandemic expert” Bill Gates pushing horror scenarios into the media, has contributed to politicians’ reaction of fear.
This, combined with mass media hysteria, has, in turn, caused a once-in-a-century financial depression.
I was prompted to write this after seeing two online newspaper articles linking climate change to virus epidemics. Some of the claims are truly absurd, and I have reproduced the relevant paragraphs and commented on them.
Everyone who has been paying attention knows that the epidemiological models on which the current shutdown mania is based have been proved to be wrong, wrong, wrong. Yet, zombie-like, they continue to influence our ill-informed policymakers.
Climate science research and assessments have misused scenarios for more than a decade.
Symptoms of this misuse include the treatment of an unrealistic, extreme scenario as the world’s most likely future in the absence of climate policy and the illogical comparison of climate projections across inconsistent global development trajectories.
Since the intervention of the President of the USA, Donald Trump announcing that the FDA approved Hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID-19, the news spread that a treatment was now available.
When the IMHE models were introduced, there was a pretty high peak in the number of COVID-19 infections. Related to this high peak, there were a significant number of hospitalizations and deaths in a very short time period.
A respiratory therapist with 21 years of professional experience who works in a hospital in Georgia has posted a video on YouTube in which he explains all the problems, contradictions, and inconsistencies with the official narrative of the alleged COVID-19 ‘pandemic’.
At the very same time the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Dr Fauci and the media are deriding HCQ as ‘unsafe’ for treating COVID-19, the NIH backs dozens of clinical trials of Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as a safe treatment for cancer. How can that be?
Doctors and experts on a panel created by the National Institutes of Health are recommending against using hydroxychloroquine, an anti-malaria drug, with azithromycin, an antibiotic known as Z-Pak, in the treatment of COVID-19.
In March 12th, 2020, Anderson Cooper and Dr. Sanjay Gupta held a global town hall on “Corona Facts and Fears.” During the discussion, Anderson said to the viewing audience, “And, again, if you are concerned about coronavirus, and you haven’t gotten a flu shot…you should get a flu shot.”
Philosopher Nicholas Rescher once wrote, “Scientific discoveries are often made not on the basis of some well-contrived plan of investigation, but through some stroke of sheer luck.”
For a team of researchers at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) in Laurel, Maryland, that statement couldn’t be more true.
We have been given a very clear narrative about the declared coronavirus pandemic.
The UK State has passed legislation, in the form of the Coronavirus Act, to compel people to self isolate and practice social distancing in order to delay the spread of SARS-CoV-2 (SC2).