Oppenheimer Ranch Project – Flat Earth Climate Alarm Debunking
In this video, The Oppenheimer Ranch Project debunk the Flat Earth Climate Alarm with Joe Postma.
It is mentioned in the video, that Joe Postma was recently canned from the University of Calgary because of the topics he openly discusses and debates including Climate Change.
Postma has a Master’s Degree in Astrophysics, he is a climate alarm debunker and ontological mathematics makes him particularly interesting.
Source: YouTube
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Joe,
I searched ‘Who is O DORRIKHTEH?” and I found that he is a philosopher. I accept that Galileo Galilei, an Italian mathematics professor, totally discredited the “physical knowledge”” of the philosopher Aristotle about 400 years ago by observing physical facts. Maybe the scientists at the University of Calgary finally saw the ‘light’.
Have a good day
Reply
Kevin Doyle
| #
Jerry, I think you may be a bit harsh in your criticism. Joseph Postma has very good observations when it comes to planetary movement, and how the Sun actually warms the Earth. He may not be the best at communicating this, i.e. – lack of brevity. He may have a few strong opinions, but I would say his basic observations on sunlight heating half of the globe are correct. This basic observation drops an anvil on the heads of ‘Greenhouse Gas Theory’ folks who believe the Earth’s surface should be -18 Celsius, thus they create an imaginary ‘delicate atmosphere’ which magically heats the Earth by 33 degrees Celsius. (Ridiculous.) Thus, the Greta Thunberg followers believe any minor change in the chemical composition of this ‘hypersensitive atmosphere’ will lead to catastrophic results.
It is important to point out this basic assumption is completely false.
I imagine you would agree on this, as a point of intellectual and scientific honesty?
Reply