Astrophysicist Explains Climate Science Due Diligence
In this video I discuss the importance of performing due diligence upon the extraordinary claims of climate science. Due diligence means making sure that all of the t’s are crossed and all of the i’s are dotted, that all your ducks are lined in a row, so to speak.
That is: do all of the underlying elements of the claim form a valid logical chain from their initial premises out to their conclusion? And even if they do, is there any extant evidence which still refutes or is inconsistent with the claim?
This has been my approach to the extraordinary claims of climate science, and it results in a discovery and a conclusion even more extraordinary, but in this case, it is supported by evidence. We encounter an incredible and seemingly impossible paradox, a “rift in the space-time continuum”, of the human mind in the process of performing this due diligence, and examine its implications.
Have a great day expanding your mind by watching the video!
Reality is stranger than fiction, after-all.
More at climateofsophistry.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend the Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi PSI Readers, James McGinn, Howdy, and Herb
I come here to make a short comment because it is quite difficult to have a conversation. At Herbs article James McGinn commented (1/28/24 at 10:12pm) “Water is the Reason We Have Weather”. I cannot remember James ever stated this. And I cannot remember stating the following. Water vapor is the fuel for the atmospheric heat engines which cause atmospheric and precipitation is the exhaust of these engines where the engines are active. And these engines are known as short-lived thunder storms. Unless the jet streams carry the excess heat away from the top of these storms so they do not destroy themselves as an ordinary heat engine does if not cooled.
Have a good day
Reply
James McGinn
| #
Jerry:
At Herbs article James McGinn commented (1/28/24 at 10:12pm) “Water is the Reason We Have Weather”.
JMcG:
What you read there, Jerry, is the title of one of my podcasts. Following the title is a link to the podcast.
Jerry:
Water vapor is the fuel for the atmospheric heat engines . . .
JMcG:
Uh, no. Storms involve flow, not heat. The mechanism is vortices. The source of energy is differential pressure, higher pressure at the entrance of the vortice, lower pressure at the exit of the vortice, where it exhausts into the flow of the jet streams (thus explaining how jet streams maintain their momentum). Water (H2O) is the source of the structural properties of vortices. Specifically it is the surface tension properties of H2O which become amplified due to wind shear that is conserved along the inner sheath of the vortice as it interacts with the flow. Along these lines, vortices first emerge in the atmosphere as a result of moist/dry wind shear.
Jerry:
. . . which cause atmospheric and precipitation is the exhaust of these engines where the engines are active. And these engines are known as short-lived thunder storms.
JMcG:
Uplift, thunderstorms and rain are the result of vortice activity along the boundary between the troposphere and the stratosphere, about 7 miles above. Vortices require moist dry wind shear boundaries to grow. Sometimes boundary layers intersect the ground, allowing vortices to grow to the ground, causing a tornado. (This mostly occurs on the leeward side of mountain ranges, that disrupt the flow, allowing boundary layer to intersect the ground.)
This is my area of expertise. I’m literally the world’s number one expert on the physics of jet streams, physics of storms, and their interrelationship. Meteorologists refuse to discuss this subject in any detail because they are extremely confused and don’t want the public to know they are confused.
James McGinn / Genius
Don’t Be Fooled, Meteorology Doesn’t Really Have a Model of Storms
https://spotifyanchor-web.app.link/e/7kmjFE1qKGb
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi James,
Yesterday I watched a Championship football game and before the game a very arrogant, very skillful, young player was interviewed. By the end of the game this arrogant, inexperineced, knew his mistakes likely cost his TEAM the game and was very dejected about this and his older, more experienced were trying to consolidate (hope that is a proper word) him. For they knew they had been where he was. I make mistakes all the time and know that these mistakes must be corrected. The jet stream is driven by gravity ..The troposphere’s top is greatest in the tropics and it’s all down hill from there.
Have a good day
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi James,
“Meteorology Doesn’t Really Have a Model of Storms.” TRUE, because a valid model of a storm needs to be built upon (with) the data collected before, during, and after the storm. Data which is now available but seldom considered by you. At least I have not read that you have referred to this data.
Have a good day
Reply
VOWG
| #
And the planet is spinning, how fast?
Reply
Matthijs
| #
Joe,
Its not a flat line, its a point.
Cheers!
Reply