Critical Appraisal of Multi-Drug Therapy
I have been struck with two observations throughout the COVID-19 crisis: 1) hospitalizations occurred because of lack of early ambulatory treatment, 2) nearly all the deaths occurred in hospitals, not at home
As I was treating and advising collectively on thousands of cases over 2020 and 2021 I became very comfortable with understanding that a low oxygen saturation <94 percent was not a trigger for alarm.
Provided the work of breathing was not too difficult and the ability to think clearly and follow instructions was solid, patients could be treated at home with supplemental oxygen then the McCullough Protocol which includes full anticoagulation.
I recall treating a physician and her husband ages 58 and 60, both with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and O2 saturations in the 70’s for weeks during the Delta outbreak spanning August-September, 2021.
At times saturations would dip below 70 perent while getting up to the kitchen or bathroom. Both of them knew they were safer at home on multidrug treatment than going to the hospital.
Many hospitals had protocols that would have immediately paralyzed and sedated this couple then placed on them mechanical ventilators. This could have been the kiss of death.
Yes, the couple survived with no complications and our collective confidence grew that “permissive hypoxemia” was well tolerated and very different from other forms of consolidative pneumonia, heart failure, and COPD.
This new form of hypoxemia we were observing was due to micro-blood clots in the lungs. It means the alveoli were not clogged with fluid, but the problem was blood flow to the capillaries.
So by supporting the patients and providing anticoagulation, we could ride out the storm at home.
Gkioulekas et al, have published an analysis of the peer-reviewed clinical studies demonstrating safety of allowing hypoxemia to occur provided patients were treated with multidrug regimens.
These papers relied heavily on the early use of ivermectin, which has an effect of unhooking the Spike protein from red blood cells, thus reducing hemagglutination and the micro-blood clotting process.
The clinical results speak for themselves.
The use of the the pulse oximeter was a big mistake in the pandemic.
We should have relied on clinical assessment, the work of breathing, and mentation.
It’s my view that a large fraction of even the most severe cases could have been treated at home with supplemental oxygen and support.
The hospitals became a death trap for COVID-19 victims as families can attest to today.
See more here substack.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Wisenox
| #
Here’s the UN’s celebrity covid doctors “Spike Detox” advertisement for Ivermectin again. Been lots of those lately, but why?
Perhaps because they were about to announce a new variant? They just announced the ‘penis’ variant, or ‘Pirola’ as it’s called by the MSM.
The only covid believers I know are people who don’t know how it was isolated/discovered using denovo assembly.
Adults know and form their own opinion, but the idiots and sheep believe what they’re told, like children.
Know the risks of Ivermectin before taking it. It’s always recommended by physicians to read the risks and drug interactions for a medicine, so do so beforehand.
Reply