Arctic Ice at Decade-High Level: Can Doomsayers Explain?
With ice coverage for July and August remaining above the 10-year average of 2010-20, the extent of summer sea ice in the Arctic has surprised experts who once predicted that such levels would be impossible.
This stands in stark contrast to the dominant climate narrative that predicts the dwindling of summer ice in the Arctic. Some politicians had even claimed that parts of the Arctic would be ice-free by now.
With the seasonal Arctic melt technically over, it is fair to conclude that the extent of ice in the summer of 2022 has been greater than the 10-year average. On most days in July and August, sea-ice levels were above the 10-year average and significantly more than the previous few years.
The Japanese National Institute of Polar Research provides a useful visualization in the graph below. This year’s Arctic sea ice — shown in red — is compared with the 10-year average and the levels of the previous few years, including that of 2012 when ice had reached its lowest of the period tracked.
Data of sea-ice extent in square kilometers in the Arctic Ocean from June 2002 to the present and decadal averages of 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s are included. Source: National Institute of Polar Research, https://ads.nipr.ac.jp/vishop/#/extent
According to the Danish Meteorological Institute, the extent of Arctic sea ice was much greater than the last five years as shown in the graph below:
Arctic Sea Ice Extent. Source: Danish Meteorological Institute, http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icecover.uk.php
Summer temperatures in the Arctic remained at levels similar to the 44-year average of 1958-2002, with no marked increase in warming. In the graph, temperature is shown in the Kelvin scale; the horizontal blue line is freezing, or zero degrees Celsius and 32 degrees Fahrenheit.
Daily mean temperature and climate north of the 80th northern parallel as a function of the day of year. Source: Danish Meteorological Institute, http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/meant80n.uk.php
Now, here’s the big question: Why were internationally acclaimed climate scientists unable to predict this marked increase in the extent of summer sea ice?
Is it because their overall approach is biased toward supporting the theory that carbon dioxide is warming the planet to dangerous levels?
Or is it because their models are incapable of predicting future temperatures?
The answers must come from the doomsayers themselves. They need to explain why Arctic summer temperatures have been no different from the 44-year average and why summer sea ice is above decadal averages.
Acknowledging that we are yet to understand the complex climate system will undermine the credibility of scientists and political institutions advancing destructive energy policies to address a fantasy of climate catastrophe.
Melting of Arctic ice has been used as a major data point in the justification of restrictive energy policies adopted by many countries.
It is ironic — and infuriating — that millions across the world are suffering from high energy prices and blackouts at the same time that Arctic sea ice has been at its greatest extent in five years!
Europe is facing rapidly rising electricity prices and a natural gas shortage. Citizens in the U.S. are experiencing high energy prices as their access to cheap fossil fuels is restricted by government’s infatuation with solar and wind power.
China is scampering to reduce blackouts. All this could have been avoided if political leaders had not promoted a false climate emergency.
It makes no sense to force people to live in darkness in the name of climate policy when the policy makers themselves have so little understanding of the planet’s mechanisms of warming and cooling.
Acknowledge the infancy of climate science and liberate people from energy tyranny.
See more here co2coalition.org
Bold emphasis added
About the author: Vijay Jayaraj is a Research Associate at the CO2 Coalition, Arlington, VA. He holds a master’s degree in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia, UK and resides in India.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Lorraine
| #
It’s about control. Freezing and starving people is a means to depopulate the globe.
Fewer people are easier to control..
Reply
Gary Ashe
| #
Of course it can be explained, its climate change silly.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Gary,
Of course, you know your comment is “SILLY”.
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
T. C. Clark
| #
Well, CO2 has increased about 25 ppm over the last 10 years…maybe that’s the reason – no wait, CO2 is supposed to cause warming. It is only about another week before ice starts to accumulate in the polar region for the winter.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Vijay and PSI Readers,
Vijay Jayaraj asks two questions just following the figure of data from (Daily mean temperature and climate north of the 80th northern parallel as a function of the day of year. Source: Danish Meteorological Institute, http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/meant80n.uk.php).
“Now, here’s the big question: Why were internationally acclaimed climate scientists unable to predict this marked increase in the extent of summer sea ice? Is it because their overall approach is biased toward supporting the theory that carbon dioxide is warming the planet to dangerous levels?”
My answer to the first question is that meteorologists are unable to predict clouds. The question Vijay should have asked: Why, at the beginning of 2022, were the temperatures so above NORMAL. And my answer to the second is because it seems most everyone ignores what R.C. Sutcliffe, a meteorologist, wrote in 1966 (‘Weather and Climate’): “Clouds which do not give rain, which never even threaten to give rain but which dissolve again into vapor before the precipitation stage is ever reached, have a profound effect on our climate.”
If one goes to (http://weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/sounding.html) and then to the ARTIC and then to 20046 Polargmo Im. Krenkelja Observations and inspect the sounding data for January 1, 2022 after clicking on “Include frost point calculations.”; the presence of clouds becomes obvious as do air temperatures above negative 10C. Now, one needs to do the same for several other years to convince oneself that this warm temperature at the beginning of a year is ABNORMAL as shown in the FIGURE.
But if one does not look at this data, which supports Sutcliffe’s comment about clouds and climate, how can one know this observed fact?
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply