Don’t be silly….surely you know Covid came from bat soup!
We are now living in crazy times. Who would have believed that our government would have told us that an experimental gene-based injection was “safe and effective” when there was no credible evidence or studies to support such a claim and then advocate that this injection be given to healthy people, pregnant women, children and babies
Why would they lie to us? Why would we be told that natural immunity to COVID-19 was irrelevant?
Why were we told that there was absolutely no effective treatment for COVID-19 and no alternative to COVID-19 vaccination?
Why were we told that masks and lockdowns prevent transmission of the virus? Why would they lie to us?
Well, they did lie to us and now the cover up begins.
The COVID INQUIRY just announced by our Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese, is a joke. A very bad joke.
The shills who will steer this inquiry all know what is required of them. They could write the outcome now and save everybody a whole lot to time. The whole sorry mess will be brushed under the carpet and those responsible for the unnecessary deaths and suffering will get off Scot Free.
Albanese will be able to claim he fulfilled his promise and the government will be in a position to repeat the tyrannical policies all over again…coerced injections of dangerous experimental gene-based “vaccines”, masking to instil fear, lockdowns and mass censorship to prevent the public from knowing the truth.
It is no wonder that many so-called “conspiracy theories” abound. Calling something a “conspiracy theory” is a cheap way of dismissing evidence in plain sight. These so-called “conspiracy theories” have a nasty habit of coming true.
Think WEF/WHO and world control, think Bill Gates and population control, think the “Plandemic”, think Geoffrey Epstein “suicide”, think JFK assassination, think voter fraud, think covering up the dangers of 5G, plans for transhumanism etc etc. It gets pretty dark.
In fact, a playbook for a SARS pandemic was written in 2017 (Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, Baltimore, MD, USA).
It looks like pandemics present a convenient excuse to enforce totalitarian government control. This is why you need to understand the truth of the current COVID-19 “pandemic” and what may come next.
This is the main purpose of my Substacks.
The SPARS wargaming exercise conducted by the John Hopkins Center for Health Security predicted that a viral pandemic would be based on a SARS virus with a case fatality rate of 0.6% rather than something much higher.
As some conspiracy theorists suggest, the best bioweapon is one that is not recognised as a bioweapon and comes from an unidentified enemy. In this fictious wargaming exercise, the case fatality rate was no worse than influenza and so the public won’t really connect the dots. Ring a bell?
This is chilling. Back to the real world – with a large part of the population now having immune systems weakened by COVID vaccination (most of the people now in hospital with COVID-19 are fully vaccinated and boosted), the next pandemic will take a high toll.
THE CURIOUS CASE OF N-acetyl cysteine (NAC)
As with other proven useful COVID-19 therapeutics which were banned or blocked from use (eg. invermectin, hydroxychloroquin, Vit D, Zinc), NAC was attacked by drug regulators who pushed the “vaccines”. This automatically makes me think it may be worthwhile having a closer look at the potential use of NAC. 🙂
If you go to the FLCCC website (https://covid19criticalcare.com) you will find references to NAC and its potential usefulness in COVID-19.
Here are a few references below.
The links are:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795755/
https://www.printfriendly.com/p/g/4LqKwa
The first paper (above) by Izquierdo et al published January 2022 states:
“Out of 19,208 patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 hospitalized, we studied 2071 (10.8 percent) users of oral NAC at high doses.
COVID-19 patients treated with NAC were older, predominantly male, and with more comorbidities such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and COPD when compared with those not on NAC (all p < 0.05).
Despite greater baseline risk, use of NAC in COVID-19 patients was associated with significantly lower mortality (OR 0.56; 95 percentCI 0.47–0.67), a finding that remained significant in a multivariate analysis adjusting by baseline characteristics and concomitant use of corticosteroids.” [bolding added for emphasis]
NAC can be produced by the body naturally from other dietary amino acids methionine and serine. NAC is found in many foods. Therapeutically, NAC is recognised and used as an anti-inflammatory drug.
NAC was also used as a dietary supplement for a long time but in 2022 the US FDA has blocked its use as a dietary supplement. NAC is also a valuable therapeutic as an emergency injection to counter the serious liver damage following paracetamol overdose.
Paracetamol, in fact, is a very dangerous drug in overdose and many people die each year due to the toxicity of this drug.
It is worthwhile to note that ivermectin, which was claimed to be highly toxic horse dewormer by our “trusted health experts”, is a vastly much safer drug as compared to paracetamol. I digress (could not resist, apologies).
NAC was first approved by the FDA as a respiratory drug in 1963. The FDA for some strange reason began to attack NAC usage in 2010 but opposition to NAC by the FDA has been elevated recently.
Some speculate this is due to new clinical investigations into the use of NAC for COVID-19 (sound familiar?). It seems the FDA has a habit of attacking the credibility of generic, inexpensive, safe and useful drugs which might be used in place of expensive, patented drugs.
Many, including myself, are convinced the US FDA is fully captured by Big Pharma and advice, from this once respected drug regulator, should be treated with a degree of caution.
INTERNATIONAL RADIO – TNT
I will be interviewed by Greg Maybury this Sunday if you wish to listen.
See more here substack.com
Header image: Forbes
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Wisenox
| #
“NAC was attacked by drug regulators who pushed the “vaccines”. This automatically makes me think it may be worthwhile having a closer look at the potential use of NAC.”
That’s one of their scams. They purposely attack one of their own entities so that people will blindly pick a side. South Park did an episode about in one of their trolling series.
On top of that, its another scam/push, just like Ivermectin and glutathione.
They push these propaganda pieces to get you overloaded on materials that help their agenda. They may work to make you susceptible to something, or enhance their nanoparticles, could be many things.
In the case of NAC, cysteine rich regions are needed for their fusion methods with the cells. There’s probably other reasons as well, and its unlikely that your diet is deficient in it.
In the case of glutathione, it reduces carbon nanotubes after they’re exposed to EMF or 640nm red light. The nanotube aligns the oxygen molecules in its interior and is then able to conduct electrical current.
They attack their own so that you’ll pick a side without thinking. Watch the South Park episode, it explains it perfectly.
Reply