Are Synthetic Food Dyes Really Harmful?
Synthetic food coloring enhances the visual appeal of foods, influencing consumer preferences by suggesting vitality, quality, and nutritional value
However, these artificial additives are solely designed to drive sales and provide no nutritional benefits.
The following FDA-approved dyes account for nearly all synthetic food dye exposure among the general U.S. population:
Batada et al found that nearly half (43.2 percent) of grocery store products contained artificial food colorings (AFCs), with Red 40 (29.8 percent), Blue 1 (24.2 percent), Yellow 5 (20.5 percent), and Yellow 6 (19.5 percent) being the most common.
Candies (96.3 percent), fruit-flavored snacks (94 percent), and drink mixes/powders (89.7 percent) had the highest prevalence of AFCs, while produce contained none.
Oliveira et al summarized the deleterious health effects linked to synthetic food colorings in children: neurobehavioral disorders, allergic reactions, carcinogenic and mutagenic potential, gastrointestinal and respiratory issues, toxicity, developmental and growth delays, and behavioral changes.
Sultana et al illustrated the specific health hazards associated with particular synthetic food dyes:
Miller et al conducted a systematic review of the potential neurobehavioral impacts (activity and attention) of food dye consumption.
They included 27 clinical trials of children exposed to synthetic food dyes and found that 16 of 25 challenge studies (64 percent) demonstrated evidence of a positive association, with 13 studies (52 percent) reporting statistically significant findings.
The authors concluded:
“Current evidence from studies in humans, largely from controlled exposure studies in children, supports a relationship between food dye exposure and adverse behavioral outcomes in children, both with and without pre-existing behavioral disorders.”
They also noted that:
Animal toxicology studies were used by FDA as the basis for regulatory risk assessments of food dyes [25]. All current dye registrations were made between 1969 and 1986 based on studies performed 35 to 50 years ago.
These studies were not designed to assess neurobehavioral endpoints. Dye registration was accompanied by derivation of an “acceptable daily intake” (ADI) based on these studies.
FDA ADIs have not been updated since original dye registration, although there have been several reviews of specific effects since then, the latest in 2011.
Synthetic food dyes, widely prevalent in U.S. products and lacking nutritional value, rely on outdated FDA approvals despite evidence of widespread toxicity, carcinogenicity, and adverse neurobehavioral effects, strongly warranting urgent regulatory action to protect public health.
Unfortunately, this won’t stop Big Food lobbyists from trying to prevent this much-needed food supply clean-up headed by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
If our federal government prioritized public health over profit, the decision to prohibit synthetic dyes would be an easy one.
See more here substack.com
Header image: Science Photo Library
Some italic emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Max DeLoaches
| #
It is obvious that the author has not heard of Methylene Blue a dye that has been used in the health field since the 1890’s. I’ve been using it for some time now for health benefits that have benefited ME.
Reply