UK Grid Upgrades Will Increase Bills And Reduce Reliability
Last week, the BBC detailed the government’s plans to make Britain’s electricity supply more unreliable
It is not a long article, so I reproduce it in full, with my own comments added.
The UK’s electricity network needs almost a further £60bn of upgrades to hit government decarbonisation targets by 2035, according to a new plan.
Some 4,000 miles of undersea cables and 1,000 miles of power lines including pylons are needed, National Grid’s Electricity Systems Operator said.
The investment would add between £20 to £30 a year to customer bills, it said.
I rather suspect it will add much more than £20-£30 a year to bills.
The government said the ESO’s plans were preliminary and yet to pass a “robust planning process”.
The plans were written up by the ESO, the organisation which runs the electricity network and would run the updated system it is calling for too. It is currently owned by National Grid but will transfer into government ownership later this year.
When ESO transfers to government ownership, said government will tell you they have to increase electricity bills again to help ‘save the planet’.
Its latest £58bn estimate is for work needed between 2030 and 2035 and comes on top of a previous £54bn estimate for work taking place between now and 2030.
The additional infrastructure spend would help get the UK’s offshore wind from where it is produced out at sea, to where it is used by households across the country.
That would be key in making greener energy, according to the ESO, which said the project would be the largest build of its kind for seven decades.
When they say ‘greener’, what they really mean is unreliable.
The government said the plans would support more than 20,000 jobs, but these are preliminary ones that would have to go through a robust planning process – a stage at which many infrastructure plans have failed.
The ESO says this is the kind of ambitious plan needed to deliver clean, secure, decarbonised energy. It called for “swift and co-ordinated” progress, and said that without it, the country’s climate ambitions might be at risk.
Notice the use of the word might. This means it is nothing more than supposition, but the gullible will read it as will.
“Great Britain is about to embark upon the biggest change to the electricity network since the high voltage transmission grid was established back in the 1950s,” it said.
Indeed, and this change will likely require permanent electricity rationing.
New connections and more grid capacity will also be needed as people and companies switch to using electricity for their cars or heating their homes. Renewable forms of generating energy, including through solar and wind farms, will also change the way the grid is shaped.
There is a big assumption that people will fall in line with electrifying everything. So far very few have.
The undersea cables will have to come ashore at various points, predominantly on the east coast of Scotland and England – and from there, on to places near urban centres via overhead pylons or at four times the cost, under the ground. Hot spots for the new pylons include West Wales and a route through East Anglia.
Speaking to the BBC, Jake Rigg, corporate affairs director at the ESO, said conversation with communities across the UK is ongoing.
I’m sure it is ‘ongoing’, but you can bet such schemes will be bulldozed through against all opposition.
Critics have said the plan would deface areas of outstanding national beauty by adding more pylons – the huge steel structures which have been accused of blighting landscapes.
Good point.
“What we’re trying to do is minimise impact on communities, in particular Scotland and East Anglia,” Mr Rigg said, adding that while “undergrounding” can be done to prevent erection of pylons, those processes are more expensive and require more maintenance.
This is quite true, and Mr Rigg would be the first one to complain with a miles-long trench needed to be dug to replace a life-expired or damaged underground cable.
Rosie Pearson lives in Kelvedon in Essex and is the founder of the campaign group Essex Suffolk Norfolk pylons. She said that opponents of the plans are not anti-wind power, but more of the network should be out at sea, and that power lines can – and should – be buried underground.
“Whenever anyone thinks about a grid upgrade, they think about pylons. No-one thinks about these other, better ways of doing things so that’s what upsets people when they’re told they’re going to have a pylon next to their garden.”
A classic example of the NIMBY mentality. I’m all in favour of such schemes as long as they don’t affect the view from my garden.
“We’re fully supportive of the need for a grid upgrade, but what’s got to happen is it’s got to be done in the best way possible and it’s got to bring communities along with it”, she told the BBC.
A spokesperson from the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said: “Any projects taken forward would be required to progress through a robust planning process.
“To keep up with growing demand, work to reinforce the grid would connect more low-cost offshore wind and low carbon energy, helping to future proof our energy supply, reduce bills and bring the UK closer to our net zero goals”.
Low cost?? It annoys me immensely they continue to make such claims while our energy bills continue to rise.
As well as a forecasted rise in projected electricity usage, the UK’s supply of energy was affected by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
It prompted the National Grid’s ESO to run a scheme allowing discounts for some households if they reduced energy usage during peak hours, as well as broader questions on the UK’s energy security.
What questions are those? We are not told. Energy security can only be achieved if you have reliable base-load electricity generation operating 24 hours a day, but governments want to remove that and replace it with grids that will be unable to produce enough electricity for everyone.
Rationing will mean government buildings, the emergency services and hospitals will have to be prioritised, and the rest of us will have to live with frequent power outages.
We will be paying more money for a service we often cannot use.
How are people going to heat their homes or charge their EV’s then?
See the BBC article here bbc.co.uk
About the author: Andy Rowlands is a university graduate in space science and British Principia Scientific International researcher, writer and editor who co-edited the new climate science book, ‘The Sky Dragon Slayers: Victory Lap‘
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Alan
| #
I worked in this industry and it is disgraceful to read how it has changed to become utterly incompetent.
Reply
Howdy
| #
“Notice the use of the word might. This means it is nothing more than supposition”
“To keep up with growing demand, work to reinforce the grid would connect more low-cost offshore wind and low carbon energy, helping to future proof our energy supply, reduce bills and bring the UK closer to our net zero goals”
The people going for this must be soothsayers if they can predict future weather will allways be favourable and make the supply available be in excess of normal maximum demand, because nobody with sense runs a project flat out continuously since there is no margin for failure, and maintenance increases, as well as component lifetime being reduced, thus added cost.
Reply
Carbon Bigfoot
| #
And you blokes gave up your arms….willingly just sayin.
Reply
Andy Rowlands
| #
We didn’t give up anything ‘willingly’. Hand guns were made illegal here after the 1996 Dunblane school shootings. Rifles and shotguns are allowed if you are either a farmer or member of a gun club.
Reply