AI Designs Computer Chips We Can’t Understand — But They Work Really Well
When chips are usually designed, scientists and engineers work with patterns and templates that are well-known.
A new study published in Nature Communications tried a different approach: a deep-learning-enabled design process for creating circuits and components.
Using artificial intelligence (AI), researchers at Princeton University and IIT Madras demonstrated an “inverse design” method, where you start from the desired properties and then make the design based on that.
The designs seem to work really well, but there’s a catch: no one really knows why they work so well.
“Humans cannot understand them, but they can work better,” said Kaushik Sengupta, the lead researcher, a professor of electrical and computer engineering at Princeton.
AI at the helm
The AI-driven method focused on designing wireless chips, which are extremely important for high-frequency applications like 5G networks, radar systems, and advanced sensing technologies.
These circuits power innovations in everything from radar systems to autonomous vehicles but their development is notoriously slow. Engineers would start on predefined templates and manually optimize or improve designs through iterative simulations and testing.
See more here zmescience.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Howdy
| #
Microsoft has windows, that doesn’t work very well, but M$ can’t understand that either.
“The designs seem to work really well, but there’s a catch: no one really knows why they work so well.”
And that does not seem precarious?
Reply
Tom
| #
By the time these clowns figure out how they work, we will be enslaved by them with no way out. Can you imagine some A/i retards controlling the grid, or a nuclear arsenal, or some other military devices or airports and traffic?
Reply