Are We Being Set Up for Mass Depopulation?
How do you market and implement a financial system that nobody would want if they understood its full ramifications โ a change so huge that it not only would mean the end of currency as we know it, but a total revision of sovereignty and individual rights?
In his view, which is part of the full-length documentary โPlanet Lockdown,โ1 Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a life science researcher and former vice-president and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer, reveals all on the COVID-19 pandemic, fast-tracked COVID-19 โvaccines,โ the issue of mutated virus variants and the need for booster shots, and how this manufactured crisis is being used to strip us of our civil liberties.
Are You Putting the Pieces Together?
Yeadon has a degree in biochemistry and toxicology and a research-based Ph.D. in respiratory pharmacology. Heโs spent 32 years of his career working for large pharmaceutical companies, and 10 years in the biotechnology sector.
โIโm in favor of all modes of new medical treatments, whether theyโre biologicals or vaccines, small molecules, creams, sprays, ointments, whatever, but Iโm fervently against unsafe medicines or medicines used in an inappropriate context,โ Yeadon says.
โSome of the things Iโm going to say are not favorable to the current crop of gene-based vaccines and itโs [because] theyโre being inappropriately used. I donโt think they have a sufficient safety profile to be used as a sort of wide-spectrum public health prophylactic โฆ
A few things have allowed me, I think, to spot whatโs going on in the world at the moment. One, Iโve loved biology since I was little. Iโve been continuing to learn and to apply biology broadly, whether itโs pharmacology, biochemistry, molecular biology [or] toxicology. Iโve got a very broad grounding in all things to do with life science, in terms of health and disease.
[Secondly], one of my former supervisors said that I had a remarkable facility that stood out above the sort of ordinary things youโd have to do to be a vice president or a CEO. He said I was able to spot patterns in sparse data earlier than my peers. So, when thereโs not enough data for most people to judge what was going on, I would often be able to see it.
I could see a pattern forming when there wasnโt quite enough information โฆ On this occasion, it allowed me, quite quickly, to work out that what we were being told about this virus and what we needed to do in order to stay safe was simply not true.โ
A Massive Fraud Has Been Perpetrated
Yeadon starts out by highlighting the โenormous changesโ made in the U.K.โs attribution of causes of deaths. If you die within 28 days of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, you are counted as a COVID-19 death, regardless of other underlying conditions. The same thing was done in the U.S. As noted by Yeadon:
โWeโve never had anything as absurd as the rule that is now used. Itโs not just a matter of disagreeing professionally. Itโs just complete nonsense.โ
The shutdown of businesses and forcing healthy people to self-isolate also makes no sense. Yeadon points out that only people who are ill, who have discernible symptoms of a respiratory infection, pose any health risk to others:
โTo be a good, efficient source of infection, you have to have a lot of virus. And if you have a lot of viruses attacking you, you are fighting back. That process produces symptoms, inevitably, not just occasionally. It must always happen โฆ
And those people are not people who are walking around in the community, because if youโre full of virus and symptomatic, you are also ill, and ill people tend to stay at home or in bed.โ
Asymptomatic spread, which has no sound basis, was used to justify lockdowns, which never had any basis in fact or science either. Lockdowns were implemented for entirely other reasons, namely to get you used to giving up your freedoms and your normal way of life, and to make you psychologically dependent on an outside source telling you when itโs OK to do what.
Itโs obedience training and a tool to get the population of the world to go along with the intentional decimation of the global economy and old way of life, thereby justifying the Great Reset, which is about transferring global wealth and ownership rights to the technocratic elite, and giving them the power to control the worldโs nations.
โBasically, everything your government has told you about this virus, everything you need to do to stay safe, is a lie,โ Yeadon says. โEvery part of it โฆ None of the key themes that you hear talked about โ from asymptomatic transmission to top-up vaccines [i.e., booster shots] โ not one of those things is supported by the scienceโ
โEvery piece is cleverly chosen adjacently to something that probably is true, but is itself a lie, and has led people to where we are right now. I donโt normally use phrases like this, but I think we are standing at the very gates of hell โฆ Itโs all about control โฆ
The reason Iโm commenting is because I believe itโs not just about my life. More importantly, [itโs the lives] of my children and grandchildren that are being stolen โฆ by a systematic process of fear and control thatโs going to culminate in, I think, some very horrible times, and Iโm desperate to wake you up โฆ
Weโre probably quite used to politicians occasionally telling white lies, and we kind of let them, but when they lie to you about something technical, something that you can check, and they do it [with] many, many elements of the whole event, then please, youโve got to believe me, [theyโre] not telling the truth.
And if theyโre not telling the truth, that means thereโs something else. And Iโm here to tell you that there is something very, very bad happening. If you donโt pay attention, you will soon lose any chance to do anything about it.โ
Science Has Been Turned on Its Head
Yeadon rightly notes that everything weโve known about virology and infectious disease has been turned upside down during this pandemic. None of the standard responses known to protect people from infectious disease was followed. Normally, you quarantine the sick to contain the infection.
Locking down entire societies has never been done and has no foundation in science or the history of epidemic control. Similarly, mass testing people without symptoms is without precedence. It simply isnโt done, and for good reason. Itโs a waste of resources because as Yeadon explained earlier, we know how viruses spread. This isnโt our first rodeo. Weโve dealt with infectious epidemics before.
We know how viruses work in the body. When you have an active infection, you develop symptoms as your body mounts its defense. Without symptoms, your viral load is too low to pose a threat, either to yourself or others. The myth about asymptomatic spread has been a fear tactic.
T-Cell Immunity Is Far More Important Than Antibodies
Yeadon goes on to review how weโve been misled about immunity and how your body fights off viruses. Youโve probably heard that the thing that gives you immunity against SARS-CoV-2 is SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies.
The entire vaccination campaign is built around the premise that by injecting a synthetic piece of viral RNA into your cells, your body will start producing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, in response to which your body will produce specific antibodies that recognize that protein. This is also known as humoral immunity.
However, while antibodies are important, especially in bacterial infections, antibodies are not the only part of your immunity. More importantly, immunity against viruses โ opposed to bacteria โ actually does not depend on antibodies. Yeadon explains:
โViruses are really tiny, and their business is to get as quickly as they can inside your cells. So, they bind to a receptor on the surface and inject themselves into your cell. So, theyโre inside. Antibodies are big molecules and theyโre generally outside your cells.
So just think about that for a moment. Antibodies and viruses are in separate compartments. The virus is inside the cell, the antibodies outside the cell. Iโm not saying antibodies have no role, but theyโre really not very important. This has been proven. There are some people in whom a natural experiment has occurred.
They have a defect and they actually donโt make antibodies, but theyโre able to fight off COVID-19, the virus SARS-CoV-2, quite well. The way they do that is, they have T-cell immunity, cellular immunity. [T-cells] are cells that are trained to detect virus-infected cells and to kill those cells. Thatโs how you defend yourself against a virus.
So, all of these mentions of antibody levels, itโs just bunk. It is not a good measure of whether or not youโre immune. It does give evidence that youโve been infected, but their persistence is not important as to whether youโve got immunity โฆ
Weโve known this for decades. Weโve known about T-cells for decades. They were clearly in my undergraduate textbooks. And weโve known about their importance in defending you against respiratory viruses since probably the 1970s, certainly the 1980s. So, donโt believe anything where people suggest to you that their role is uncertain. Weโve known for a very long time that they are absolutely central.โ
Antibodies Are Not the Answer to Variants
The central role of T-cell immunity, or cellular immunity, becomes particularly pertinent when discussing the threat of variants, mutated forms of SARS-CoV-2. As mentioned, your immune system is a multifaceted system that allows your body to mount defenses against all sorts of threats. Parasites, fungi, bacteria and viruses are the main threat categories.
Each of these invades and threatens you in completely different ways, and your immune system has ways of dealing with all of them, using a variety of mechanisms.
โYouโve got four or five different arms of the immune system: innate immunity, mucosal, antibody, T-cells and compliment[ary systems],โ Yeadon says.
โThere are all of these different wonderful systems that have integrated, one with another, because it needs to defend you against all sorts of different threats in the environment. What Iโm telling you is that the emphasis on antibodies in respect of respiratory viral infections is wrong, and you can establish that quite easily by doing some searching.โ
In essence, what Yeadon is saying is that whether youโre going to be susceptible to variants has very little to do with whether or not you have antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, because antibodies are not your primary defense against viruses. Your T-cells are the ones doing the heavy lifting.
What this means then, is that getting booster shots for different variants is not going to help you. It will not solve the problem, because these shots do not strengthen your T-cell immunity.
Carefully Rethink Need for Booster Shots
Of all the lies weโve been told over the past year, the ones that worry and frighten Yeadon the most are the lies about virus variants and booster shots. In fact, he believes not buying into these lies may be key to your very survival, and hereโs why:
โItโs quite normal for RNA viruses like SARS-CoV-2, when it replicates, to make typographical errors. Itโs got a very good error detection, error correction system so it doesnโt make too many typos, but it does make some, and those are called โvariants.โ
Itโs really important to know that if you find the variant thatโs most different from the sequence identified in Wuhan, that variance โฆ is only 0.3 percent different from the original sequence.
Iโll say it another way. If you find the most different variance, itโs 99.7percent identical to the original one, and I can assure you โฆ that amount of difference is absolutely NOT possibly able to represent itself to you as a different virus.โ
He explains how, earlier in the pandemic, scientists obtained blood from patients who had been sickened with the SARS virus 17 or 18 years ago. SARS-CoV-1, responsible for that SARS outbreak, is 80percent similar to SARS-CoV-2.
They wanted to know if the immune systems of these patients would be able to recognize SARS-CoV-2. They did. They still had memory T-cells against SARS-CoV-1, and those cells also recognized SARS-CoV-2, despite being only 80 percent similar. Now, if a 20percent difference was not enough to circumvent the immune system of these patients, why should you be concerned with a variant that is at most 0.3% different from the original SARS-CoV-2?
โWhen your government scientists tell you that a variant thatโs 0.3percent different from SARS-CoV-2 could masquerade as a new virus and be a threat to your health, you should know, and Iโm telling you, they are lying,โ Yeadon says.
โIf theyโre lying, and they are, why is the pharmaceutical industry making top-up [booster] vaccines? You should be terrified at this point, as I am, because thereโs absolutely no possible justification for their manufacture. And the worldโs medicines regulators have said, โBecause they are quite similar to the original vaccines โฆ we wonโt be asking them to do any clinical safety studies.โโ
Are We Seeing a Mass Depopulation Agenda in Action?
Yeadon stresses that variants simply arenโt different enough to represent a threat, which is why you donโt now, and wonโt in the future, need one or more booster shots. Yet theyโre already being made, and regulators are giving them a free pass when it comes to safety and efficacy studies.
โIโm very frightened of that. Thereโs no possible benign interpretation of this,โ Yeadon says. โI believe theyโre going to be used to damage your health and possibly kill you. Seriously. I can see no sensible interpretation other than a serious attempt at mass depopulationโ
โThis will provide the tools to do it, and plausible deniability. Theyโll create another story about some sort of biological threat and youโll line up and get your top-up vaccines, and a few months or a year or so later, youโll die of some peculiar inexplicable syndrome. And they wonโt be able to associate it with the vaccines.
Thatโs my belief โ that theyโre lying to you about variants so they can make damaging top-up vaccines that you donโt need at all. I think they will be used for malign purposes โฆ We know that the people [SARS-CoV-2] injures and kills are only people who are elderly and or ill, usually both, so weโre talking about less than 0.1percent[of the population] โฆ
Given that this virus represents, at worst, a slightly bigger risk to the old and ill than influenza, and a smaller risk [than influenza] to almost everyone else โฆ it was never necessary for us to have done anything. We didnโt need to do anything. [We didnโt need] lockdowns, masks, mass testing, vaccines.
There are multiple therapeutic drugs that are at least as effective as the vaccines are. Theyโre already available and cheap. Inhaled corticosteroids that are used in asthma reduced symptomatology by about 90percent.
An off-patent drug called ivermectin, one of the most widely-used drugs in the world, is also able to reduce symptoms at any stage of the disease, including lethality by about 90percent. So, you donโt need vaccines and you donโt need any of the measures that have been introduced at all.โ
Key Safety Concerns of mRNA โVaccinesโ
In December 2020, Yeadon filed a petition2 calling on the European Medicine Agency to halt Phase 3 clinical trials of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine until theyโve been restructured to address critical safety concerns. Of course, those trials were not halted. The four key safety concerns Yeadon specified in his petition3 were:
1. The potential for formation of non-neutralizing antibodies that can trigger an exaggerated immune reaction (referred to as paradoxical immune enhancement or antibody-dependent immune amplification) when the individual is exposed to the real โwildโ virus post-vaccination.
Antibody-dependent amplification has been repeatedly demonstrated in coronavirus vaccine trials on animals.4 While the animals initially tolerated the vaccine well and had robust immune responses, they later became severely ill or died when infected with the wild virus. Put plainly, the vaccine increased their susceptibility to the virus and made them more likely to die from the infection.
2. Pfizerโs mRNA vaccine contains polyethylene glycol (PEG), and studies have shown 70percent of people develop antibodies against this substance. This suggests PEG may trigger fatal allergic reactions in many who receive the vaccine.
Indeed, within days of the vaccineโs release, reports started coming in of people having life-threatening anaphylactic reactions,5 leading to warnings that people with known allergies should not take the Pfizer vaccine.6 Since then, anaphylactic reactions have been reported by recipients of the Moderna mRNA vaccine as well.7
3. The mRNA vaccine triggers your body to produce antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, and spike proteins in turn contain syncytin-homologous proteins that are essential for the formation of placenta. If a womanโs immune system starts reacting against syncytin-1, then there is the possibility she could become infertile.
This is an issue that none of the vaccine studies is looking at specifically. Mass vaccinating women of childbearing age against COVID-19 could potentially have the devastating consequence of causing mass infertility if the vaccine triggers an immune reaction against syncytin-1.
4. The studies are far too brief in duration to allow a realistic estimation of side effects. Depending on what those effects end up being, millions of people may be exposed to unacceptable risk in return for a very minor benefit.
Read the rest here: articles.mercola.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Brian James
| #
FEBRUARY 28, 2022 Eugenics and the Awakening of Sleeping Monsters
In this presentation delivered to the Day 6 proceedings of the Coronavirus Grand Jury hearing organized by Dr. Reiner Fullmich and his team of international lawyers, Canadian Patriot Review Editor-in-Chief Matthew Ehret was asked to deliver remarks elucidating the origins of the quasi-science of eugenics, and its role in mis-shaping the 20th century.
https://canadianpatriot.org/2022/02/28/eugenics-and-the-awakening-of-sleeping-monsters/
Feb 20, 2010 Innovating to zero! | Bill Gates
At TED2010, Bill Gates unveils his vision for the worldโs energy future, describing the need for โmiraclesโ to avoid planetary catastrophe and explaining why heโs backing a dramatically different type of nuclear reactor. The necessary goal? Zero carbon emissions globally by 2050.
https://youtu.be/JaF-fq2Zn7I
Reply
Wisenox
| #
These are all old articles that were posted before the site had a day of โmaintenanceโ on July 13.
There were multiple comments on most of the articles, but they have all been conveniently deleted.
Reply
Whokoo
| #
Not only has Andy managed to slow down time but he has reversed it as well. Inverted subatomic particle physics.
Reply
Andy Rowlands
| #
The vanishing articles was due to a cyber attack on us, and John has managed to save a few articles, but as you rightly say, the comments have not been saved.
Reply