Greenpeace Canada Co-Founder: There Is No Climate Emergency
The co-founder of Greenpeace Canada told podcast host Dan Proft that “climate alarmism is 100 percent untrue.”
“They said it was the hottest year in the history of the earth the other day, and it’s not,” Patrick Moore told Proft on the “Counterculture” podcast. “That’s just, period, a lie.”
“The whole climate alarmism — ‘climate catastrophe’ — is 100 percent untrue,” said Moore. “We are not in a climate crisis.”
Moore told Proft that “there is nothing really that radical happening” with the climate, and it’s essential to “seek the truth” and “sort out what is true and what isn’t.”
This full interview is available on Rumble, YouTube, and Spotify.
Moore is the co-founder of Greenpeace Canada and is currently a director of the CO2 Coalition, a non-partisan foundation that educates policy leaders and the public about the important contributions of carbon dioxide to our lives and the economy.
In 2013, Moore published Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout – The Making of a Sensible Environmentalist, which documents his 15 years with Greenpeace and outlines his vision for a sustainable future.
See more here amgreatness.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Alan
| #
If CO2 Coalition is educating policy makers and the public about CO2, all I can say it is a 100% failure.
Reply
Tom Anderson
| #
Agreed. You cannot win an argument using your opponent’s points and principles. Only a few sidelined physicists have had the insight and capacity to annihilate climate alarmism for its lack of substance, validity, or even ordinary good sense.
Reply
Robert
| #
I will say there is a possibility something was used at the bottom of the towers to create that heat and I do not know what it was. But for building 7 it was a conventional demolition using explosives. the two towers were shot from the top with each floor below firing in a delayed sequence. until it reached the bottom. This was done by drilling the concrete structures on each floor and placing explosives in them. From every angle I have seen the ignition was from the top down and each floor below was fired in a delayed sequence until it reached the bottom. This was done that way to create the pancaking floors narrative. The speed which the film was shown can be enhanced by slowing the film to enhance the pancaking narrative. There was significant time put into preparing those towers for demolition which would have involved . Separate crews for each building supervised by a blaster in charge for each one. And the preparatory work would have to have been supervised at all times by the guy responsible for the blast in that building. Including the loading and tie up of those blasts and the delays that were used to create the perfect demolition shot that happened. And like I said before this would have taken multiple months in each building depending on the size of the crews that were available to do the work. . Usually a blast like that would have a fuse lit at the top where the shot started . Lighting a fuse would guarantee the timing of the shot with no chance of premature detonation by electric or radio or cellular communication which would have been a big risk. What that means is the building owners and security people would have to have been complicit in this crime. I understand there was bullion in vaults at the bottom of one of the towers and with the size of this caper they of course would have removed the bullion and the last part of the blast at the bottom maybe something else was used to obscure any chance of finding evidence that this was also a huge fraud and theft .I often think of the son of a bitch that lit the fuse and walked out of that building as people were coming in and firemen were heading in . The guys were pretty good blasters but they were the lowest quality of human I can think about. This job was covered up by people in high office and they all should be brought to justice .And most governments around the world would or could have had advice about this and questioned the narrative but most governments in the word are well practiced liars themselves.
Reply