Climate Brainwashing In Schools Is Bordering On Child Abuse
Hammering K-12 school children nonstop about ‘ climate change’ in every class, even math, art, and gym, is tantamount to child abuse
Barely one-third of fourth graders can read or do math at grade level, according to the latest national scores, but climate activists are demanding kids hear about global warming in every class.
New Jersey mandates it, and now Connecticut is following suit as the school year opens.
In New York City, Mayor Eric Adams is requiring every public school to participate in ‘Climate Action Day’.
The climate push is nakedly political, spearheaded in New Jersey by the governor’s wife, first lady Tammy Murphy, a founding member of Al Gore’s Climate Reality Project.
Lessons link urban heat islands to tree-placement inequities, redlining, and racism.
New York City holds out activist Greta Thunberg as a climate hero and role model, telling kids to “get involved in the global student climate action movement” and “get to know community leaders and register to vote.”
Everything short of pre-enrolling kindergarteners in the Democratic Party. Parents should be outraged.
Climate change is now a religion. The messaging is as heavy-handed as a catechism in a religious school.
It’s also scary. Children are being told that global warming is killing their favorite animals.
At Slackwood Elementary School in New Jersey, first graders are taught that transportation, heating, and raising livestock are “making Earth feel unwell.”
The reality is that these children are too young to comprehend the trade-offs of moving to zero ‘carbon’ immediately.
A first grader doesn’t know Mommy can’t afford an electric vehicle — average price: $53,000.
Children should be taught about the wonders of nature, learning to identify mammals, reptiles, fish and birds, oceans, plants, and deserts.
They are too young to address the ethical and economic implications of eliminating ‘fossil fuels’.
First graders don’t understand the impact on their family’s budget when the Con Ed bill doubles to pay for the shift to wind and solar, which New Yorkers were warned would happen here.
The U.S. has already reduced emissions of the six most common pollutants by 78 percent since 1970, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.
But try explaining that to a first grader who doesn’t know percentages and has no frame of reference for comparing the U.S. record with, say, the soaring pollution rates in China and India.
These issues are appropriate for high school students, and they should be presented as controversies — with all viewpoints included.
Climate education advocates say they’re just teaching “facts” everyone agrees on. Don’t buy it.
The scientific community is divided about the urgency of eliminating ‘fossil fuels’.
A poll by Fairleigh Dickinson University of 400 geologists, climatologists, meteorologists, and other scientists found that 41 percent do not believe global warming will cause “significant harm” during our lifetimes.
A majority of scientists also disagree with the claim kids hear from teachers that we’re facing a significant increase in severe weather like hurricanes and tornadoes.
We aren’t. In a warmer world you get LESS bad weather not more.
Eliminating fossil fuels on the radical green timetable will clobber ordinary people: costing jobs, raising living costs, and weakening America’s position in the world.
Yet ‘climate change’ educators oppose any discussion of the cost of getting to zero.
California, New York, and Oregon are currently considering mimicking New Jersey’s “every class is a climate class” curriculum. But some states are resisting.
Texas state education authorities are urging districts to present the pros and cons of ‘fossil fuels’ and avoid textbooks that present only one side.
That’s smart, considering how many moms and dads there earn a living in ‘carbon’-related industries.
In Ohio, Republican state lawmakers want to require publicly funded colleges to present all viewpoints on ‘climate change’, “encourag(ing) students to reach their own conclusions,” and not to “inculcate any social, political, or religious point of view.”
Good luck enforcing that on college campuses. But it should be the rule in every public school.
Parents: Stand up to the indoctrinators. Ramming the same scary message into your child’s head over and over again in class after class is brainwashing.
We live in America, not China.
See more here climatechangedispatch
Some bold emphasis added
Header image: Climate Home News
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Carmel
| #
Brainwashing/indoctrinating children is surely an abuse?!
Regardless of the high cost of EV’s….seriously what sane mommy would go strap their child/children into a vehicle containing a high fire/explosion risk….potential stationary/mobile battery bomb?!
Reply
Greg Spinolae
| #
No “bordering” about it. Lying to children with the objective of manipulating them to perform acts of self-harm is arguably QUINTESSENTIAL child-abuse.
Reply
Rabble Rouser
| #
“Parents” continue willfully handing their kids over to the Bolsheviks for brainwashing and indoctrination, mostly because they’re too lazy to raise and educate them themselves, so who’s really to blame?
You configure your life so you can’t get along without the free nanny state babysitting, then you’re looking for someone else to blame when you’re kids turn against you.
Reply
VOWG
| #
Mental midgets.
Reply