Epidemiologist Could See Straight Away Covid Was Being Over-Hyped
It was an evening in mid-March 2020. Almost two years had passed since I retired from the University of Arizona, where I was a Professor of Epidemiology in the College of Public Health
I was watching the news from Israel, the country in which I lived during the first three decades of my life.
The reporters were broadcasting a forthcoming catastrophe, a doomsday in the making.
It was all about a new coronavirus epidemic which erupted in China and had reached Israel, Europe and parts of the U.S.
Like everyone, I have been following the news from the Far East since the beginning of the year. Although infectious diseases were not my subject matter research, epidemiologists are trained to think critically, to question what many accept at face value.
The picture that emerged was far from clear. A few observations did not fit well with the apocalyptic predictions.
So, I decided to write a short article in Hebrew and submit it as an op-ed to a newspaper in Israel. That’s how the series of essays now published as The Covid Pandemic: Unconventional Analytical Essays (2020-2023) started.
It was supposed to have ended about three years later with my summary of what has actually happened in Israel (as opposed to the official narrative), but I added a few more later articles on Covid vaccines.
In between, I wrote about many aspects of the pandemic, drawing upon data from Sweden, Denmark, Europe, Arizona, the US, the U.K. and Israel.
Forty essays are included in the book. The first one was titled ‘Hold off on that Apocalyptic Consensus About the Coronavirus’ (March 24th 2020). All of them were written for the public at large and were data driven.
They were not based on ‘opinion’ or ‘intuition’. They are science, as best as I know it. If written in a formal, academic style, many of these essays could have been submitted to epidemiology journals.
Whether they would have passed the guards of official narratives is a different question.
What will you find in the book?
Back in 2020, I devoted several essays to lockdown-free Sweden and showed, unequivocally, the futility of lockdowns and the misleading comparison of Sweden to neighbouring Nordic countries.
The last one in this series, published in 2022, was titled ‘Sweden or the World: Which was a Cautionary Tale?’, paraphrasing headlines that claimed the opposite in the spring of 2020.
Several essays have estimated the death toll of panic-triggered responses to the pandemic. By September 2021, before the return of the flu, between 15 and 30 percent of the excess mortality in the U.S. may be attributed to the so-called mitigation efforts (‘The Mystery of Unaccounted Excess Deaths in the U.S.’).
These were lives that were lost in vain — at least 115,000 deaths and possibly twice as many. The consequences of lockdowns and disruptions of normal life did not end in 2021. Lives have continued to be lost in many countries, including the U.K.
Some of the mechanisms are described in my essay ‘Covid: The Death Toll of Panic’.
In numerous essays, I studied excess mortality and explained why trends should be examined over an entire winter (‘flu years’), not by calendar years. Using this approach, I estimated the excess mortality in Europe (‘How Severe was the Pandemic in Europe?’).
In the first year (2019-2020), it was only somewhat higher than in a previous season with severe flu (2017-2018). The second year (2020-2021) was very harsh but far from apocalyptic – about twice as severe as 2017-2018.
In both years, all-cause mortality would have been lower without lockdowns.
Over a dozen essays cover various aspects of Covid vaccines. I showed severe biases in influential studies from Israel and estimated the correct effectiveness against Covid death, which ranged from mediocre to zero or sometimes negative, in the frail elderly.
Using data from the U.K., I showed the questionable effectiveness of the first booster and the futility of the second (fourth dose). In three essays, I estimated the short-term fatality rate of Covid vaccines, which was unacceptable but fortunately not as high as others had suggested.
Long-term fatality is difficult to estimate. One essay describes unacceptable rates of side-effects, as found in a largely unknown official survey in Israel (‘Downplaying the Side Effects of Boosters’).
Did Covid vaccines save millions of lives? Not according to a comparative analysis of Israel with Sweden in the winter of 2020-2021 (‘Thousands of Averted Covid Deaths in Israel: Science Fiction’).
Nor did they reduce the delayed death toll of Covid in Denmark (‘Lockdown and Vaccines: Lessons from Denmark’).
In the last essay, which imagines a future perspective on Covid vaccines, I wrote:
Twenty years later, we are still studying the long-term morbidity and mortality consequences of disseminated lipid nanoparticles (the mRNA carriers), self- manufactured toxic spike protein and aberrant proteins in various tissues, elevated levels of IgG4 antibodies after repeated injections, and the integration of foreign DNA fragments into the genome.
These days, a group of scientists is studying cancer cells from vaccinated patients to determine if foreign DNA is present there.
Chances are that you will not find much on this topic or on other vaccine-related effects in mainstream media.
So, keep following the Daily Sceptic and Brownstone, as I have been doing for a long time.
No end is in sight to the saga of Covid vaccines.
See more here dailysceptic.org
Bold emphasis added
Header image: Westend61
About the author: Dr. Eyal Shahar is Professor Emeritus of Public Health at the University of Arizona. His new book The Covid Pandemic: Unconventional Analytical Essays (2020-2023) is available now.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
VOWG
| #
All a fraud that required nothing except treating the flu.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
@ “They are science, as best as I know it.” How?
https://principia-scientific.com/epidemiologist-could-see-straight-away-covid-was-being-over-hyped/
The question is which science is being followed here – presumably epidemiology. Epidemiology is “the branch of medicine which deals with the incidence, distribution, and possible control of diseases and other factors relating to health.” (https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=65b627a4699ea87d&rlz=1C1CHBD_enCA970CA970&sxsrf=ACQVn0-PV2F5e4y3ngsc5cx7ZWMSlq9kVA:1713448223094&q=epidemiology&si=AKbGX_rYYX5RSQWW4ITS1L-igAzu67p1VV6W_YEOc18CFiYprOfq77jgBk5lsJ4qDN5IUTX2-qHaTRNXlZ99S4Je2sTx9obOWPSSmPk1Sy3rDIMjQij8lH8%3D&expnd=1&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=2ahUKEwiDtLaF9MuFAxV0yxQJHXhsDkwQ2v4IegQIIhAT&biw=2133&bih=1021&dpr=1)
It means it is part of medicine. Sorry to say it, but science is not part of the training or learning of medicines. For example, an M.D. (Doctor of Medicine) is a standard non-science undergraduate degree. Therefore, epidemiology should not be considered a science subject or part of it. (https://bioanalyticx.com/very-important/).
In general, epidemiology depends on the interpretation and/or outcome of diagnosis/testing from the medical area. For example, in the case of the COVID-19 pandemic, the whole story revolves around PCR testing, which by any standard is a fake and fraudulent test, i.e., it has no link to the virus (SARS-COV-2), illness (COVID-19) or mRNA (vaccine development). Hence, all interpretations, including those by epidemiology, will be presumptions or opinion-based, not scientific or factual.
The actual science of medicine is chemistry, particularly analytical chemistry (https://bioanalyticx.com/medical-experts-should-seek-help-in-science-chemistry/). Please consider this.
Reply