Meta-Analysis Finds No Evidence ‘Vaccines’ Stopped Covid
Virtually every vaccinated person I meet has contracted COVID-19. Many still believe vaccination was worth the risk because they did not end up in the hospital in 2021 through the present day
Vaccine-takers tended to be younger working age individuals who were mandated by work or school, and therefore healthier than those not forced into taking the jab.
In my practice, the senior citizens who took the vaccine tended to be healthier and far more worried about COVID-19. They were the first to get early treatment for the illness.
Finally, we all saw COVID-19 illness become far milder on the second, third, and fourth infections because of natural immunity as we were faced with milder strains.
So in the midst of this confounded set of relationships, how did the COVID-19 vaccines perform?
Wu et al, published a meta-analysis of 68 studies evaluating efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination. Keep in mind only favorable studies were accepted by editors. The results indicate a stunning failure of vaccination.
Because the data are not from high-quality, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials, and publication bias, we must be conservative and consider the lower-bound of the confidence interval as the statistic of interest.
This means that vaccine performance could be as bad as that number.
As you can see, most lower bounds are near or below zero at 168-195 days! That means just a few months after the shot, there is no detectable benefit even in the most biased studies.
Hospitalization and death as an outcome must be considerably discounted since there was not control for early treatment, natural immunity, and progressively milder strains before Omicron.
After Omicron, there is no benefit whatsoever for vaccination for the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 or hospitalization/death.
See more here substack.com
About the author: Dr. McCullough is a practicing internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist in Dallas, Texas. He studies the cardiovascular complications of both the viral infection and the injuries developed from COVID vaccines. He has dozens of peer-reviewed publications on COVID, multiple U.S. and state Senate testimonies, and has commented extensively on the medical response to the COVID crisis on major media outlets.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
VOWG
| #
Golly, I wonder how many of us knew that from day one?
Reply
Itsme
| #
well I never…..
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
“Finally, we all saw COVID-19 illness become far milder on the second, third, and fourth infections because of natural immunity as we were faced with milder strains.”
Such viruses become milder over time as they adapt (evolve) to be more contagious and less virulent. Colds and flu.
The PCR test was designed using common cold and flu sequences (admitted by Fauci and the CDC) and never meant to detect a virus (C-19) that has never been isolated. This is why the PCR test is totally bogus and not worth anything. Using a false test to decide you are sick, often with no symptoms, is stupid. The virus carriers with no symptoms are also are rare and they are trying to claim millions of people, not sick, are carriers. Suddenly, Typhoid Mary is a common thing, NOT. This is all gaslighting of the public.
Reply
Ronert
| #
Why do they not prove that viruses evolve? Because they can not prove they even exist in the first place. Evolve is a useless term to describe something and I find its use is usually used to support a false interpretation or explanation of something that has happened or is occurring when another word would be better. Why is it used so much I do not know. Perhaps it is as a result of indoctrination.
Reply