Anger is growing as evidence emerges that the UK government’s botched attempt to test the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID19 negligently and criminally exceeded the recommended safe dosage by a factor of TWELVE!
Noted medical doctor is gaining attention for a startling new analysis of the pandemic. It shows evidence from official data proving that, among other inconvenient facts, the case fatality rate for influenza was similar to COVID19. Over-reaction and panic triggered deadly disruption to routine but critical medical services.
In short, the global ‘Lockdown’ was not only unnecessary, it caused many tens of thousands of avoidable and unrelated deaths.
Written by Professor Felix I. D. Konotey-Ahulu, et al
(OMNS September 2, 2020) The Oxford Vaccine for COVID-19 [1,2] asks the question “How does this prospective treatment provide efficient protection right now for front line health workers, many of whom are dying despite the stringent protective measures?”
IN THE CASE OF RISING CO2, photosynthesis will go up and there will be a greening of the earth as in the images above but this effect varies regionally. It is a strong function of the local ecosystem variables the most important being the availability of water.
The monsoon has roared back in August with excess rain of 26% and is likely to be among the wettest since 1901, when the weather office started recording official data.
Rainfall is already at a record in India’s mid-latitude states including Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, and Odisha.
This article covers the last two weeks in August and reports on some interesting statistical anomalies and peculiar advice given about the ongoing ‘pandemic’ as unfolding in the United Kingdom.
The graph (above) is the number of new cases recorded for two densely populated locations, the city of Birmingham and town of Solihull for August (these locations are a mere 7 miles apart-see map below).
Last week we revealed that the CDC quietly admitted only 9,200 deaths were directly attributed to the ‘novel coronavirus’ COVID19. We argue that even that number is WAY TOO HIGH. This is because there exists no verifiable medical evidence that ANYONE died from the virus at all.
ALLCOVID19 deaths are simply ASSUMED to be from the virus. No autopsies nor any verifiable test on a deceased patient – which would legally stand up in court – has been produced to scientifically verify ANY death from COVID19.
With the number of extreme weather days rising around the globe in recent years due to global warming, it is no surprise that there has been an upward trend in hospital visits and admissions for injuries caused by high heat over the last several years.
It isn’t widely known (probably because neither the government nor the main stream media have mentioned it) but it is now possible to obtain an official mask exemption certificate (photo, above) from the British Government website.
Simply put `British government mask exemption’ into your least un-favourite search engine.
This short essay is all about light and is really asking questions rather than proposing new theory.
It all stems from personal experience way back during WWII and observation of Searchlights and their attempts to illuminate the Bombers heading towards the city that I lived near, Coventry.
In the words of his publisher, it demonstrates that “failures in peer review and mistakes in statistics have rendered a shocking number of scientific studies useless.”
California leads the way to electricity blackouts, closely followed by South Australia. They both created this problem by taxing, banning, delaying or demolishing reliable coal, nuclear, gas or hydro generators while subsidising and promoting unreliable electricity from the sickly green twins – solar and wind.
I’ve mentioned several times in previous articles I am acquainted with a retired former government scientist. At retirement he was at G7 level, and was involved in number-crunching and data-analysis for various areas of government. He had also advised a previous Prime Minister on matters of medical science.
Positronium is positively puzzling. A new measurement of the exotic “atom” — consisting of an electron and its antiparticle, a positron — disagrees with theoretical calculations, scientists report in the Aug. 14 Physical Review Letters. And physicists are at a loss to explain it.