Reliance On Batteries To Backup Wind And Solar Spell DOOM
The City of Ottawa’s ‘Climate Change Master Plan’ will introduce batteries to backup wind and solar power
This is not only ridiculous, but dangerous.
In its all-encompassing and wildly ambitious plan to ‘stop global warming,’ the City has adopted short, mid, and long-term ‘greenhouse gas’ reduction targets based on 2012 levels.
The brain trust at the City actually thinks they can, and will, reduce Community emissions by 100 percent by 2050, and city operations emissions by 100 percent by 2040 — all this in a city of one million souls with temperatures often down to minus 30 degrees Celsius.
The magnitude of the “renewable” energy projects that Ottawa plans to engage in to meet its insane net-zero targets is astonishing: 36 square kilometers of rooftop solar will be required, a 161,485 percent increase over today’s levels, 710 industrial wind turbines, each taller than the Peace Tower, and 122 large shipping containers of lithium batteries for power storage.
Each of these projects will be devastating to the City.
To reduce emissions by 100 percent by 2050, we would need enough electricity storage for renewable power to meet demand and offset emissions on the provincial power grid. The model relied upon by the City indicates that the following will be needed:
- Solar photovoltaic (PV) reaches 1,060 MW by 2050 (approximately 36 km2 of solar PV47)
- Wind generation reaches 3,218 MW by 2050 (approximately 710 large-scale turbines)
- 310 MW of local energy storage by 2030 and 612 MW by 2050 (122 large shipping containers of lithium batteries)
It is extremely expensive to provide bulk electricity storage using batteries as well as inefficient. David Wojick, a Virginia-based Ph.D. in the logic and philosophy of science, explains in his article “California secretly struggles with renewables” (January 19, 2021):
“California has hooked up a grid battery system that is almost ten times bigger than the previous world record holder, but when it comes to making renewables reliable it is so small it might as well not exist.
The new battery array is rated at a storage capacity of 1,200 megawatt hours (MWh); easily eclipsing the record-holding 129 MWh Australian system built by Tesla a few years ago.
However, California peaks at a whopping 42,000 MW. If that happened on a hot, low-wind night this supposedly big battery would keep the lights on for just 1.7 minutes (that’s 103 seconds) …
The U.S. Energy Information Administration reports that grid scale battery systems have averaged around $1.5 million a MWh over the last few years.
At that price this trivial piece of storage cost just under TWO BILLION DOLLARS. At 103 seconds of peak storage that is about $18,000,000 a second. Money for nothing.”
These huge expenses are not only unwarranted, but futile in providing power to a large city. While California can benefit from air conditioning in its hot summers, Ottawa requires dependable very high-quality heat in its bitterly cold winters.
It truly becomes a matter of life or death, especially for the elderly or those with illnesses who are susceptible to the cold.
Moreover, storage of renewable energy has never been achieved on a large scale before, and it would thus be irresponsible to attempt it without further research. Professor Jacques Treiner, Associate researcher at LIED (Université Paris-Diderot), says that:
“Today when it comes to using renewable energies on a large scale, we don’t know how to store energy. If we knew how to do it, on the days of high production, we would stock it and we would use it during moments of low production.
But we do not know how to do that on a massive scale. And so, we cannot, at the moment, envisage an electrical mix that is 100 percent renewable energy.”
The low-capacity contributions for wind and solar power mean that large quantities of backup power are required if we are to avoid daily blackouts. With today’s technology, significant bulk battery storage of electricity is impractical and extremely expensive.
Currently, the use of bulk energy storage by batteries increases the cost of delivered electricity by 10 times the cost of renewable generation itself. We have to ask if the citizens of Ottawa, and indeed, any city introducing similar climate change plans, are prepared to cover this expense.
Most electric batteries are lithium based and rely on a mix of rare earth metals and cobalt, manganese, nickel, and graphite. Such materials require massive amounts of energy to mine, transport, process, and refine, far greater than the extraction and transport of oil and natural gas.
Mining and mineral processing also require large volumes of water and can pose contamination risks from mine drainage and wastewater discharge.
When mining rare earth metals, about 90 percent of what is pulled up from the ground contains uranium, thorium, and other radioactive nuclides. This radioactive waste can pose serious risks if it is improperly disposed of.
In China, for example, the champion of rare earth metals, in Heilongjiang province, a carpet of toxic dust covers agricultural regions.
China controls most of the lithium and cobalt, both essential components of solar panels, wind turbines, and batteries, which are often produced with child labor and near-slave labor, with practically no health, safety, or environmental safeguards.
ICSC-Canada Economics/Policy Advisor Robert Lyman explained:
“A recent United Nations report warned that the raw materials used in EV batteries are highly concentrated in a small number of countries where environmental, labor and safety regulations are weak or non-existent.
‘Artisanal’ cobalt production in the Democratic Republic of the Congo now supplies two-thirds of the global output of the mineral. Many of the mines employ child labor in extremely dangerous tasks.
Up to 40,000 children are estimated to be working in extremely dangerous conditions, with inadequate safety equipment, for very little money in the mines in Southern Katanga.”
This is just a sample of the injustices in meeting current raw material requirements for wind and solar power. Imagine the raw material demands, Third World mining, child labor conditions, and ecological destruction under the enormous demands of the planned “green” energy expansion.
We can see that, as large-scale wind and solar power must rely on large-scale lithium battery storage, they are entirely infeasible and, indeed, immoral to introduce in our society.
We need to supply our citizens with inexpensive, reliable, and plentiful energy, which cannot be achieved with renewable energy; no many how many batteries are hooked up to these flimsy power sources.
The City of Ottawa’s Climate Change Master Plan is doomed to failure, but it does have one bright side.
As Ottawans freeze in the dark because of our useless virtue signaling, politicians in other jurisdictions may very well take heed to not fall into the same environmental extremism trap.
Let’s hope they learn from our mistakes.
See more here americaoutloud.news
Header image: Engineered Systems Magazine
Bold emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
VOWG
| #
Only idiots in Ottawa could possibly think that is a viable idea.
Reply