Does The Covid Virus Actually Exist Or Not?
Like many in the Covid space, we try to bring to light important, credible and reliable facts upon which readers can base their own judgement
We all bring our own unique perspective and experience to try and cut through the misinformation and disinformation which has been propagated by government, bad Pharma, paid medical spruikers, connected “experts” and the complicit and dishonest main stream media.
The social media has provided an important highway to connect people like never before. This is critically important.
The beauty of social media platforms (I include Substacks) is that we can all have a view and these views can be debated, challenged and/or contribute to the overall understanding of an issue.
After more than three years of misinformation and disinformation, it is natural that people have become distrustful of government and experts alike. A healthy response.
Since starting this Substack of January 2023, some of the most frequent comments posted on my Posts relate to the existence of the COVID-19 virus itself – SARS-CoV-2. I have come to realise that there are actually many who do not believe that SARS-CoV-2 exists and I have steered clear of the debate – until now.
It is an important debate to have because if the full truth behind the Covid scam is to be revealed in full, we cannot let ourselves be distracted by issues which undermine important clinical and scientific evidence that is required to do the job properly.
CLICK HERE to view a 53 min. podcast of Dr. David Martin explaining how the “bioweapon” SARS-CoV-2 was not a virus of natural origin but was a virus engineered using gain-of-function and the subsequent development and deployment of “COVID-19 vaccines” was the greatest scam in history.
The detail in this podcast is impressive.
I, for one, believe what Dr. Martin is saying. One cannot overestimate his contribution to the uncovering of the massive Covid deception. But, to me, if one takes the position that viruses do not exist, then the evidence that Dr. Martin (and many others) are producing would have little relevance or usefulness.
Those perpetuating the Covid scam would be delighted to have another “conspiracy theory” upon which to refer. Maybe I’m missing something here…..but that is how I see it.
So, what is the evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus exists? Surprisingly, there appears to me to be relative little convincing evidence to argue the virus does not exist. To do this, wouldn’t one need to dismiss the long history of Gain-of-Function academic projects, contracts, genetic sequencing and patents?
Australian Dr. Geoff Pain has published widely in relation to DNA and endotoxin contamination of the COVID-19 “vaccines” and I work with him and follow his work closely.
Geoff knows about this space. CLICK HERE to view his Substack of 12 Jan. 2024 in which he shares a photograph of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and provides “a brief summary of the first isolation and successful culture of Covid19 from Wuhan outside China and export of the live virus to numerous labs in the world.”
The electron micrograph of SARS-CoV-2 virus below shows “the presence of virus particles with morphology characteristic of viruses of the family Coronaviridae” – a 100 nm spherical viron displaying the characteristic crown‐like fringe of spike proteins.
So, here is a photograph of the virus.
See more here substack.com
Header image: TCI Telecommunications
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Bob
| #
That’s an exosome! the virus doesn’t exist!
Reply
Corona Hotspot
| #
Only “in silico”, in their silicon valley computers…
—
Everyone should listen to and understand what only a few real doctors dare to say. One of them is Dr. Amandha Vollmer. Listen to her starting at 55:30: https://rumble.com/v4gg0al-the-architect.html?start=3330
If the world knew what dis-ease is and that there is no virus the medical industrial sickness and eugenics complex would be finished.
There are no “viral infections” because there is no virus. The virus is a carefully constructed fiction to enable things that would be impossible otherwise.
S. a. Hegelian dialectic.
Watch the videos of Dr. Thomas Cowan, Dr. Stefan Lanka, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Amandha Vollmer, Steve Falconer (Spacebusters)…
Reply
Tom
| #
As far as I am concerned, no viruses exist in nature and I am not in the least bit worried about using any big pharma drugs to protect myself. The modern stone age medical mafia and all the medical experts can go to the devil. All that they engage in and preach is based on a mountain of lies.
Reply
Gerald Brennan
| #
Tiresome nonsense from someone who will not dig deeply enough to understand the issue.
Reply
Dave
| #
NO!
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Wow! What happened here
@ “Surprisingly, there appears to me to be relative little convincing evidence to argue the virus does not exist.”
Dr. Phillip Altman is saying it. His proof of virus existence
“the presence of virus particles with morphology characteristic of viruses of the family Coronaviridae.” Wow, a photo of some junk with a circle proves the virus exists.
There is something greater hidden under the article narrative than claims that the “virus” exists.
I am worried.
Reply
Tom O
| #
What is hidden is the “desire” to “believe,” not the proof. I well recall it being said that the sequencing of the virus was computer generated from a collection of genetic pieces, that this collection was not in any previously cataloged virus, not that they ever saw or isolated the virus itself. I have often wondered HOW you determine “variants” from something that was never isolated. I decided it was by noticing new ‘symptoms” that could be attributed to it. I don’t recall any of Dr. Martin’s many speeches saying that the “virus” was isolated. I do believe he said processes and products were patented, however. So again, the underlying “theme” of the article was “I want to believe and trust the authority.”
Reply
MattH
| #
In early 2020 there were 26 doctors in England who died from the circulating illness. Of this number, 25 were of sub continent, African, or dark pigmented skin ethnicity.
Dr. David Grimes, pioneering vitamin D researcher, contacted the appropriate ethnic medical support network, the email went out to the doctors advising taking vitamin D supplements, and only one more dark pigmented skin doctor died.
Something killed these doctors which needs to be explained if it was not a covid virus.
Thank you for looking at the Dr David Denning video, “we have to get rid of the medieval warm period” where he states that to debunk a prevailing theory one should provide an alternative hypothesis.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Why should one provide a false and fraudulent theory to replace another false and fraudulent? Just proving that the first false and fraudulent theory is false and fraudulent is a better approach.
Reply
graham
| #
nice pics of an exosome, a normal function of a cell, more to the point there are zero pics of a supposed “virus” actually entering a cell to be found anywhere by anyone in the world …
Reply
Antonio
| #
Il virus è il vaccino o arma biologica……
Reply
Warren Klein
| #
Anyone practising in the regulated medical industry is required to acknowledge and conform to the current virus theory. Failure to do so results in rejection, disqualification etc. The local GP is not permitted to have any role and is required to accept approved theories as dogma.
Virus theory, is just that, a current predominant theory. For example DNA would never have been isolated and studied without theories.
The problem with Virus theory is that it is imposed as dogma, which it is not. The pharmaceutical industrie’s treat Virus theory as dogma and are largely unchallenged. Those willing to challenge Virus theory frequently make the point that, no virus of any type, has ever been isolated within the normal meaning of isolate. Substitute isolation tests involving monkey kidney cells are just more theories, not proof.
Scientists need to be able to be Scientists again.
Reply