More Positive Randomized Trial Results with Nattokinase
With the advent of McCullough Protocol Base Spike Detoxification, there has been a surge of Nattokinase use in clinical practice. While the Japanese have been using Nattokinase for its cardiovascular benefits for decades, the Chinese and now western societies are learning more about its effects in the body.
Lui et al performed a prospective double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of Nattokinase, a fermentation product from soy combined with Monascus used in the fermentation product of rice.
Natto, a fermented soybean product from China, has been used for many years with rare safety disputes [10]. It contains biologically active substances like nattokinase that can improve blood lipids and vascular and fibrinolytic activity. However, an increase in blood uric acid concentration after soybean consumption has been reported in some individuals [11]. Red yeast rice (RYR) is a natural extract obtained via the fermentation of white rice with the yeast monascus purpureus mold and is widely used to reduce serum cholesterol in patients. Monascus can produce biologically active substances with hypolipidemic effects, such as lovastatin (monacolin K) and gamma-aminobutyric acid [12]. However, the toxin citrinin, found naturally in RYR, has been associated with hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity [13]. In addition, intakes of RYR failed to produce monacolins in certain subgroups of the population [9,14].
A total of 2300 volunteers were initially assessed at Jing Yuan County Hospital Traditional Chinese Medicine, and 113 eligible patients were enrolled. Patients received oral natto and Monascus capsules (975 mg twice daily, NMS (a fermented product containing Nattokinase 2500 fibrinolytic units (FUs) derived from Natto and Lovastatin 7 mg derived from RYR, NMS group); or matching placebo. Importantly this is a product a daily dose of 5000 FU of Nattokinase and 14 mg of Lovastatin. The dosing range of prescription Lovastatin is 20-80 mg a day. Nevertheless, 14 mg a day would influence cholesterol levels slightly.
Source: Courageous Discourse
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Wisenox
| #
Another ad for McCullough and his ‘spike detox’ crap.
You don’t need to detox from a fake virus that never left a denovo assembler. It’s an in-silico genome because it is only a computer model.
McCullough is also featured as sponsored ads on Zerohedge, and that should tell you all you need to know.
Reply
Len Winokur
| #
Even allowing for the fictitious and computer-generated nature of the purported SARS-CoV-2 virus as such, the abstract of the article to which the “McCullough Protocol Base Spike Detoxification” takes us, does include the statement that “spike protein has been found to exhibit pathogenic characteristics and be a possible cause of post-acute sequelae after … COVID-19 vaccination.” What makes McCullough’s writing confusing is his conflation of the theoretical sequence of the purported SARS-Cov-2 virus, with the very real material spike protein (whether synthesized as such in the laboratory, or in and by the body from the lab-synthesised mRNA added to the vaccines). My understanding is that it is this lab-synthesized physical spike protein that evidence has shown to cause damage in the cardiovascular (and hematological). Even if McCullough believes, erroneously, that the SARS-Cov-2 virus actually exists, it does not follow from this error that the very real spike protein present in, or arising from, the injected vaccines lacks toxic effects and/or that nattokinase shows promise as a remedy for these toxic effects.
Reply
Len Winokur
| #
Oops, in the final sentence above I meant to write “Even if McCullough believes, erroneously, that the SARS-Cov-2 virus actually exists, it does not follow from this error that the very real spike protein present in, or arising from, the injected vaccines lacks toxic effects and/or that nattokinase does not shows promise as a remedy for these toxic effects.
Reply
Len Winokur
| #
Oops, in the final sentence above I meant to write “Even if McCullough believes, erroneously, that the SARS-Cov-2 virus actually exists, it does not follow from this error that the very real spike protein present in, or arising from, the injected vaccines lacks toxic effects and/or that nattokinase does not shows promise as a remedy for these toxic effects.
Reply
Leave a comment
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Donate Today!
Currently, joining PSI is free. When you make a donation of the suggested amount of $25 (any amount will help, though!) you will help to sponsor sound, alarmist-free scientific work.
Follow Us!
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Sign-Up For A Daily Digest Of Posts Or Get Instant Notifications
Get a Daily Digest OR instantly notified of new posts by email. (Please check your SPAM folder)
Email Address
Now On Sale! Principia-Scientific International experts explain history’s biggest medical fraud!
TNT Radio – Today’s News Talk
moh cover june 2023
Latest News
Watch Principia Scientific’s 2023 ‘Wrap Up’ on TNT Radio! December 22, 2023
No “Greenhouse Effect” Possible The Way the UN Defines It December 22, 2023
A Star Witness of the Criminal Pandemic Response December 22, 2023
[My final, clearer, edit.] In the final sentence above I meant to write “Even if McCullough believes, erroneously, that the SARS-Cov-2 virus actually exists, it does not follow from this error that the very real spike protein present in, or arising from, the injected vaccines lacks toxic effects and/or that nattokinase does not show promise as a remedy for the vaccines’ toxic effects.
Reply