FDA Ignored Covid ‘Vaccine’ Safety Warnings By Own Scientists
Throughout my lifetime, I have heard people claim that the future will bring better technology and that science will make the world a better place and solve all our problems
Yet, again and again, these promises fail to materialize, and we are perpetually stuck waiting for science’s promised future.
In many cases however, the technology was in fact developed. The problem however was that the technology’s development threatened someone’s ability to make money (or gain power) so the technology was buried and never saw the light of day.
For example, throughout COVID-19 we heard numerous promises that a solution to the pandemic was around the corner (e.g., the miraculous vaccines) yet each time an un-patentable solution (e.g., ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine) was found, the pandemic-industrial-complex ruthless suppressed it to ensure their grift could continue.
Within the field of data, a similar issue exists. The mantra from Silicon Valley which has gradually entered the rest of the culture is that “more data” is the solution to all of our problems. However, once that data gets in the way of someone’s ability to make money, it often never sees the light of day.
In a recent article, I showed how there have been numerous vaccine disasters where a rushed vaccine was developed, the FDA was warned by its own scientists the vaccine was not safe (often due to its rushed production method) and then rather than heed those warnings, the government chose to bring the vaccine to market and have every authority repeat the mantra that the vaccine was “safe and effective.”
Then once Americans began to be injected and data started accumulating showing the vaccine was indeed not safe, the government instead chose to double-down on its position, insisting the vaccine was safe and doing whatever it could to cover up that inconvenient data—all of which also happened with the COVID-19 vaccines.
In each of the past vaccine disasters, the dangers of the vaccine were eventually exposed by the media, before long the unsafe vaccine was pulled from the market, and ultimately, there was some degree of accountability (e.g., the responsible officials had to resign or the victims received financial compensation through the courts).
Seeing that this was not good for business, the vaccine industry in turn adopted a few strategies which radically tilted the deck in their favor:
•Bill Clinton in 1997 legalized direct to consumer pharmaceutical (drug) advertisement (something only otherwise legal in New Zealand). Since most of the pharmaceutical industry’s expenditures are in advertising, this allowed them to become the dominant advertisers on television, and within a few years, the networks stopped being willing to air stories critical of vaccinations, even when the CEO personally supported the story being aired.
Note: the final unsafe vaccine the American media exposed was George W. Bush’s 2002 “emergency” smallpox vaccine (which rapidly ended the program because there were too many injuries in the military). Not long after, in 2006, the incredibly dangerous HPV vaccine entered the market, and despite a deluge of injuries, the American media would not touch it—instead it was exposed by a Danish network in 2015.
•Vaccine manufacturers were exempted from liability for their products—instead vaccine injuries were delegated to a federal compensation program which only allowed a narrow range of injuries to receive compensation. This understandably took away the industry’s motivation to produce safer vaccines.
•The vaccine industry worked with the FDA to create a variety of regulations for “emergency” vaccines which waived both the existing requirements to prove safety or efficacy and the ability to pursue the manufacturers in the legal system (either by directly suing them or though the federal vaccine injury compensation program).
Note: the “compensation” program for the COVID vaccines, according to a 2/21/23 congressional report has thus far not provided compensation to anyone injured by these “emergency” products.
See more here midwesterndoctor.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Tom
| #
These agencies, including the CDC are nothing more than paid off murder clubs.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
@ “ … By Own Scientists …”
@ “ … the FDA was warned by its own scientists the vaccine was not safe (often due to its rushed production method) …”
I note the above phrases, which remind me of my discussion about defining “science” and, by extension, “scientists” on FB. The readers here may like to follow the discussion. It may be quite helpful.
Currently, most “science” and “scientists” have been created (like “viruses) by their own developed and narrated definitions, not the actual science. They tell stories created by defined “science.” Be watchful of them; many/most are in the world-famous three-letter organizations.
In their view, the problem of vaccines is due to “rush” production. Vaccines are not fake and fraudulent for non-existing viruses or illnesses, meaning there is no issue with science or viruses. The rush caused the issue, and let us continue with the (fake and fraudulent) science.
As an example, here is my recent post on FB (https://www.facebook.com/saeed.qureshi.5201/posts/pfbid02xiufh2wRr3H6YqvG1Rq3wCRLT61geuRxdMmijofwYZVUiUCo7rgvtSHMmzJ4u6BTl)
Gab Masson
No problem.
We are discussing to achieve some good and best for us and the public. Words could be heard, read, or said, reflecting different meanings than intended. And we will sort them out and clarify – as here.
From my side, “clear” means that science is chemistry, physics, and mathematics. On the other hand, pharmaceutical science (as an example) is not science but a user or derivative of science (which is chemistry).
However, based on my experience working with them for so long, they consider it stand-alone science (with chemicals and chemistry) and have been making blunders. I have been writing about them (blunders) for at least twenty years now.
Most of my blog articles are about blunders in pharmaceutical science. So much so they are using scientifically non-validated methods/tests all along – a cardinal scientific sin. However, if one likes to point out the flaw, they restore to their own definition of “science” to justify and rationalize their work as “science.”
That is why I avoid getting into definitions or defining science (in words and phrases). It is a blatant trick and mischief to deceive and fool people. Hence, I avoid partying in such discussions.
So, when I say science is clear, or its definition is clear, it means science is physics, chemistry, and mathematics, as I wrote earlier, with few exceptions, having limitations and qualifications.
We may discuss this in further detail if you like. I will be happy to do so.
Reply
herb
| #
The vaccines which are not vaccines they are gene therapy but that for another day were already formulated and ready to go back in 2019 .
This warp speed narrative is 100% bogus and just meant to shift blame on Trump .
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
@ “Gene therapy” like viruses, PCR, and mRNA vaccines is also invented name to sell (extremely) high-priced medication and “research.” As far as I know, everything in this category seems gunk but is given different catchy names/labels.
Reply
Dennis Morehouse
| #
The good news is…. or maybe the bad news… is that people are wakening up.
Reply