Scientist Slams WSJ Article Promoting MBA’s ‘Pledge to Climate Action’

Written by John O'Sullivan, CEO, Principia Scientific International on April 22, 2024. Posted in Current News

A WSJ Article by Yusuf Khan showcasing a ‘pledge’ by future business leaders to “make a careerlong commitment to combat climate change” gets panned by a real scientist denouncing climate alarmism as a “monstrous lie.”

At Principia Scientific International we are dedicated to waking up to truth those brainwashed non scientists duped by mainstream media lies. As such we commend the corrective open letter of LtCol Kevin Loughrey and publish in full below.

[Please note Loughrey gave 32 years of military service and achieved a number of world firsts in engineering, software, chemistry and physics]

Dear Yusuf

I write to you regarding your article The Pledge That Is Getting Future Business Leaders to Commit to Climate Action you recently wrote concerning:

“At one of the world’s oldest universities, two M.B.A. candidates are trying to do something that has never been done before—get future business leaders to make a career-long commitment to combat climate change.

Collin Janich and Peter Golding, students at the University of Cambridge’s Judge Business School, are creating a pledge for M.B.A. candidates at the world’s top business schools to commit to championing sustainable initiatives and fighting for a net-zero future for the rest of their careers.

“Nothing exists challenging future business leaders,” Janich said. “We’re in a position to impact change so this is a call to action to transform business leadership and put climate change into business leadership.”

This article caused me to be gravely concerned and I felt compelled to write to you.

Please read the attached.

As someone who has studied thermodynamics to 4th year university level with honours, I assure you that neither Carbon Dioxide nor Methane nor Nitrous Oxide can appreciably warm the earth’s atmosphere.  In this I am in the good company of Professors Einstein, Angstrom, Carter, Happer, Rushbrook, Lindzen, Plimer, Soon … and the list goes on.  There never was a 97% agreement of so-called climate scientists.  That assertion was founded on fraud; the main actor in that being John Cook.

In actuality, all of the raw data I have seen, taken from weather stations that have not been encroached upon by urbanisation, indicate that from 1880 to the present day, the earth’s atmosphere has been in a gradual decline.  The graphs that show warming are the product of mixing real “adjusted” data with synthetic data generated by computer climate models; all of which have been shown to be hopelessly inaccurate.

Similarly data taken from two ice cores in Greenland show that, over the last 8,000 years, the earth’s atmospheric temperature has been in gradual decline whilst the concentration of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere was steadily increasing.

Data taken from satellite (a fairly recent innovation) has such a wide margin of error, thanks to their erratic operation, that no trend with any confidence can be determined. As it is, the measurement of temperature alone, in the absence of velocity, pressure and specific heat, at altitude does not take into account the true total enthalpy extant in that cell of atmosphere.

There is no “climate emergency”.  We should be worried about the possible onset of cooling rather than warming because cold kills a lot more people than does heat.

George Carlin once famously said, “There is no need for a conspiracy when there are convergent agendas.”  The end beneficiary of the Climate Change hoax is the Chinese Communist Party which has, as its stated objective, to be the supreme power of the world by 2049, the 100th anniversary of when the Communist seized power in China.

Cheap, reliable, abundant energy is the foundation-stone of every prosperous economy.  In all of the Western economies that have embraced wind and solar generation systems, energy cost has risen sharply and, with that rise, there has been a fall in the prosperity of those countries that are affected.

Those persons, possibly well-intentioned, promoting the fallacy of Anthropogenic Global Warming, now renamed to Climate Change, are helping wicked and evil people achieve their objectives.  

I conclude the attached paper by saying: “If we fail to do this[debunk this fraud], the future for our children, grandchildren and their successors looks extremely
bleak.”

I hope you will help us, the global scientific community with which I have the privilege to be associated, to promulgate the fact that “Climate Change” is a monstrous lie.  Every nation in this world should not worry about how much Carbon Dioxide is emitted when generating power (in all its forms) but instead concentrate on making energy as cheap, abundant and reliable as is humanly possible.  That is the path to a better more equitable world.

With best wishes

Kevin Loughrey

About LtCol Kevin Loughrey:

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.