Australia’s Fair Work Act 2009 used to Remove Informed Consent
And he did this at the same time as he permitted premiers to direct employers to mandate vaccines, even though this policy is contrary to legislation in Australia’s federal Health Acts.
This was achieved by the government using the Fair Work Act 2009 to tell a lie to all judges.
The lie the government told was that ”the COVID ‘vaccine’ was for the good of the community” (two lies in fact because it is an untested drug not a ‘vaccine’).
It was this lie to the Fair Work Commission that made it impossible for judges to rule against the government narrative. I have attached the details of this corruption of the Fair Work Act 2009 to this email and I will also summarise the main points here:
- The Fair Work Act 2009 was implemented to prevent discrimination and unlawful practices – yet in 2021 the Act was used to do both of these things.
- The Fair Work Commission informed all judges that the COVID vaccines were for the ‘good of the community’. When the opposite is true. These are untested drugs that will (and are) destroying the community.
- Fact: Mandating any medication in a genetically diverse population will destroy the genetic fabric of the population. Many genes pre-dispose individuals to over 500 chronic illnesses and these genes can remain dormant in a persons’ lifetime if an environmental factor does not switch it on. This is the well-known field of science called Epigenetics.
- The strategy that is being used by the WHO through our government is to make the population sick (or dead) using ‘vaccines’ (aka untested genetic technology) and then to blame all the sickness and deaths on the ‘COVID virus‘ – as the government (and media) is currently doing by informing employers that “it is the COVID virus that caused all the sickness in the workplace last year”.
- This is leading to population control and surveillance through the WHO. You will notice that the government has now legislated for all farmers to use these ‘vaccines’ (mRNA untested drugs) on their livestock in order to sell them at the cattle yards.
- My prediction is that you will soon hear about a ‘virus’ making the livestock sick (eg. foot and mouth etc) and this will lead to the government instructing farmers to kill the livestock and bring about a meat shortage. A tried and tested blue print.
- Who asks about the vaccination status or hormone/antibiotic treatments of the livestock when they inform us about Foot and Mouth ‘virus’ outbreaks in the media?
It is the environment and toxins that are causing the sickness in the population. These are the most important factors in the expression of disease in humans and animals. Microorganisms do not become pathogenic unless there is a poor environment – terrain theory explains why a virus/bacteria becomes pathogenic under certain conditions.
Please read my article below and we must make the government accountable for misusing the Fair Work Act 2009 to commit a crime against the people. We must also remove ourselves from the WHO’s International Health Regulations to save humanity.
Australia’s Fair Work Commission should be independent from the government, but in 2021 it became a tool of the state. This is a situation that has occurred in a similar manner in authoritarian states in the past, including Nazi Germany.
Government capture of the Fair Work Commission has significant implications for our fundamental human rights because it is the primary reason why employee mandates for experimental mRNA gene injections (falsely promoted to the public as ‘COVID vaccines’) could be permitted in 2021.
The action of mandating a medical intervention wa s contrary to the legislative purpose of the Fair Work Act 2009 which was to prevent discrimination and the use of unlawful practices in the workplace.
But in 2021 the Act was used to create discrimination by requiring employee ’s medical information , that is protected under privacy laws, to be revealed to employers and by permitting employers to coerce employees into a medical intervention – vaccination – that was not legally permitted in any workplace contracts in Australia prior to 2021.
The mandating of experimental injections by employers has also happened despite Australia signing and ratifying the Nuremburg Code written in 1947 to prevent this criminal situation.
Whilst the Fair Work Commission was supposed to be independent in 2021 this was compromised by its dir ective for all judges and employers to support the government’s policy on vaccination for the ‘good of the community’ : a similar model was used by the head of the judiciary in Germany in 1942 – 45.
S upport from the judiciary in Australia was solidified by the FWC’s directions to judges that included com ments that ensured the judiciary knew they had to rule with the government for the ‘good of the community’.
The following comment used in Nazi Germany shows how this solidarity from judges can be achieved: “At a time when the best of our people are risking their lives… and… tirelessly working for victory, there can be no place for criminals who destroy the will of the community.”
Mandating any medication in a genetically div erse population will destroy the genetic fabric of the population. Many genes pre-dispose individuals to over 500 chronic illnesses and these genes can remain dormant in a persons’ lifetime if an environmental factor does not switch it on. This is the well-known field of science called epigenetics.
Consequently, medical practitioner’s guidelines require informed consent for every medical intervention they recommend, particularly in healthy people. The use of coercion in medicine is the opposite to health promotion in the community because health outcomes are dependent upon genetics and other environmental factors.
This ‘group think’ about vaccination was further enhanced by the bullying culture of the media. Journalists used the word ‘antivaxxer’ to denigrate as irresponsible, any citizen who questioned the claim that vaccination was for the‘good of the community’ or that this untested drug was even a ‘vaccine’.
Just ‘follow the science’ authorities said without providing any evidence. The claim that vaccination is for the ‘good of the community’ is not supported by the principles or ethics of medical practice because genetics pre-determines the health outcomes from drugs/vaccines.
Further, it is not being implemented by medical practitioners. The policy is being implemented by politicians under direction from the World Health Organisatio n (WHO) who is being influenced by the public – private partnerships in the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI).
This is a significant fact because it means global health policies are being designed with influence from corporations within the GAVI: a body established by the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation in 1999 that includes the pharmaceutical companies, the biotechnology companies, many philanthropists and the World Bank and International Monetary Fund etc.
These a re the companies and individuals that profit from the drugs and vaccines that are being recommended with financial incentives in global health policies.
The GAVI alliance is also the body that links the economies of all WHO member countries to public health issues , hence governments acted in lockstep in 2020 to implement policies that removed human rights and destroyed economies under the guise of ‘the community good’.
All the directives implemented to control an alleged pandemic in 2020 were the opposite to how we have traditionally controlled infectious diseases and promoted health in the community.
In other words, the United Nation’s WHO is the front for corporations t o influence the design of government health policies . In essence , a one world government with direction coming from unelected foreign individuals and corporations.
This is fascism producing global totalitarianism.
Significantly, the WHO declared a pandemic in 2020 without any real data from each country. The declaration was based solely on the mathematical modelling performed by the corporations /institutions in the GAVI alliance that were due to profit from this situation.
The Fair W ork Commission in Australia was the primary reason why vaccines could be mandated in the workplace in 2021 , even though i) employers did not provide a risk assessment of COVID disease in the workplace or for the COVID mRNA ‘vaccines’ and ii) the government did not have any legislation that permitted an employer to mandate any v accine.
When a government legislative body such as the Fair Work Commission modifies the laws to claim that a medication ‘ is for the community good’ , then it is impossible for the community to push back against th is government totalitarianism.
The Fair Work Commission was acting outside of Australia’s constitution by supporting government claims about vaccines in 2020 without supportive medical evidence . It was also breaching the human rights covenants that Australia had ratified for decades.
Coercive vaccination will destroy the genetic and social fabric of society because all vaccines come with a serious risk for many people.
A quote from Adolf Hitler : Mein Kampf explains th e actions by the Fair Work Commission with respect to vaccine mandates“ The great masses of the people …..will more easily fall victims to a great lie than a small one”.
Here is the big lie: vaccine mandates are not ‘for the community good’.
There is no data demonstrating that the benefits of the COVID injections (or any vaccine) far outweigh the harm for most of the population. This claim breaches the fundamental principle and ethics of medicine, hence it is blatantly a lie.
These mandates must be repealed forever to prevent the destruction of humanity and it is the medical doctors that must speak up in support of their medical principles and ethics to ensure that their actions are promoting health and not sickness and death in the population.
About the author: Judy Wilyman PhD, Bachelor of Science, University of NSW. Diploma of Education (Science), University of Wollongong. Master of Science (Population Health), Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Wollongong. PhD in: ‘A critical analysis of the Australian government’s rationale for its vaccination policy’ (the science, politics and ethics of Australia’s vaccination policies), UOW School of Humanities and Social Inquiry.
Header image: NBC News
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Robert Beatty
| #
Judy,
You have cogently explained how we got into this Civid19 vaccination mess. There is enough information here to mount a strong legal case by those interested in righting past wrongs.
The evils you explain are a function of our Top-Down system of government (tdg), which includes several shortcomings, one of which is it provides permanent access for socialist/Marxist ideology. This is now becoming obvious in many parts of our society, and could undermine our economic stability as discussed by Ray Dalio in his book “The Changing World Order”.
An alternate form of leadership is Bottom-Up government (bug), which has been successfully practiced in Switzerland since 1291. My views on how this might be introduced to Australia are at https://bosmin.com/HOME/Bottom-UpGovernment.pdf
Reply
Eric the Red
| #
Bottom-up governing, also known as subsidiarity.
Reply
Robert Beatty
| #
Erik,
Subsidiaries is something different. It still relies on (tdg) to exist. Another term for (bug) is Direct Democracy, but it is easier to refer to it as I have.
Reply
Eric the Red
| #
What was done to the Fair Work Act 2009, is another example of a favorite wokist tactic. In order to advance their agenda, wokists will take an existing law, and change its context, in order to sneak in their desired policy that is now covered within the new context. In this case, the context of the original act was to prevent discrimination and unlawful practices for individual workers. Wokists changed the scope of that context, to allow practices for the ‘community good’. Within that new context, mandatory vaxxinations were easily subsumed.
First note that the context was repurposed from individuals to community. Next note that the language of the changed context is benign, even laudable on its face. It can be easily accepted by the masses, in this case even the courts. But it is also deliberately vague, a sort of lofty meta-principle. They are often stated in terminology which is never clearly defined. Then the ostensibly logical consequence of such a bland repurpose, is to justify the use of the wokist’s desired end policies. In essence, it’s used as cover to sneak their desired agenda under the radar, including but not limited to mandatory vaxxes.
Thus the author is still bamboozled, because there is one glaring fact which she fails to grasp. It is irrelevant that the government’s recommendations on vaccines were not really for the ‘community good’, that indeed the opposite was true. Instead, of primary importance was the change in context of the original law, subtly shifting it to encompass details which were never intended, which in fact were the inverse of those originally intended.
Have you ever heard wokist values referred to as “inverse” when applied to logic, or morality, or common sense, or business practices, or governmental practices, or anything else which is normal, standard, traditional? Well this Fair Work Act 2009 situation is an example of the standard wokist tactic used to implement their inverse assault on reality, including everyone in it, namely you, me, and us. Once you are wise to it, you will start to see it everywhere. The wokists have successfully used this tactic repeatedly for each and every step in their agenda over the last 60 years. It’s long past time that people should have noticed it, especially supposedly smart people like the PhD who is author of this article. Because if you can’t even notice what your enemy is doing to you, you sure as hell will never be able to stop it. Duh….
Reply
Robert Beatty
| #
Hi Erik,
You have clearly analysed the leadership deficit problem we in Australia have developed over several years now. If there is any comfort to be taken from our situation it is that we are not alone. The same problem is being faced by most of the G7/8 countries.
The term “Wokists” is confusing to me. It used to be Marxism, Neo Marxist, or plain old socialism. To my mind it represents autocracy which is the most extreme form of Top-Down leadership.
So that is the problem, now what is the solution – apart from lying down and accepting our fate? My suggested peaceful solution is to promote a system of Bottom-Up government as outlined in the report https://bosmin.com/HOME/Bottom-UpGovernment.pdf
A more comprehensive discussion is in my book at https://bosmin.com/ICS/CIR-Australia.pdf which you will note in Chapter 20, calls for a panel of like minded citizens to study the subject.
Reply