UK Elec Rates Five Times Higher Than China’s Thanks To Net Zero
The United Nations established the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change in 1988 and in 1995 the first climate Conference of the Parties (COP1) was held in Berlin
There has been a COP meeting every year since then, apart from 2020 when covid intervened.
Last year COP28 was held in the United Arab Emirates and was attended by 84,000 delegates who flew in from all around the world to lecture the rest of us about the importance of reducing our ‘carbon’ footprint.
In the nearly 30 years since COP conferences began, the U.K. has halved its CO2 emissions so that we now account for a mere one percent of the global total. But in this same time interval, the developing world has massively increased its CO2 emissions.
For example, China’s CO2 emissions have quadrupled and now account for 29% of the global total.
India’s emissions have tripled and now account for seven percent of the global total. Both countries are still increasing their CO2 emissions.
The problem is that ‘green’ technologies are not very good. Electric cars and ‘renewable’ energy are more expensive and inferior in performance to their ‘fossil fuel’ equivalents.
So as the developing world industrializes, it is using ‘fossil fuel’ technology to keep its costs down.
Is it right for the privileged people of the First World to tell the poorest people in the Third World to stop operating gas and coal-fired power stations and stop driving petrol cars because of (unfounded – Ed) worries that in 50 years the planet will be warmer?
Quite understandably the priority for the leaders of the developing world is to improve the lives of people now rather than worry about what may or may not happen in 50 years hence.
Even though [the UK] only produces 1% of global CO2 emissions, our government has decided we must press on with being world leaders in ‘Net Zero’.
Because our ‘carbon footprint’ is already so small, reducing it will further impoverish British people.
For example, we are repeatedly told by the ‘green’ lobby (which these days occupy influential positions in politics, the media, universities, and business) that ‘renewables’ are now the cheapest form of energy generation and we should build ever more wind farms and solar farms.
Since the U.K. is already a world leader in offshore wind, it follows that we should have some of the lowest electricity prices in the world.
In fact, the opposite is true; the U.K. has some of the highest electricity prices in the world.
Typically people in this country pay more than twice as much for electricity as they do in the USA, where shale gas has transformed the energy market, and more than five times as much as in China, where they are still building coal-fired power stations.
The reason the U.K.’s electricity prices are so high is that there is a massive hidden cost in ‘renewables’ its supporters gloss over or never mention, namely the need to have backup energy generation for when the wind doesn’t blow and the sun doesn’t shine.
See more here climatechangedispatch
Header image: Energy Pool
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Herb Rose
| #
There are two duplicate articles on this page. I assume PSI doesn’t want to publish my latest article and deal with the resulting controversy.
Reply