About Informed Vaccine Consent: Frank Shallenberger, MD, HMD
Dear Patients and Friends, I must have been asked 20 times about the new COVID vaccines. Here are my thoughts. Please pass this information onto many as you can. People need to have fully informed consent when it comes to injecting foreign genetic material into their bodies.
- The COVID vaccines are mRNA vaccines. mRNA vaccines are a completely new type of vaccine. No mRNA vaccine has ever been licensed for human use before. In essence, we have absolutely no idea what to expect from this vaccine. We have no idea if it will be effective or safe.
- Traditional vaccine simply introduce pieces of a virus to stimulate an immune reaction. The new mRNA vaccine is completely different. It actually injects (transfects) molecules of synthetic genetic material from non-humans sources into our cells. Once in the cells, the genetic material interacts with our transfer RNA (tRNA) to make a foreign protein that supposedly teaches the body to destroy the virus being coded for. Note that these newly created proteins are not regulated by our own DNA, and are thus completely foreign to our cells. What they are fully capable of doing is unknown.
- The mRNA molecule is vulnerable to destruction. So, in order to protect the fragile mRNA strands while they are being inserted into our DNA they are coated with PEGylated lipid nanoparticles. This coating hides the mRNA from our immune system which ordinarily would kill any foreign material injected into the body. PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been used in several different drugs for years. Because of their effect on immune system balance, several studies have shown them to induce allergies and autoimmune diseases. Additionally, PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been shown to trigger their own immune reactions, and to cause damage to the liver.
- These new vaccines are additionally contaminated with aluminum, mercury, and possibly formaldehyde. The manufacturers have not yet disclosed what other toxins they contain.
- Since viruses mutate frequently, the chance of any vaccine working for more than a year is unlikely. That is why the flu vaccine changes every year. Last year’s vaccine is no more valuable than last year’s newspaper.
- Absolutely no long term safety studies will have been done to ensure that any of these vaccines don’t cause the cancer, seizures, heart disease, allergies, and autoimmune diseases seen with other vaccines. If you ever wanted to be guinea pig for Big Pharma, now is your golden opportunity.
- Many experts question whether the mRNA technology is ready for prime time. In November 2020, Dr. Peter Jay Hotez said of the new mRNA vaccines, “I worry about innovation at the expense of practicality because they [the mRNA vaccines] are weighted toward technology platforms that have never made it to licensure before.” Dr. Hotez is Professor of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology & Microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine, where he is also Director of the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development.
- Michal Linial, PhD is a Professor of Biochemistry. Because of her research and forecasts on COVID-19, Dr. Linial has been widely quoted in the media. She recently stated, “I won’t be taking it [the mRNA vaccine] immediately – probably not for at least the coming year. We have to wait and see whether it really works. We will have a safety profile for only a certain number of months, so if there is a long-term effect after two years, we cannot know.”
- In November 2020, The Washington Post reported on hesitancy among healthcare professionals in the United States to the mRNA vaccines, citing surveys which reported that: “some did not want to be in the first round, so they could wait and see if there are potential side effects”, and that “doctors and nurses want more data before championing vaccines to end the pandemic”.
- Since the death rate from COVID resumed to the normal flu death rate way back in early September, the pandemic has been over since then. Therefore, at this point in time no vaccine is needed. The current scare tactics regarding “escalating cases” is based on a PCR test that because it exceeds 34 amplifications has a 100% false positive rate unless it is performed between the 3rd and 5th day after the first day of symptoms. It is therefor 100% inaccurate in people with no symptoms. This is well established in the scientific literature. See the attachment (False Positive PCR testing is up to 100%!) for more information on this. If you go to the CDC site (file:///C:/Users/docto/AppData/Local/Temp/cdc_97230_DS1.pdf ), you can see that the weekly death rates in the US are now lower than they normally are during an average flu season.
- The other reason you don’t need a vaccine for COVID-19 is that substantial herd immunity has already taken place in the United States. This is the primary reason for the end of the pandemic.
- Unfortunately, you cannot completely trust what you hear from the media. They have consistently got it wrong for the past year. Since they are all supported by Big Pharma and the other entities selling the COVID vaccines, they are not going to be fully forthcoming when it comes to mRNA vaccines. Every statement I have made here is fully backed by published scientific references.
- I would be very interested to see verification that Bill and Melinda Gates with their entire family including grandchildren, Joe Biden and President Trump and their entire families, and Anthony Fauci and his entire family all get the vaccine.
- Anyone who after reading all this still wants to get injected with the mRNA vaccine, should at the very least have their blood checked for COVID-19 antibodies. There is no need for a vaccine in persons already naturally immunized.
Here’s my bottom line:
I would much rather get a COVID infection than get a COVID vaccine. That would be safer and more effective. I have had a number of COVID positive flu cases this year. Some were old and had health concerns. Every single one has done really well with natural therapies including ozone therapy and IV vitamin C. Just because modern medicine has no effective treatment for viral infections, doesn’t mean that there isn’t one.
References
Garade, Damien (10 November 2020). “The story of mRNA: How a once-dismissed idea became a leading technology in the Covid vaccine race”. Stat. Retrieved 16 November 2020.
Cooney, Elizabeth (1 December 2020). “How nanotechnology helps mRNA Covid-19 vaccines work”. Stat. Retrieved 3 December 2020.
Verbeke, Rein; Lentacker, Ine; De Smedt, Stefaan C.; Dewitte, Heleen (October 2019). “Three decades of messenger RNA vaccine development”. Nano Today. 28: 100766. doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2019.100766.
Roberts, Joanna (1 June 2020). “Five things you need to know about: mRNA vaccines”. Horizon. Retrieved 16 November 2020.
PHG Foundation (2019). “RNA vaccines: an introduction”. University of Cambridge. Retrieved 18 November 2020.
Pardi, Norbert; Hogan, Michael J.; Porter, Frederick W.; Weissman, Drew (April 2018). “mRNA vaccines — a new era in vaccinology”. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 17 (4): 261–279. doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.243. PMC 5906799. PMID 29326426.
Kramps, Thomas; Elders, Knut (2017). “Introduction to RNA Vaccines”. RNA Vaccines: Methods and Protocols. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-6481-9_1. ISBN 978-1-4939-6479-6. Retrieved 18 November 2020.
Dogan, Ellie (25 November 2020). “COVID-19 vaccines poised for launch, but impact on pandemic unclear”. Nature. doi:10.1038/d41587-020-00022-y. Retrieved 30 November 2020.
“Seven vital questions about the RNA Covid-19 vaccines emerging from clinical trials”. Wellcome Trust. 19 November 2020. Retrieved 26 November 2020.
Jaffe-Hoffman, Maayan (17 November 2020). “Could mRNA COVID-19 vaccines be dangerous in the long-term?”. The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 17 November 2020.
Eugene Gu (21 May 2020). “This is the hard-to-swallow truth about a future coronavirus vaccine (and yes, I’m a doctor)”. The Independent. Retrieved 23 November 2020.
Rowland, Christopher (21 November 2020). “Doctors and nurses want more data before championing vaccines to end the pandemic”. Washington Post. Retrieved 22 November 2020.
Thomas, Katie (22 October 2020). “Experts Tell F.D.A. It Should Gather More Safety Data on Covid-19 Vaccines”. New York Times. Retrieved 21 November 2020.
Kuchler, Hannah (30 September 2020). “Pfizer boss warns on risk of fast-tracking vaccines”. Financial Times. Retrieved 21 November 2020.
Guarascio, Francesco (2 December 2020). “EU criticizes ‘hasty’ UK approval of COVID-19 vaccine”. Reuters. Retrieved 2 December 2020.
Berglund, Peter; Smerdou, Cristian; Fleeton, Marina N.; Tubulekas, Loannis; Liljeström, Peter (June 1998). “Enhancing immune responses using suicidal DNA vaccines”. Nature Biotechnology. 16 (6): 562–565. doi:10.1038/nbt0698-562. ISSN 1546-1696.
Garde, Damien (10 January 2017). “Lavishly funded Moderna hits safety problems in bold bid to revolutionize medicine”. Stat. Archived from the original on 16 November 2020. Retrieved 19 May 2020.
Jaffe-Hoffman, Maayan (1 December 2020). “Hadassah research head raises questions about mRNA vaccine safety”. The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
Doshi, Peter (26 November 2020). “Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective” vaccines—let’s be cautious and first see the full data”. British Medical Journal. Retrieved 3 December 2020.
Reichmuth, Andreas M; Oberli, Matthias A; Jaklenec, Ana; Langer, Robert; Blankschtein, Daniel (May 2016). “mRNA vaccine delivery using lipid nanoparticles”. Therapeutic Delivery. 7 (5): 319–334. doi:10.4155/tde-2016-0006. ISSN 2041-5990. PMC 5439223. PMID 27075952.
Wadman, Meridith (27 November 2020). “Public needs to prep for vaccine side effects”. Science. 370 (6520):
About the author: Frank Shallenberger, MD, HMD runs the Nevada Center of Alternative and Anti-Aging Medicine. Hehas been practicing medicine since 1973 and has been a pioneer in alternative/integrative medicine since 1978. He is one of only 16 physicians in Nevada that are licensed both in conventional medicine as well as alternative and homeopathic medicine. Read more at www.antiagingmedicine.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method
Trackback from your site.
mark tapley
| #
Fake virus, fake test , fake numbers and now the fake vaccine. Same Zionists that contrive the wars, did 911, WMD’s, all the fake shootings as in Boston bombing and Los Vegas, fake Floyd race baiting and staged riots have now also stolen trillions more using their buddies in the banking cartel as they did in 08. What could be the problem with them promoting another highly profitable vaccine fraud? All the livestock need to get in line to get their new enhanced back door immune bypass vaccine so they can be safe till time for the next fake virus falls out of the sky.
Reply
L S M
| #
All viruses mutate quickly, Vaccines are pointless against them.
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
Anyone stupid enough to take this so called “vacccine” should be living in Agenda 2030-21, and that is what is planned for all of the barnyard animals living in the Zionist controlled countries. They have been propagandizing the goyim for 30 years with the global warming fraud, first using Zionist Jew Armand Hammer’s flunky All Gore then the retarded looking teenager Greta. Not much traction but now they have hit the jack pot with the scamdemic.
Principia Scientific has already noted that in Jewmerica only 16% of what are diagnosed as the flu are upon analysis actually flu (any variety). Therefore even if there were a real covid 19, as with all flu cases very few people are impacted much less killed, unless they already have one foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel. Everything the governments (Zionist elite) do is a lie and a fraud. The goyim cucks never learn.
Reply
Don Rozar
| #
Your anti-Semitic rants simply make you look like a deranged Nazi wanna-be. Pathetic . . .
Reply
Surya WOHL
| #
Agreed. Stop the Anti-Semitism
Reply
CD Marshall
| #
Just came from a week in a hospital. No C19 going in and no C19 going out (thankfully). The staff overall are just confused and scared about the whole thing. They have 3 C19 floors and mandated work on those floors.
My wife’s side of the family had three cases, all recovered including one with a heart condition.
Reply
Dev
| #
“The new mRNA vaccine is completely different. It actually injects (transfects) molecules of synthetic genetic material from non-humans sources into our cells. Once in the cells, the genetic material interacts with our transfer RNA (tRNA) to make a foreign protein that supposedly teaches the body to destroy the virus being coded for. Note that these newly created proteins are not regulated by our own DNA, and are thus completely foreign to our cells. What they are fully capable of doing is unknown.”
If pathogenic virus hypothesis is a myth and the particles classified as viruses are in fact exosomes generated by our own cells in response to some insult, toxic or otherwise then the vaccine will in fact then be targeting our bodies as if it is the “virus”.
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
Absolutely, The spike proteins that the mRNA vaccine is supposed to emulate and create in our cells are very homologous to similar human proteins, particularly those on exosomes which are part of our bodies defenses against toxins.
Reply
Christian Loosli
| #
And that’s exactly as Bill Gates sees humanity that belong not to the chosen poeple of Jawhe, as Viruses that need to be reduced as described in the Georgia guidestone. When you dig a bit it’s curious how many of this elite are or claime descendant off this special poeple. The babilonien Talmud is quite clear about it, what they are alloued to do with us without offending their father which is a lyer from the beginning as Jesus put it in Matt. 23. It’s really a spiritual battle which can only won in the spirital realm first. Thanks so much!
Reply
Wendy
| #
Silybum marianum, Cnicus benedictus, Onopordum acanthium, if you have to get through a Sars-Cov-2 infection with serum cholesterol of 10.9 like I had to.
Reply
Zack
| #
Great article!
Reply
Nawaz ahmed
| #
Does anyone know what the non human substance is and where it is from ie which animal . Where does this mrna come from and what is the full make up of the Covd-19 vaccine which was fastracked suspiciously.
Reply
Hudson H Luce
| #
Chimpanzee adenovirus is the basis for some of the new vaccines – https://cen.acs.org/pharmaceuticals/vaccines/Adenoviral-vectors-new-COVID-19/98/i19 – but the mRNA vaccines mentioned in the article appear to be entirely synthetic – https://cen.acs.org/pharmaceuticals/vaccines/coronavirus-help-mRNA-DNA-vaccines/98/i14
Reply
Eric
| #
Good article & especially good info on PCR. Everyone on earth who cares to do 3 min of research should know this by now. However, I could not find the CDC report he mentioned about the weekly death rates, neither in his references or copy/ paste/ search.
Reply
Jon the pharmacist
| #
The COVID vaccines are mRNA vaccines. mRNA vaccines are a completely new type of vaccine.
No mRNA vaccine has ever been licensed for human use before.
In essence, we have absolutely no idea what to expect from this vaccine.
We have no idea if it will be effective or safe.
RESPONSE: mRNA vaccines are newly approved, but the tech has been in development for about 17 years with data supporting safety.
This is what clinical trials are for. Clinical trials are specifically designed to establish safety and efficacy. The COVID vaccines have been held to this same process and it is because of this strict FDA standard that the approval took as long as it did despite the insistence by the current president that it be overlooked. As a homeopath, this author might not be aware of this because most medicines used in homeopathy are not FDA approved and are classified as natural remedies. Hypocritical that the vaccine must meet a standard that his recommended treatments for COVID infection do not.
Traditional vaccine simply introduce pieces of a virus to stimulate an immune reaction.
The new mRNA vaccine is completely different. It actually injects (transfects) molecules of synthetic genetic material from non-humans sources into our cells.
Once in the cells, the genetic material interacts with our transfer RNA (tRNA) to make a foreign protein that supposedly teaches the body to destroy the virus being coded for.
Note that these newly created proteins are not regulated by our own DNA, and are thus completely foreign to our cells.
What they are fully capable of doing is unknown.
RESPONSE: Again, in clinical trials there has not yet been an indication that the proteins produced by the mRNA vaccine are dangerous. “What they are fully capable of” is reducing the risk of COVID infection dramatically. It is known.
The mRNA molecule is vulnerable to destruction.
So, in order to protect the fragile mRNA strands while they are being inserted into our DNA they are coated with PEGylated lipid nanoparticles.
This coating hides the mRNA from our immune system which ordinarily would kill any foreign material injected into the body.
PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been used in several different drugs for years.
Because of their effect on immune system balance, several studies have shown them to induce allergies and autoimmune diseases.
Additionally, PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been shown to trigger their own immune reactions, and to cause damage to the liver.
RESPONSE: There is some truth to this. PEG lipid nanoparticles can cause immune reactions in rare cases. It is surprising considering the common occurrence of natural lipid bilayers, but again the cases are rare and seen in about 1 in 1.4 million cases.
These new vaccines are additionally contaminated with aluminum, mercury, and possibly formaldehyde.
The manufacturers have not yet disclosed what other toxins they contain.
RESPONSE: False according to the manufacturer. None of the above are listed, but ingredients can be found in the Pfizer vaccine package insert here: https://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=4559 or an article (missing citation, so be wary) at USA today here: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/12/12/pfizer-covid-vaccine-ingredient-list-nothing-too-surprising-there/6520511002/ .
But say you are wondering why some vaccines do include the “toxins” listed above, see this by the FDA explaining why: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availability-biologics/common-ingredients-us-licensed-vaccines
Since viruses mutate frequently, the chance of any vaccine working for more than a year is unlikely.
That is why the flu vaccine changes every year.
Last year’s vaccine is no more valuable than last year’s newspaper.
RESPONSE: This is a false comparison in that the flu virus mutation rate is unrelated to COVID, but it is possible that the COVID virus can mutate and vaccinations for both flu and COVID will become regular requirements, but it is too early to say how often.
Absolutely no long term safety studies will have been done to ensure that any of these vaccines don’t cause the cancer, seizures, heart disease, allergies, and autoimmune diseases seen with other vaccines.
If you ever wanted to be guinea pig for Big Pharma, now is your golden opportunity.
RESPONSE: This is true. There are no long term studies on mRNA vaccines in humans. Will it cause cancer? Will it cause seizure disorders? Will it make your testicles fall off? Maybe. Will it likely prevent you from becoming infected with the corona virus? Likely.
Many experts question whether the mRNA technology is ready for prime time.
In November 2020, Dr. Peter Jay Hotez said of the new mRNA vaccines, “I worry about innovation at the expense of practicality because they [the mRNA vaccines] are weighted toward technology platforms that have never made it to licensure before.”
Dr. Hotez is Professor of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology & Microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine, where he is also Director of the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development.
RESPONSE: This is slightly taken out of context. Dr Peter Jay Hotez did make the above statement. But the author does not mention that Dr. Hotez also said, “One of the questions that I’m asked all the time is, ‘Hey, doc, which vaccine are you waiting for?’ And the answer is … I’m going to take any of those vaccines that’s made available to me that’s authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration,” he says. “Don’t overthink it. Don’t wait. Get what vaccine you can.” See the article here: https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/11/24/938375308/vaccine-expert-once-a-covid-vaccine-is-available-dont-overthink-it-dont-wait
Michal Linial, PhD is a Professor of Biochemistry.
Because of her research and forecasts on COVID-19, Dr. Linial has been widely quoted in the media.
She recently stated, “I won’t be taking it [the mRNA vaccine] immediately – probably not for at least the coming year.
We have to wait and see whether it really works. We will have a safety profile for only a certain number of months, so if there is a long-term effect after two years, we cannot know.”
RESPONSE: More or less, this is true. This scientist did make this statement.
In November 2020, The Washington Post reported on hesitancy among healthcare professionals in the United States to the mRNA vaccines, citing surveys which reported that: “some did not want to be in the first round, so they could wait and see if there are potential side effects”, and that “doctors and nurses want more data before championing vaccines to end the pandemic”.
RESPONSE: Again, slightly out of context, but there is truth in the above statement. See the article here: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/doctors-and-nurses-want-more-data-before-championing-vaccines-to-end-the-pandemic/ar-BB1becTK?fbclid=IwAR0vzeFURg6zy_Zl0EzkUtaH1zGIW_c22MTl3x-X6yj0OMHNNJY0NSOB-uc .
Since the death rate from COVID resumed to the normal flu death rate way back in early September, the pandemic has been over since then.
Therefore, at this point in time no vaccine is needed.
The current scare tactics regarding “escalating cases” is based on a PCR test that because it exceeds 34 amplifications has a 100% false positive rate unless it is performed between the 3rd and 5th day after the first day of symptoms.
It is therefor 100% inaccurate in people with no symptoms.
This is well established in the scientific literature. See the attachment (False Positive PCR testing is up to 100%!) for more information on this.
If you go to the CDC site (file:///C:/Users/docto/AppData/Local/Temp/cdc_97230_DS1.pdf ), you can see that the weekly death rates in the US are now lower than they normally are during an average flu season.
RESPONSE: False. The death rate has NOT resumed to normal. Compared to typical years, as of October 2020, there were 299,000 more deaths than expected where 216,025 were associated with COVID. See the CDC article here: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6942e2.htm?s_cid=mm6942e2_w
The other reason you don’t need a vaccine for COVID-19 is that substantial herd immunity has already taken place in the United States.
This is the primary reason for the end of the pandemic.
RESPONSE: False. He doesn’t provide citation for this claim.
Unfortunately, you cannot completely trust what you hear from the media.
They have consistently got it wrong for the past year.
Since they are all supported by Big Pharma and the other entities selling the COVID vaccines, they are not going to be fully forthcoming when it comes to mRNA vaccines.
Every statement I have made here is fully backed by published scientific references.
RESPONSE: False and opinion. The author did not provide properly cited or relevant references for the statements in this article or this claim.
I would be very interested to see verification that Bill and Melinda Gates with their entire family including grandchildren, Joe Biden and President Trump and their entire families, and Anthony Fauci and his entire family all get the vaccine.
Ugh
Anyone who after reading all this still wants to get injected with the mRNA vaccine, should at the very least have their blood checked for COVID-19 antibodies.
There is no need for a vaccine in persons already naturally immunized.
Here’s my bottom line: I would much rather get a COVID infection than get a COVID vaccine.
That would be safer and more effective.
I have had a number of COVID positive flu cases this year.
Some were old and had health concerns.
Every single one has done really well with natural therapies including ozone therapy and IV vitamin C.
Just because modern medicine has no effective treatment for viral infections, doesn’t mean that there isn’t one.
RESPONSE: Actually, there is some clinical data and a couple of case studies showing that ozone therapy might help with COVID infected patients. But if your health decisions are swayed by clinical data, there is far more evidence that the COVID vaccine will prevent infection.
Reply
Patty
| #
THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU for doing this! There are many medical professionals (mostly nurses) in my life. I know how exhausted all of you as you treat patients in the middle of a storm of criminally negligent misinformation and widespread denial.
My mother just sent me this dangerously misleading article via a FB post share from someone who copied the content, but didn’t link the actual article. It took me quite a while to find it and, JOY, it comes with a medical professional debunking it in the comments. This is so helpful for writing my own point-by-point rebuttal, some of my points are the exact same points you make, only you word them better.
Before anyone comments I can’t verify the credibility of “John The Pharmacist”, I’m well aware I can’t verify JTP is actually a pharmacist. However, I was a medical transcriptionist for 15 years and he certainly writes like a medical professional who is trying to make things understandable to those reading this article (i.e. dumbing it down). I will take the information given here, look it up, and will trust it 1000x before I trust the word of Frank Shallenberger; a man who has literally killed a patient with his gross negligence and has been repeatedly reprimanded for misconduct and malpractice. I can verify Frank is a quack.
Reply
Dan Paulson
| #
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/97230/cdc_97230_DS1.pdf
Reply
kevin
| #
I find this article very concerning. I came across this as a person linked to it on Facebook as justification for not getting the vaccine. There are serious issues with this article that should be known, so I’m copying and pasting my response that I wrote of Facebook. I hope you’ll take this into consideration and use in forming your opinion.
I just looked at the link that you included. I read the article again, and read all of the references listed at the foot of the article as well. When a scientist cites sources for their claims, the sources should contain the data, concepts, and ideas used to form those claims. These sources should also come from primary literature–peer-reviewed material from journal articles, etc. I was unable to find information to back the claims of the assertions made except for points 2,3,6,7, and 9. That means that 9 of the 14 assertions made have no foundation given, and must be interpreted as mere conjecture of the author. Additionally for the points which are actually referenced in the sources listed, most are taken out of context and do not reflect the message of the article. For instance, the article cited for point #8 goes on to explain the position of the doctor mentioned: “Linial said she believes that the reason no mRNA vaccine has been developed yet is because there was just no need to move this fast on a vaccine until COVID-19 came along. She noted that most of the vaccines people take today were developed decades ago.
She said her concerns have less to do with the use of mRNA and more to do with the long-term efficacy of the vaccine, as well as other challenges that could cause something to go wrong and lead people to believe they are vaccinated when they are not.”
–Also important, the sources listed by Mr. Shallenberger come almost completely from media outlets, many of which would be considered “mainstream” such as the New York Times and the Washington Post. This is considered inadequate to support the claims made of this nature.
–Based on a somewhat objective look at this article and the sources used to back the claims, I see little reason to give any weight to the claims of the author, and if this article were the basis for doubting whether to vaccinate oneself, no compelling reason to fear getting the vaccine.
Reply
Finn McCool
| #
Don’t you just love the 77th Brigade!
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
Finn, Nice spot! Thanks!
Reply
Patty
| #
I would find the hypocrisy of this man, who literally killed a patient with gross negligence and use of a treatment that still hasn’t been proven in experiments, hilarious if I didn’t believe this article is going to increase the risk of contracting covid19 for anyone who takes this as fact and anyone unfortunate enough to be in their transmission path.
How dare you Frank Shallenberger?! You, of all people, have no right to use how much testing has or hasn’t been done as an argument against a new medical option that has actually been proven in experimentation before being rolled out to the public.
Reply
Patty
| #
I would find the hypocrisy of this man, who literally killed a patient with gross negligence and use of a treatment that still hasn’t been proven in experiments, hilarious if I didn’t believe this article is going to increase the risk of contracting covid19 for anyone who takes this as fact and anyone unfortunate enough to be in their transmission path.
How dare you Frank Shallenberger?! You, of all people, have no right to use how much testing has or hasn’t been done as an argument against a new medical option that has actually been proven in experimentation before being rolled out to the public.
Reply
Star
| #
Thank you to those commenters that push critical thinking skills. Needed now more than ever.
Reply
Dorothy J Maher
| #
GOD BLESS YOU!
Thank you SO MUCH…
I was married to a VERY unscrupulous MD PhD who worked for Merck and then formed his own company to get poisons and dangerous medical devices approved by FDA…
I hope people wake up soon…
The ATTROCITIES I saw really were ALMOST unbelievable….
On top of that ..the PAYOLA…dear GOD..
SO many people have RIDICULOUS faith any any fool in a white coat..
It cost me a lot to get him out my life…it almost cost me my life when I had him and an associate investigated….
But it was worth it…
I have spent my life since trying to wake people up…
I hope they do SOMEDAY..
Reply