In this newsletter I will provide the links to the irrefutable evidence demonstrating that the Australian government’s vaccination policies are founded on unproven claims about the safety and efficacy of childhood vaccines

It’s an intriguing hypothesis put forward in a new paper by astronomer Michael Efroimsky from the US Naval Observatory in Washington DC

In 2021 we reported on a pair of studies (here and here) that analysed satellite-measured data and found that clouds were not shielding the Earth’s surface from incoming solar radiation as much as they used to, causing an increase in heat absorption at the surface which accounts for much of the warming experienced in the past few years without reference to ‘greenhouse gases’

“Many, many thousands” of COVID-19 patients died because they were put on ventilators and denied treatment with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine or even vitamin D, respiratory therapist Mark Bishofsky told CHD.TV

A new car safety study has proven that electric vehicles (EVs) are too heavy to be restrained by US guardrails that line roads in case of accidents, researchers at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln said

The dataset that they give researchers has people who were vaccinated and died removed. This makes the vaccines seem safe

Rebekah Barnett’s Substack of 17 Sept. HERE reported on the first independent testing of Australian vials of COVID-19 “vaccine” which showed dangerous levels of synthetic plasmid DNA (which contains about 7,000 nucleoside base pairs) contamination between 7 – 145 times the allowable safety limits

The bad news is we’re all going to die. The good news is it’s going to take a lot longer than it used to

Before we go into vaccine case control studies the bias issue at hand is pretty easy to understand and it might surprise you to learn that you have probably already encountered it in everyday life, from dating and when forming friendships

A woman has won a “landmark” case against a council arguing she was kept awake by streetlights

The late great P.J. O’Rourke once wrote, in The Atlantic in April 2002, that: “Beyond a certain point complexity is fraud…. when someone creates a system in which you can’t tell whether or not you’re being fooled, you’re being fooled.”

When it comes to our experience of the internet, “the times, they are a-changin’“, as Bob Dylan would say

The latest, greatest exercise in absurd climate-modeling hubris is the frankly preposterous project to create “Digital Twins of the Earth” inside the models, to overcome their hopelessly limited power to simulate the actual climate by, um, PR or something

Scientific American’s recent endorsement of Kamala Harris brought me back to Nature’s endorsement of Joe Biden in 2020, both of which signal a stark departure from the traditionally apolitical stance science journals have historically taken