Australian Federal Court to decide if Pfizer and Moderna broke the law

Written by Phillip Altman on October 10, 2023. Posted in Current News

80 percent of the Australian Population has been given COVID injections which should never have been approved for release

The COVID-19 gene-based synthetic mRNA so-called “vaccines” have been a failure.

It is widely recognised and admitted that these injections do not prevent infection or transmission of infection and they have been associated with the highest incidence of serious adverse events, ongoing disability and death of any therapeutic agent ever released.

The ongoing non-COVID all cause mortality around the world has skyrocketed since these injections were rolled out. In Australia alone, data suggests more than 30,000 Australian non-COVID deaths have been associated with the injections.

All data suggests the injections are to blame for the unexplained non-COVID deaths. Governments cannot provide a credible alternative explanation as to why this is happening and they even refuse to investigate.

Our drug regulator, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), waived the normal requirements for proof of safety and we are all suffering because of this reckless approach to the release of these experimental gene-based injections which have never been used on such a massive scale and used in healthy people, children and pregnant women.

But were these COVID injections legally approved for release? That is a question that may soon be answered. AMPS has outlined the Federal Court case which has now been lodged.

You see, the COVID-19 “vaccines” produced by Pfizer and Moderna satisfy the Australian legal definition for being properly deemed Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), pursuant to Section 10 of the Gene technology Act 2000.

The Act defines an “Organism” as any biological entity that is: “viable; or capable of reproduction; or capable of transferring genetic material”.

The lipid nanoparticle modified RNA or the lipid nanoparticle complex which encapsulates the modified RNA (“modified RNA” because it is not natural mRNA) fulfill the criteria as being “any biological entity” and the modified RNA is “genetic material”.

Also, the lipid nanoparticle modified RNA and the lipid nanoparticle complex containing the modified RNA clearly are “capable of transferring genetic material” throughout the body.

Furthermore, excessive synthetic DNA contamination in the injections (discovered by Dr. Kevin McKernan and confirmed by several other genomics experts), is also “capable of reproduction” in that it can self-replicate independently within human cells.

So, clearly the gene-based injections satisfy the definition of a GMO.

Now, it is a criminal “Offence” for a person to knowingly “deal” with a GMO (like the TGA) without a licence because of the risk to life. It is alleged that both Pfizer and Moderna avoided their legal obligation to properly seek a GMO Licence from the Office of Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) which is the Australian legal entity responsible for the issuance of such licences.

This is serious business because it is now known that the COVID-19 injections contain synthetic modified genetic material which can enter the nucleus of cells and potentially integrate irreversibly into a person’s DNA and this altered DNA could be passed on to future generations.

In addition, it has now been shown that the COVID-19 injections contain massive amounts of dangerous plasmid DNA derived from the manufacturing process (Process 2, CLICK HERE to see my Substack of 5 Oct.) which was not present in clinical trial batches which utilised a cleaner manufacturing process based on real-time PCR manufacture.

There is also a strong suspicion that the commercial batches of the injections manufactured using Process 2 also contain dangerous endotoxins (I refer my readers to Dr. Geoff Pain’s Substack posts).

It could reasonably be assumed that Pfizer and Moderna were aware of these dangers prior to application to market these injections and did not adequately advise the OGTR or the TGA.

The Australian public was also not made aware of these dangers and senior public health “experts” declared the injections “safe” without any qualification. Health professionals who administered the injections also failed to properly provide informed consent under both international and national guidelines (CLICK HERE to see my Substack of 20 Sept).

To his enormous credit, Senator Gerard Rennick has written to the Attorney General to bring to his attention the need to act quickly.

Where will this lead? I will leave that to the legal eagles amongst us. But what can be said is that our drug regulatory system has failed to inform and protect us from harm. There continues to be a veil of secrecy surrounding the nature of the COVID-19 injections including their real nature and potential harm.

This is why a Royal Commission is so necessary. This is why Big Pharma indemnity from prosecution for harm caused by “vaccines” must be abolished. We must understand how the system failed us so we avoid any repetition of this tragic saga.

I wish to acknowledge the excellent work of many lawyers in this Federal case including Julian Gillespie, Katie Ashby-Koppens and Peter Fam to diligently research this very complicated biomolecular field of drug development as it applies to drug regulatory affairs.

See more here substack.com

Header image: orfonline.org

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.