Aussie Police decline to investigate suspicious activities of Politicians
Let’s be clear about this. Police do not work for the Government, and must never be political enforcers
Police work for the Crown, to protect the lives and property of Queenslanders.
Dear Detective Inspector Leadbetter
I received your letter in mid-March and it has sat on my desk begging for my attention only to be interrupted by the floods which forced us to evacuate the house and then return to a massive cleanup.
But, in truth, the delay was really caused by the fact that I didn’t know how best to respond.
As a credible informant and respected member of the community, and as someone who has received formal military training in biological warfare in the UK, I have brought to your attention my well-founded suspicion that there have been serious crimes committed upon the citizens of Queensland by the Government of Queensland, its public servants and possibly contractors providing advice to the Government.
In response to that, you have advised me, by way of your letter (a scanned copy of which is attached), of your inability to investigate these suspicions. I find this unacceptable. As a policeman, you have sworn to protect and serve the pubic without fear or favour, selfishness or sloth.
By declining to pursue this matter, you are failing to honour that oath which you have solemnly sworn.
Let me provide you with the most pertinent facts of this matter for your consideration: Is this disease, COVID-19, exceptionally deadly such that it demands extreme action by the Government in terms of curtailing civil liberties and coercing people, like yourself, to submit to a potentially dangerous medical procedure?
The answer to this question is an unequivocal, “No”.
Here is a table, constructed by medical professionals and a statistician, which shows the probability, by age cohort, of a person dying from COVID-19. The Case Fatality Rate(CFR) is a metric that indicates the likelihood of a confirmed case dying directly as a result of this disease.
It is expressed as a percentage. To become a “case”, one has to seek medical attention from a doctor.
The Infection Fatality Rate(IFR) is a metric indicating the likelihood of a person who contracts the disease dying directly as a consequence of it. Once again this is expressed as a percentage.
With respect to calculating the IFR, random serology tests have established that over 80 percent of people who contract this disease will not become sufficiently ill to cause them to go to a doctor and therefore they will not be counted as “a case”.
This is particularly so with young fit persons. Conversely, it is likely that most aged people will become so ill they will have to seek medical attention. As a consequence, for the median age, the IFR percentage is around five times less than the CFR.
To instill fear and panic in the public the CFR% has often been quoted by Government and the media when, in fact, this disease is only truly lethal to a small portion of the total population with the majority of those dying already having a range of life-threatening medical conditions.
The average age of males dying from this disease is around 82 years of age whilst for females it is around 86 years of age.
By way of example, using this table, if you are in the age-group 40 to 49, your probability of dying (ie, the Infection Fatality Rate) from COVID-19 Alpha is approx 9 in 10,000 without early treatment and approx 1 in 10,000 if early treatment is provided.
For the Delta strain, the probability of dying from this disease for the same age cohort is 2 in 10,000 and 4 in 100,000 respectively. For young persons the chances of dying from this disease is many times less than that of being struck by lightning during their lifetime.
Any person who dies from this disease is most likely to be suffering from other lifethreatening medical ailments.
This means that this disease is not as dangerous as a severe influenza and significantly less dangerous than influenza if early treatment is administered.
Which brings us to the question:
“Why did the Queensland Government obstruct early treatment and threaten doctors with a heavy fine and prison sentence if they attempted to administer it?”
If early treatment is effective in preventing hospitalisation and death (and it definitely is) then those persons, from the Premier of Queensland down, who played a role in preventing well-known and successful treatments, are complicit in having caused the unnecessary deaths of many Queenslanders.
Put simply, those involved are provably guilty of causing specifically identifiable deaths by withholding proven treatments.
As a policeman, you should methodically seek out the facts and meticulously gather evidence. If you find from your enquiries that early treatment saves lives then you have to determine the reasons for which it was denied Queenslanders.
If that reason was motivated by profit or other inducements, those persons who were involved in this are guilty of premeditated murder. If it was due to ignorance, they are guilty of negligent manslaughter because it was well known doctors in other countries were taking effective action denied to infected Queenslanders.
It is your duty to ascertain which is the case and it is equally your duty to the citizens of Queensland, particularly the victims, to ensure that those responsible are brought to justice.
We now move onto the matter of vaccines and mandating that persons involved in the health industry in Queensland and government services, such as the police, must submit to these injections.
As at the time of writing, many thousands of people, globally, are suspected of having died from the administration of these Anti COVID Injections (ACIs) and many, many more have sustained life-long injuries.
If you have undergone a series of ACIs, it is highly probable you have sustained vascular, immunological and neurological injury. The more injections you have, the greater is the chance of permanent harm or death.
You should consider your own health to be at risk when weighing up the evidence.
Regarding the safety of these ACIs, even to the casual observer there were and still are many “red flags” that should have raised suspicions and concern in the mind of any responsible manager.
The data being used to determine whether these vaccines are safe and effective was compiled by the manufacturers of the product, not by an independent authority.
The manufacturers will not take liability for their products but have and will make billions of dollars in profit through their sale. The persons advising the Government have a close relationship, particularly with regard to funding, to the vaccine industry.
They, too, are far from being independent. These close and tangled relationships even exist within the Queensland Government at its highest levels.
Your Commissioner, by mandating that all police officers had no choice but to submit to these injections, has failed in her duty of care. She is obligated to first determine the threat of the disease and then the danger that the medical treatment might present and, balancing these two, decide on the correct course of action.
As shown, the disease is no worse and, in fact, is far less dangerous to young people, than influenza. On the other hand these injections are potentially far more dangerous and injurious than the disease they seek to protect people against.
Having failed in her duty of care, your Commissioner is guilty of reckless endangerment. Indeed, the whole senior management team of the Queensland Police Service is likely to be guilty of this offence.
It is your duty to ascertain if this is indeed the case and to what degree those involved in directing these mandates are guilty of endangering or harming their employees.
Given that meaningful disciplinary action is unlikely within the Government bureaucracy, those responsible should be charged and brought before the courts.
As I have indicated earlier, your position on this matter is unacceptable to me based on the facts and the reasons I have given. Now being again made aware of the facts, you have the choice of being on the right side of this matter or being complicit in its commission through your inaction.
The choice is yours to make. I urge you to be on the side of ethical policing and honour.
Sincerely
Kevin A. Loughrey, Lt Col (Ret’d) BE Mech(Hons), psc, jssc, Grad Dip Strategic Studies
See more here substack.com
Header image: Academic Accelerator
Bold emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
dave
| #
go get them Sir
Reply
Whokoo
| #
Politicians. Dangerous at any speed.
Reply